| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by john w mcginley (United States), Aug 7, 2006 at 12:09
I hesitate to bring this up publically lest it gives the wrong people a horrible idea. On the other hand, if I can see this possibility I am certain that the president of Iran can see this possibility and perhaps has already made the arrgangments with that leader of North Korea. I am less confident that Bush and Rumsfeld and Cheney can see this possibility. After all they are the ones who decided to "shock and awe" THE WHOLE of Iraq with a ground force less than half the size of the gorund force used by the elder Bush simply to dislodge the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait.
This is the same crowd who bandied about "Mission Accomplished" in May, 2003 with flyboy landing on the flight deck of a US carrier in the Pacific. Talk about the gang which couldn't shoot straight. Don't get me wrong. It is simply deeply depressing to me that Gore and Kerry would have been worse.
So. What if we finally decided to DO something about Iran's headlong rush towards opeational nuclear weapons. Fine. But I hope our leaders see a huge contingency. The actions of the North Korean government circa July 4-5-and-6th stongly suggest that -- for whatever reason -- Iran and North Korea are quite capable of acting in concert with each other. What concrete plan, if any, do our leaders have if -- whether by threat or by action -- North Korea (who most likely does have nuclear weapons even if untested and the means to deliver then, at least several hundred of miles) decides play this card against South Korea if we attempt to take out Iran's nuclear capacity? Or even if they do not go nuclear, their army is far superior to the South Korean army and our thirty-seven thousand trrops will become, in effect, hostages.
John W. McGinley
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Islamofascist CAIR Doesn't Like the Term "Islamic Fascist" [26 words] | Terror-Free Oil | Aug 19, 2006 17:34 |
| Islamofascist CAIR Doesn't Like the Term " Islamic Fascist" [22 words] | Terror-Free Oil | Aug 18, 2006 16:37 |
| ⇒ I am chicken little [309 words] | john w mcginley | Aug 7, 2006 12:09 |
| The Conspiracy Theory [50 words] | james moerike | Aug 1, 2006 22:41 |
| CAIR - Just part of the Muslim machine [216 words] | JustaDog | Jul 31, 2006 20:01 |
| 1930's Jewish joke, updated for the times [34 words] | Casual observer | Jul 29, 2006 16:06 |
| Media spin need to improve [273 words] | lynn | Jul 28, 2006 10:25 |
| Another Conspiracy theorist to teach "islam: religion and culture" at Madison, WI [84 words] | J.S. | Jul 27, 2006 15:36 |
| conspiracy theories of the right? [67 words] | Bob | Jul 26, 2006 14:54 |
| Epistomology [46 words] | Brooks Imperial | Jul 23, 2006 12:27 |
| an outsider's insight. [60 words] | concerned | Jul 23, 2006 06:07 |
| ↔ European Sophistication [37 words] | Abu Nudnik | Jul 23, 2006 18:13 |
| ↔ European Sophistication Reply [268 words] | Nick | Jul 27, 2006 16:32 |
| ↔ yarhh... [25 words] | Klew | Jul 27, 2006 19:50 |