Submitted by anon (United States), Dec 24, 2006 at 19:17
Well, one thing that is different is the Soviet Union is gone. But the thesis of the article remains, that views on the ME can't be divided among left-right lines. Increasingly, however, pro-Israel sentiment has been shifting to the right, and both far-right conservatives and left wing liberals have attacked neoconservatives as being Jewish and putting Israel's interests foremost. Most members of Bush's administration, his supporters and Republicans in general tend to be neocon. The article also explains that lobbies have influence on ME policy because of the bureaucracies. People have been vilifying Israel lately for its lobbies and ascribing to it more power than it has, but its actual powers are understandable, and it is effective. One wonders with all the anti-lobby sentiment if that will remain the case.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Reader comments (1) on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| ⇒ Reading this in 2006, wow! [130 words] | anon | Dec 24, 2006 19:17 |
Comment on this item
See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.
|