The Justice looks considerably messy, along with the Student's Union.

Submitted by Ynna (United States), Feb 15, 2007 at 03:05

I submitted an inquiry to the Justice regarding University President Jehuda Reinharz remarks, so I'm waiting for their response.

For the time being, apparently, the Justice looks very messy. Shortly after releasing articles in regards to Carter and Dersdowitz and a couple of others, they made a series of corrections, in their page:

http://media.www.thejusticeonline.com/media/storage/paper573/news/2007/02/13/Corrections/Corrections.And.Clarifications-2716087.shtml

Until proven otherwise, The Justice looks irresponsible, not knowing exactly what they are doing regarding the matter.

Worse looks the Student's Union who want to have a Campaign for peace, where they would bring Dr Pipes and norman finlkelstein, to establish dialogue. Unfortunately, some parts of the Jews in America have not convinced themselves yet that bringing Norman is a waste of time and money and, if put in a debate with Dr. Pipes, in my opinion, I would consider it an outrage.

Despite so many truths about the irresponsibility and lies of Filkestein, bringing this virulent bigot, anti Semite, condoner of terrorist and condemner of Israel for struggling to defend herself, these Jews, under this useless liberal influence want to look fancy or simply make clear to me the deplorable level American Jews have reached in this country.

If they want to establish dialogue in between different sources, they should bring somebody at least serious, with a non bloodthirsty past like norman.

Somebody courageous, unlike norman who fearfully divest posting commentaries in is web site that oppose his view or challenge the veracity of a "reality" "proven by him....Norman is a perfect marica, and he is so b/c of his extreme insecurity.

So what's the point of bringing both in a debate, if I well understood their aim? What a waste of time?

http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper573/documents/98y455x5.pdf

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".