2 readers online now  |  69 million page views


Reader comment on item: Obama Would Fail Security Clearance

Submitted by Sofa Sogood (United States), Nov 2, 2008 at 14:24

Do You Want the Children Brainwashed with Ayres Marxist Ideology? What Practices Are Planned to be Embedded in Students? What are Considered Positive Behaviors? What are Important Social Outcomes Mandated By the Bill, and Enforced by an Army of Psychologists?

Our Press Doesn't Cover It.

Positive Behavior for Effective Schools Act S.2111, was introduced in the Senate by Barack Obama on September 27, 2007.

If the Press Covered It, the Public would Demand Clarification of what this bill Intends to Accomplish.

Is this an Ayers formulated Bill? The answer is, undoubtedly, yes.

Is the bill aimed at improving students ability to be Successful Scholastically, or does it aim to Embed, the word used in the Act, Embed them with Ayres-Obama Socio-Political Ideas. Does it intend to Indoctrinate and Brainwash Children Into These Political Ideas?

As opposed to perhaps one or two Phychologists or Social Workers assigned to schools to Help Some Children with their personal problems, as this new law is written, an Army of

School Counselors, Social Workers, Psychologists, and other Qualified Professionals

will be Directly Dealing with All Students and Controlling Teachers and Programs.

The main goal of this bill is

to Achieve Important Social Outcomes.

Whose Idea of Important Social Outcomes do they propose to implement?

Through the Control of these Professionals, does the Act Intend to Make Non-Acceptance of these particular Socio-Political Ideas tantamount to Social-Psychological Dysfunction, and Subject Students and Teachers to

Soviet and Maoist Style Re-Education Denunciation and Ostracism if they Don't Conform?

Had the Bush Administration proposed such a program, what would have been public's rightful reaction?

September 27, 2007, when Obama introduced the

S.2111 Positive Behavior for Effect Schools Act,

it was Long Before Obama's connection to Ayres The Educator was Revealed. Had that connection been made public earlier, it is doubtful he would have introduced this bill at that time, because it Derives from Ayres Educational Ideas.

It is Logical to Conclude that the Ideas in the Program are Ayres. Or Ayres-Klonsky. Klonsky, partner in Ayres Educational Projects, is Another Avowed Communist.

1. By the time Obama met Ayres, Ayres was teaching at University of Illinois and had received an award from University of South Carolina. This bill, introduced in 2007, cites Three Unnamed Schools to Justify the Purpose of this Expansive Educational Legislation. Those schools are Located in Illinois and South Carolina.

2. Obama has Expressed Admiration of Ayres Educational Ideas, and has Backed that Up by Funding them through his position on the Boards of CAC and Woods Fund. This Funding amounted to approximately $160 Million. It's Important to Note that No Scholastic Improvement was Achieved with this enormous amount of funding, because the Money was Spent on programs which were Aimed at Politicizing the Classroom.

3. How did Obama become such an expert at education? Who else was advising him, besides Ayres?

In addition to Ayres, there is also Mike Klonsky, whose stated current mission is to Spread Marxist Ideology in the American Classroom. Obama Funded Klonsky and Ayres Small Schools Workshop to the tune of $2 Million.

Klonsky had maintained a Social Justice blog on the official Obama Campaign Website until it was remarked on by blogger Steve Diamond in June, and, in Stalinist fashion, was Disappeared.

Another Communist in Obama's Orb, Andrew C. McCarthy


Klonsky Snapshot Obama Website


Steve Diamond Re Klonsky


To Repeat, No Scholastic Improvement was Achieved with the enormous amount of CAC funding, $160 Million, because the Money was Spent on programs which were Aimed at Politicizing the Classroom.

Our Press Doesn't Cover It, But A Canadian Website Does

Obama's Revolutionary Positive Behavior for Effective Schools Act of 2007

by Marinka Peachmann, Oct 7, 2008


The question to ask today, however, is whether or not Ayers' Radical Ideologies Play a Role in Obama's Revolutionary 2007 Education Legislation.

Obama's Education Bill, S.2111, significantly Redesigns and Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to allow, in part, for State Local Educational Agencies and Schools to Increase Implementation of

Early Intervention Services, particularly School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports.

If Passed into Law, Funding to implement Obama's Bill will be Extracted, Without Restrictions, from Title I Funds currently budgeted in the President's 2009 budget at

US$14.3 Billion according to the Office of Management and Budget.

Obama's bill Re-Designates Funds to allow State Educational Agencies to

Allocate Funds to Develop and Implement

Coordinated, Early Intervening Services including

School-Wide Positive Behavior Supports for All Students,

Including those who have Not Been Identified as Needing Special Education.

According to Section 3, the term Positive Behavior Support means a

Systematic Approach to

Embed Proven Practices for Early Intervening Services, including a

Range of Systemic and Individualized Strategies to

Reinforce Desired Behaviors and Eliminate Reinforcement for Problem Behaviors, in order to

Achieve Important Social Outcomes.

Before Election-Day, Americans should Ask the serious and legitimate Question of

what precisely Obama's Positive Behavior Legislation Systematically Embeds in their Children.

As of publication, the Obama Campaign Hasn't Responded to Queries for Specifics.

Obama's bill Doesn't Specify Which Proven Practices will be

Embedded in students to

Achieve the Desired Behaviors or

Important Social Outcomes his legislation mandates,

but if one ascribes to Obama's Education Co-Chair at CAC,

Bill Ayers' Interpretation of Positive Behavior there is Reason for Concern.

Ayers Began his Career in Education

during his Weather Underground days where he served as the

Educational Secretary.

end of canadafreepress quote

Do You Want Your Children Brainwashed In Our Schools?

October 14, 2008, Excerpts


I hope my readers will pay close attention to the following post. It concerns a bill currently in committees in the House and Senate that was introduced by Senator Obama and two other Congressmen from Illinois. This bill is based on the Educational Theories of William Ayers.

This bill literally calls for the Brainwashing of our Children.

Educational Psychology was My Field and I can say Emphatically that These People Can Be Dangerous If Their Minds are Warped. And yet this bill would put

Social Engineers, Social Workers and Psychologists into the schools and with Daily Access to Children to

Teach them Correct Social Behaviors.

Do you Want Your Child Taught Correct Social Behaviors in Our Schools?

Do you Want to Turn your Children Over to Social Engineers and Psychologists

and given the Full Support of the US Federal Government to

Bend and Twist their Beliefs and thus Behaviors into some Pattern that Fit's a Terrorist's Ideas of What is Right and Wrong?

Well, Senator Barrack Obama, a man now running for the Presidency of the United States, Wants This So Much that he actually Introduced Legislation that would Make This The Law of the Land.

What do you think Will Happen To This Bill If He Becomes President?

Getting to Children in Schools is a Favorite Tactic of Communist and Socialists countries.

Get to the Children and You Will Claim the Population.

I am sure you have all seen the news videos of Little Children neatly lined up Singing and Reciting Verses that Glorify their Leaders Ideology. Think China! And then imagine American children in place of the Chinese children.

That is what this bill is all about.

Following links not on brendabowersblog




back to brendabowersblog

Brenda's answer to Kay, who had confused Obama's Educational Program with

prior PBIS - Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports - Programs

Answer to Kay, Oct 16, 2008 at 15:12

This program being used in the schools is a teacher based program. That is, the

lessons suggested for the teacher's use in his/her classroom as he/she sees fit.

This is from what I could tell a good program and I see nothing wrong with it.

My criteria is that it is Teacher Based and that the children are

Not Subjected to the Professional Manipulations of Professional Social Engineers as is the Case with the Obama Bill.

Though I do not visit Ayers blog as I hardly waste time on what I consider fools so I wasn't aware that

He Denounced the PBIS Program.

I can see where this would be his reaction to the PBIS program as it is being used.

Ayers Believes Only Professionals in the field of Psychology should be Implementing His Version of Positive Behavior Instruction.

His Words and the Words Used in the Bill are

Reshape Children's Thinking and Therefore Their Behavior.

This is the Bill Obama Introduced to Congress.

The Exact Words in the Bill are

Amends the Department of Education Organization Act to Establish, within the Department of Education, an

Office of Specialized Instructional Support Services to

Oversee, Implement, and Ensure Adequate Evaluation of,

the provision of Specialized Instructional Support Services in Schools

by School Counselors, Social Workers, Psychologists, and Other Qualified Professionals."

The schools Now using the program you are talking about probably have Some School Counselors and maybe a social worker or two, but This Bill Calls for a Great Deal More.

Read the wording of the bill Kay. Now do you understand my anger? In fact,

down right Horror at What This Man has Introduced Into Congress and just may get away with.

I will Fight this Bill in Every Way I Know How to fight it.

I hope this clears up this misunderstanding.

These people are Using the Right Words to soothe and Mislead.

Ayers is a professor of Education who Uses all the Right Words in Explaining his Theories of Education. But when one Reads the Fine Print and Between the Lines one Readily Understands his View of Education. He is a socialist terrorist now as he was then.

He is Merely using Different Bombs.

S. 2111 would amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow State educational agencies, local educational agencies, and schools to increase implementation of early intervention services, particularly school-wide positive behavior supports."

End of brendabowers blog quotation.

Ayres The Educator, whose position in the Weather Underground was Education Secretary, has repeated many times publicly that Although he has Given Up Violence,

His Ideology Remains The Same.

He now works to destroy the U.S. Government and its Ideals From Within.


Declassified FBI reports documenting Ayers and the Weather Underground Organization (WUO) might shed light on

what positive behavior students will learn if Ayers' influence on Obama persists.

Moreover this FBI summary reveals a connection between Ayer's WUO to the Black Liberation movement, a

theology which Obama's former God damn America 20-year pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright adheres to.

Dated August 20, 1976, the FBI summary states:

The goal of the WUO is the Destruction of US Imperialism and the Achievement of a Classless World. World Communism and

Struggles Within the US will be a Vital Part of this Process.
The WUO's movement focused on recruiting students.

The point of the revolutionary youth movement strategy is to move from a predominant student elite base To More Oppressed, Less Privileged Working Class Youth as a way of Deepening and Expanding the Revolutionary Youth Movement.

This is part of the Strategy to Reach the Entire Working Class to engage in Struggle Against Imperialism.

It is both important and possible to Reach Young People Wherever They Are. Not only in the shops, but also

In the Schools

To Recruit Them to Fight.

A good program Mobilizes and Teaches.
We made the choice to become a guerrilla organization

when the Vietnamese were fighting a heroic people's war, defeating

the most technologically advanced military power.

At home, the struggle and insurrection of the Black Liberation Movement heightened our Commitment to fight alongside the

Determined Enemies of the Empire.

This defined our international responsibility and our duty as white revolutionaries

Inside the Oppressor Nation.

We are part of a Wave of Revolution Sparked by the Black Liberation struggle.

Every movement must learn to fight correctly, Sometimes Retreating, Sometimes Advancing.

But fighting the enemy must be its reason for being.

The way America will aid the victory of the people of the world is

by helping to create a Front in Support of Black and Brown Liberation Here, and by

Tearing Up in the Gut of the Monster.

Destroying the Bureaucracy, the Pig Army, showing initially that

The US not only can't hold together an empire but can't even hold together white people.

end of canadafreepress quote.

Keep in mind that Obama and Ayres Do Not Care About People or Improving Anyone's Lives Except Their Own. Obama Did Not Protect the People in his District from the Ravages of Slum Lords. He Accepted Help From the Slumlord for His Campaigns and to obtain His Mansion of a Home.

They are Interested in the Implementation of their Ideology.

It is Not an Ideology Based on Helping Anyone. Whether It Helps Anyone Is Irrelevant To Them. It is an Ideology Based on Hatred And Arousing Hatred of Those Who Achieve More Than Others Due to Merit and Ability.

That's the True Meaning of Fairness.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item


Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)