| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by M Bond (United States), Oct 23, 2002 at 23:14
That is a terribly brief review...So there was no redeeming value, essentially? I can appreciate a negative critique; this book deserved, I believe, something more serious even though Ms. Fallaci is not a specialist; she seems to possess, in at least some aspects, some keen social/moral insight based upon my reading of the article. Found it uneven at times yes, but it seemed to me she also touched upon something basic and very fundamental.Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Reply to commenter A. Pavel [486 words] | M Bond | Apr 18, 2005 02:51 |
| ↔ Oriana, Italy, Europe [254 words] | Andrea Italy | Dec 31, 2005 16:54 |
| Response to M. Bond [141 words] | Pavel A. | Sep 29, 2004 22:34 |
| There's more here [220 words] | M Bond | Oct 27, 2002 10:52 |
| ⇒ Well ok, but.... [74 words] | M Bond | Oct 23, 2002 23:14 |
| Unfair generalization [154 words] | Carool Kersten | Oct 15, 2002 22:07 |