28 readers online now

99,084 comments by 26,318 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Vishnu,You live in the past
Reader comment on item: Bush Declares War on Radical Islam
in response to reader comment: Mother Teresa, A Misused Icon To Furhter Aims Of Christian Conversions

Submitted by Don (India), Dec 2, 2005 at 03:08

Dear Vishnu

Your quote

"This more than 5000 year-old tradition continues unbroken in India alone, in various manifestations, to the remotest tribal village in India. The oldest Vedic poems refer to Indian geological features, its mountains, its famous rivers, and that tradition of veneration continues to this day. Vedic sciences, medicine and arts are practiced in India in an unbroken tradition despite the worst efforts of the Islam fascists and their Missionary counterparts. Sanskrit lives too"

What you speak on this forum and what is happening in each and every household in India, is quite different. While you are mentioning "5000 years old" history, all Indians are not living exactly the same life style of what their ancestors lived "5000 or 10000 years ago". India is booming, in software, biotechnology, and so on. India is posed to become one of Asia's economic powers along with China and Japan. Life is becoming competitive and fast in this fast-globalised world. Look at the call-centers sprouting in all major cities of India and where work is done in night shifts so as to "catch" and "be awake" with the Americans. Do you think India will live with its old "5000" tradition or move forward and try to adopt in this new, fast paced, technologically advanced era?

In India rural residents are moving to cities in search of jobs, roads to big cities are connecting villages, villages are getting modern hospitals, colleges, electricity, Internet, and other connections. Villages are fast becoming towns; towns are fast becoming big cities.

Look at the fast life of Indian in cities, specially among the younger generation, look at all the KFC, Pizza corners, Cyber cafes, Pubs etc…look at the 24 hour cable TV, Hollywood movies, Bollywood (Indian movies), the Fashion TVs, look at the craze among young Indian girls for fashion and cosmetics to be the next Miss World, the next "Aishawaray Rai"…. look at the premarital sex ratio of India (you can read any Indian magazine for that) and all you say is "missiories are changing Indian culture!"…You are living in the past my friend, wake up and be practical!

Look at what the Indian Muslims and Christians….

a) When a Hindu person coverts to Islam he has to change his name from Krishna, Arvind to Mohammed, Abdul or other Islamic or Arabized/Persianzed names. He has to shed his "ancestral name". Islam forbids having a Hindu or "kaffir" name attached to your Islamic one. Look at your president. Abdul Kalam…. does these names sound "Indian" to you? Neither Abdul nor kalam is an indigenous Indian name. On the other a Hindu convert Christianity doesn't have to forsake his name. I have heard of many Indian Christian names like Krishna Joseph or Arvind Matthew etc…. look at your former president of Indian who was a Catholic Christian who passed out recently, K R. Narayan…does Narayan sound a Christian name? In Christianity is not a MUST to abandon your ancestral names and adopt a new Arabized or Persian-zed names as in Islam, which is compulsory.

b) Look at the food habits of the Muslims in India. Their chicken or biryanis or their kebabs all their Mugal foods…look at the way Indian Muslim dress their kurtas/burqa/hijabs. This is Islam zed system and once you are Indian Muslim you are bound to live by that. But an Indian Christian is happy to be called Krishna Murthy and eat his dosa or idli and wear his lungi and live happily

c) Look at how most Indian Muslims support for their Muslim brethren when Indian is facing Pakistan in sport specially Cricket! There are many Indian Muslims who like to see their Pakistani brethrens succeed. Their loyalty is deep in Islam. Their loyalty is to Mecca, Islam and Mohammed. There are many Indian Muslim who also collaborate with Pakistanis jiahdists in attacks against their own country, India! What about Indian Christians Vishnu? Do Indian Christians rally behind Australia or South Africa in cricket matchs against their own country India? Are the protestant, Catholics orthodox Christians' loyalty to the Vatican?

d) Islam has divided India in pieces and got away with Pakistan and Bangladesh. Still India is "unfinished business" for many Muslims and there are more Muslim in India than in Pakistan! Look at what the Muslims are giving the Indians at the borders, in Kashmir daily bombs, suicide attacks… this attacks have become so routine that reading them in the new spread doesn't bring shock. People got used to them and became "numb" and are instead eyeing the missionaries! Look at how they Hindus are raped or have become extinct in Kashmir and Bangladesh. And all you do is checking how the missionaries are getting their milk powder or their medicine in treating the poor Hindus in villages or how many Hindus they had converts so far! Christianity is older than Islam in India and yet with its very old history, with the British Colonization, India Christians are still 2% of the Indian population and you talk about mass conversion of Hindus and Christianity being a threat to India! Is it Christian missionaries who divided India in pieces like Islamism?

e) While Christians schools, hospitals and other institutions are giving tremendous facility to every one in India it is rare to see Muslim organization in the same fields. It is known fact that Indian Christians might be 2% but their contribution in the field of all those facilities is worth praising.

Look at your Indian Christian brothers. Do you think you are more Indian than them? They eat, dress, behave like you and their respect their country and are loyal to it! Do you think you are lore loyal than them to your country? But what you are doing here is equating Christianity as dangerous as Islam! Wake up my friend look at the present life. We are in the 21st century and try to see what is putting your country in peril.

Your quote

. "Vedic sciences, medicine and arts are practiced in India in an unbroken tradition despite the worst efforts of the Islam fascists and their Missionary counterparts. Sanskrit lives too."

Vedic science is appreciated by man, however Indian culture had also many evil practices like burning wife (satya), untouchably among the lower castes (look at the Brahmin and lower caste friction), burning wife because of dowry etc…but fortunately though satya is eradicated, dowry harassment still continues even now and should be eradicated too. But missionaries changing Indian culture?

Your Quote
"Considering the no-holds barred high-decible attack on Hindus by evangelists in India and abroad, it would be a surprise if Hindus were not seriously provoked! That too, with the Christians united in an evil axis with terrorists and their backers in India."

Christians have joined with terrorists? That is news to me. Are you still talking about the British Empire? or CIA? are the world Chrsitians united in "evil axis"? Hindu provoked? Is that how you get provoked? By raping nuns, beating and abusing priests, burning churches, burning bibles, burning missionaries alive! Is that how you respond accusing missionaries of "forceful conversion"? Doesn't India have a government-law-justice system? Why can't you book to justice and the priest or person who "converted by force" with enough proof and then take the necessary action the same way you did to the Muslim terrorist who attack the Indian parliament on the Indian Republic day! Why you want to give a "fair judgment" to the Muslim terrorist who attacked your parliament fearing the wrath of Indian Muslims, for the Christians all you do is go and rampaging and burning their worship place! Is that how Hindus are provoked and what is the crime of those missionaries/Christians that you give them this much harassment? Because they converted some Hindus to Christianity? I'm just sick to the stomach of this "forced conversions" accusation. You should appreciate the Christian spirit when the fanatic Hindus went burning churches and raping nuns, the Christians didn't retaliate in the same way because they don't believe in savagery. You should commend this character. But you can't dare do that to Muslims and get away with it! Muslims will in return rape Hindu women are burn your Temples. Though Christians have many good things all you do is cling on conspiracy theories against them. So sad.

Wake up my friend; look in at your surrounding in India. Don't live in the past of "missionaries carrying bible in one hand and gun in the other idea". Are the missionaries carrying gun even now? All you do is "live in the past".

Your quote
"Don displays a certain kind of arrogant illogic that hopes to rely on the money and muscle power of Christian nations in undermining and decimating Hinduism in India"

This is just a wrong idea you have about me and I will just pass it on. I'm not decimating anything here. For your kind information I'm not a Western man. It makes little difference to me whether Hinduism originated in India or Persia or in Japan. The matter of fact is there is too much mention of "Aryan" in the origin of Hinduism, if not invasion them "Aryan migration" and even to the origin of those "fair skinned Indian Northerners" and if the scholars are wrong then we will accept the current theory. Why not? I don't know why you repeating this topic again and again when I have clearly told you that if they scholars are wrong or "motivated as what you claim it to be" then let it be so, that it is of Indian origin. But the idea that "this was coined by missionaries so that they wanted to invade" is a Hindu apologetic idea.

Your quote

"The persistence and pervasiveness of the Vedic Indian culture, which has stood the test of time on these shores, will once again defeat the primitivism and arrogance of the twin followers of the One Book dogma that seeks to dominate the world"

Again Vedic culture. Read above as to what is posing a great danger to the "Vedic Indian culture" as compared to Missionaries. Indian culture has for the first time has come face to face with the fast and superb technological advancement of all time and whether the Indian culture will fail or beat civilization and live for ever (!) is going to be a litmus test for the Indian culture as well as for all the cultural based poor nations of the world.

Your Quote

"Uninhibitedly targeting Hindus and their faith in various forums has in fact been counterproductive for Christianity. It does you no credit Don, in all your obfuscations, to provoke and then pretend innocence of nefarious design"

Let me make 2 things clear to you.
1. I'm against "forced conversion" what so ever. It is an insult to Christianity and to any Christian to bribe someone by money or by "protein milk powder" and make him accept Christ! If done by someone then it is utterly wrong. Christians if given chance should preach the message of Jesus Christ and if somebody accepts is well and good and but if they don't want, why force?
2. If any crime is done in the name of Christ and Christianity then that is wrong. Inquisition or crusades or any war or crime in the name of Christ is wrong. You know very well the message of Christ. It is not violence.

But Christians should continue to preach the message, open charities, hospitals and schools and help the poor and needy as Jesus Christ healed the sick and comforted the poor. So I don't see here what "nefarious design" you are talking about. Are you still talking about British empire/inquistion/crusdes/forced conversions which happened hundreds or thousand years ago?

Your quote

"People of the world are not the ingenues they were in colonial times to trust your fakery of 'Christian Love'. Your targets today are not untutored savages as projected by your insular theologians, but are in fact more spiritually evolved than you can ever hope to be. Sorry to disappoint you, Don, but the Hindus are not fools to allow you room in their midst, now that your political agenda is fully unsheathed."

Missionaries are still working in India. Since you have become "smart" nowadays to the tactics of missionaries now. What are you going to do? Tell me what are you going to do with the missionaries? Suppose if one Hindu wants to become a Christian what are going to do about it? If you want to close missionaries in India who is stopping you? Follow Venezuela or Iran or "Talbanize your country" into a "Hindu fundamentalist". Missionaries are Swedish/Finnish/British who come to your country and they come by flight, they need temporary/permanent "visa" depending on what your government gives them. Missionaries don't enter hiding your country through the borders of Nepal or Bangladesh and then open hospital or churches inside India all in secret. You can deny missionaries visa, close all charities or Christian institutions since they are a threat to your country!

While you are hibernating and meditating on the mantra "missionaries" technology and Muslim's expansion of "unfinished India" is fast eroding the 5000-year-old Vedic culture.

Wake up my friend this is 21st century and your rhetoric of inquistion/15th missionaries/petrol dollar or evangelism/forced conversions don't have a place today in India. Your view belongs to history books. Wake up, don't live in the past.

We are the children of the 21st century and live in "today". Missionaries are still working in India. Since you have become "smart" nowadays to the tactics of missionaries what are you going to do? Tell me what are you going to do with the missionaries? Suppose if one Hindu wants to become a Christian what are going to do about it? Why do you have to prescribe for every Hindu to live only as Hindu and follow 5000-year-old culture? You sound like those fanatic Muslims who live in the past and try to bring the 1400 year old of "Islamic glory" back to this 21st century.

Don.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (274) on this item

Title By Date
End of time [171 words]BobDec 16, 2008 04:12
my journey from dhimmihood [213 words]AgentDec 14, 2008 14:00
08, Still waiting for the "good muslims" to speak against islamofacists ! [213 words]Phil GreendSep 15, 2008 10:41
No serendipity, your hope will be deferred [21 words]The_researcherNov 11, 2008 22:20
Muslim Terrorism and Islam [2572 words]Abdur Rahman AbidDec 9, 2005 11:48
To Abid, Summary of early Islamic history [548 words]Abdullah A.Dec 9, 2005 16:09
Islam v Christian v Jewish (Muslim Terrorism and Islam [215 words]kim segarJan 17, 2006 13:18
Prophet Muhammed is a mercy to all the worlds [895 words]abd_abdalJan 25, 2006 13:39
Bush Declares War on Radical Islam [765 words]GayeMar 4, 2006 02:58
Response to abd_abdal [237 words]desi_dostJul 14, 2006 15:29
Laid the foundation for the Genva Convention?! [51 words]Kevin MJul 14, 2006 18:58
may ALLAH let them know. [72 words]Abdul rahman seiduNov 11, 2007 15:54
I've read the koran, cover to cover. Have you? [112 words]Andrew BrownJan 8, 2008 01:37
Help? [44 words]Dovid CoderSep 5, 2008 10:47
every sura has a name [89 words]Nehal safwatSep 14, 2009 11:58
hatred is all you know [90 words]NehalSep 14, 2009 12:04
if you can have explanation of these verses [258 words]HemantOct 10, 2009 19:49
Mother Teresa, A Misused Icon To Furhter Aims Of Christian Conversions [502 words]Rakshas 10 AnanNov 17, 2005 08:46
Reply to Rakshas 10 Anan [542 words]DonNov 18, 2005 02:46
To Don, About Mother Teresa and the Missionaries [237 words]Rakshas 10 AnanNov 19, 2005 00:50
To Rakshas... Save the "Refined English" and leave Mother Theresa/Missionaries alone! [323 words]DonNov 25, 2005 10:15
To A Very Confused And Contrary Don [1368 words]Rakshas 10 AnanNov 26, 2005 13:45
Don's Reply to Rakshas [November 25, 2005 at 10:15] [183 words]hohovahNov 27, 2005 13:21
Ah Don! The Missionary Position, At Last [146 words]Georges FernandezNov 28, 2005 01:24
Don Says, Aryan Invasion Theory Legitimises Missionary Christian and Other Invasions of India [397 words]Vishnu GuptaNov 28, 2005 02:54
To Rakshas...Opposition is not confuson [2803 words]DonNov 29, 2005 12:53
Vishnu- out of context [487 words]DonNov 30, 2005 03:03
White Man's Burden [275 words]Vishnu GuptaNov 30, 2005 14:20
'Hindu Invasion' Justifies Aggressive Evangelism in India (DON) [166 words]Vishnu GuptaNov 30, 2005 14:44
Indefensible, Don [387 words]Vishnu GuptaNov 30, 2005 16:10
To Don: A Little More Learning [63 words]Georges FernandezDec 1, 2005 09:14
⇒ Vishnu,You live in the past [2312 words]DonDec 2, 2005 03:08
To Georges! [105 words]DonDec 2, 2005 03:15
Don takes "confusion" to a new high! [2032 words]iasiusDec 2, 2005 04:10
To Vishnu-The Evils of Hindu Fanatics on Sikhs [61 words]B.SinghDec 2, 2005 06:30
To B. Singh [396 words]Vishnu GuptaDec 2, 2005 15:23
Welcome to Sanity, Don [142 words]Georges FernandezDec 2, 2005 15:37
Welcome to India of the 21st Century, Don [123 words]Vishnu GuptaDec 2, 2005 15:51
Don, may I suggest that you are wasting your time [329 words]allonehhobDec 2, 2005 18:20
Long Standing Pakistani ISI Propaganda- B. Singh [789 words]Vishnu GuptaDec 2, 2005 21:52
Response to Iasius [1074 words]DonDec 3, 2005 06:56
Sadly, Allonehhob's last contribution [1217 words]iasiusDec 3, 2005 09:49
To my friend and correspondent, Don [826 words]iasiusDec 6, 2005 07:56
Iasius "sense"---Part I [2834 words]DonDec 7, 2005 11:50
Alas! The doctrinaire Don.... [65 words]iasiusDec 7, 2005 15:33
Iasius "sense" and "correction?" Part- II [1647 words]DonDec 8, 2005 13:01
pak terror [253 words]smithJan 2, 2006 20:26
Prejudice [20 words]Sarahis90Feb 15, 2006 07:22
Hello DON [287 words]Tom NarayanApr 5, 2007 18:44
Christianity is not western. [57 words]Bobby NairMar 29, 2008 04:21
Don's comment on Christians in India [282 words]SujataAug 11, 2008 08:50
Aryan Invasion might not have occured at all [208 words]T.S.RaoOct 12, 2008 02:23
maybe [15 words]true believerJan 16, 2009 07:23
Islam, a religion of peace? [67 words]Robert K..Nov 9, 2005 11:40
Reply to Robert K. [239 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 10, 2005 11:04
Mueen Ud Deen is right partially [301 words]NaqviNov 14, 2005 18:03
Mueen Udd Deen , Please clarify [502 words]Mark G.Nov 14, 2005 18:14
Reply to Mark G. [480 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 25, 2005 07:55
War on Islam or on Islamism [292 words]Gay CarmanNov 7, 2005 07:07
Islam is NOT the Greatest Above All [323 words]DebraNov 3, 2005 14:56
Reply to Debra [41 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 10, 2005 11:09
Debra [233 words]MaariaJan 7, 2006 18:23
Simplification of Complex Faith Issues [106 words]TerrySep 19, 2006 12:01
Reply to John Bastile [315 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 2, 2005 05:11
Mr. Mu'een Ud Deen's Comment: I pinched myself 2ce; thought I was dreaming!!! [49 words]hohovahNov 2, 2005 18:35
Reply to Mu'een Ud Deen [430 words]John BastileNov 12, 2005 09:22
Reply to John Bastile [363 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 14, 2005 10:00
Mu'een Ud Deen's "Reply to John Bastile" - November 14, 2005 at 10:00 [234 words]hohovahNov 15, 2005 07:28
Bastile's post [45 words]AhmedNov 15, 2005 07:54
Reply to Hohovah [253 words]Mu'een Ud DeenNov 16, 2005 05:02
Further to my friend Mu'een Ud Deen [723 words]hohovahNov 17, 2005 15:25
Comments on Iasius statements [182 words]allonehhobOct 31, 2005 14:29
response to allonehhob [344 words]garyOct 31, 2005 22:06
To Gary [696 words]AllonehhobNov 1, 2005 13:15
For Gary and Allonehhob [1054 words]iasiusNov 3, 2005 13:37
to Iaisius [350 words]DebraNov 3, 2005 15:39
To iasius [222 words]AllonehhobNov 3, 2005 23:56
For Debra [870 words]iasiusNov 4, 2005 05:30
To Allonehhob [771 words]iasiusNov 5, 2005 04:20
Part 1 reply to iasius [2624 words]AllonehhobNov 5, 2005 19:25
Continue to iasius [415 words]AllonehhobNov 5, 2005 22:23
"Jesus" not historical? [51 words]Genghis GandhiNov 6, 2005 10:35
To Ghandi, Roman history and Christianity [1559 words]AllonehhobNov 6, 2005 23:37
Comment to iasius [907 words]DonNov 7, 2005 01:44
"Ducks in a row"? [239 words]iasiusNov 7, 2005 03:08
Historical Jesus [2824 words]AllonehhobNov 7, 2005 14:55
To Iasius- If one can't convince should one confuse? [1044 words]DonNov 10, 2005 05:44
For Allonehhob: response to "Part 1 reply to Iasius" & "Continue to Iasius" [752 words]iasiusNov 14, 2005 07:45
To my friend iasius [515 words]AllonehhobNov 14, 2005 22:59
allonehhob, again! [53 words]iasiusNov 16, 2005 01:33
iasius, who sees evil out of good [208 words]AllonehhobNov 16, 2005 15:57
From the "evil" Iasius to the "righteous" Allonehhob [334 words]iasiusNov 18, 2005 04:13
Common sense Iaisus, COMMON SENSE! [1538 words]DonNov 22, 2005 13:06
Reply to Iasius [196 words]Atim BasseyNov 23, 2005 11:35
Don's "common sense" [2327 words]iasiusNov 26, 2005 17:10
Atim's Comment [496 words]iasiusNov 28, 2005 04:30
Yes; Bush makes further commitment against Jihad (Oct. 28th speech) [134 words]AlanOct 29, 2005 13:06
Response to A.A , Amar and others [126 words]MohammedOct 26, 2005 12:08
Muhammad, Maybe we are all wrong, Please give me examples on how mercifull Muhammad was [41 words]AmarOct 26, 2005 17:35
Questions for Mohammed [373 words]John BastileOct 26, 2005 22:24
Response to Bastile [88 words]MohammedOct 27, 2005 18:34
Response to Mohammed [816 words]John BastileOct 28, 2005 00:21
Response to Amar [96 words]MohammedOct 28, 2005 11:09
Response to Bastile [248 words]MohammedOct 28, 2005 14:12
To Muhammad [201 words]AmarOct 28, 2005 14:13
Thank you, Mohammed. A muslim's asnwer [446 words]John BastileOct 28, 2005 23:00
Which "God" do you mean, Amar? [926 words]iasiusOct 31, 2005 04:22
muhammad (S.A.W.) [767 words]Abdullah HaleemMar 27, 2009 12:45
Bush Declares War on Radical islam art. No.3026 [75 words]S.C.PandaOct 26, 2005 05:56
abondoning islam.. [202 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 24, 2005 23:26
Bush Declares war on Radical Islam [972 words]iasiusOct 22, 2005 16:14
Iasius... I am an agnostic so.. [48 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 23, 2005 00:23
Re: "Iasius... I am an agnostic so.." [53 words]iasiusOct 23, 2005 19:02
no idealism.. [88 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 24, 2005 22:57
"no idealism..." responses [625 words]iasiusOct 26, 2005 05:18
Iasius.. [441 words]Saleem AkhtarOct 26, 2005 21:08
To Mr. Akhtar [912 words]iasiusOct 27, 2005 15:12
Mr. Iasius and Mr. Mohammed.. "Koran/Sunnah/Hadith is not Islam". [100 words]Saleem AkhtarOct 31, 2005 23:08
To Mr. Akhtar: "Koran/Sunnah/Hadith is not Islam". [526 words]iasiusNov 1, 2005 10:56
Mr. Iasius [84 words]Saleem AkhtarNov 2, 2005 00:08
Mohammaed Saleem Akhtar's version of Islam [408 words]John BastileOct 18, 2005 06:21
But again, Wahabists, Palestinians and Hypocrisy are to blame. [552 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 20, 2005 11:27
To John Bastile [432 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 20, 2005 14:44
Mohammed Saleem Akhtar's call to reform Islam [235 words]John BastileOct 22, 2005 06:27
to John Bastile [585 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 22, 2005 18:32
Impossible to reform Islam [350 words]John BastileOct 24, 2005 03:06
Why the hush up of Oct. 1, 2005, suicide bomb at U. of Oklahoma? [89 words]Chris ChrismanOct 17, 2005 09:45
Slapshtik Hirsutitis [478 words]Swahili DinazOct 17, 2005 06:14
The Hypocrisy of Islam [133 words]RickOct 17, 2005 00:25
Rsponse to Rick [125 words]JaladhiOct 17, 2005 09:31
response to Jaladhi [315 words]EdwardOct 17, 2005 14:31
Response to Edward [103 words]JaladhiOct 17, 2005 15:47
final response to mr akhtar and a comment on edward [682 words]garyOct 17, 2005 17:53
To Gary, Rick, Jaladhi, Edward [165 words]Swahili DinazOct 18, 2005 01:33
Gary and Jaladhi you got to understand the fundamentals of what is going on [600 words]EdwardOct 18, 2005 13:45
To Edward, contradiction in your statement? [479 words]allonehhobOct 18, 2005 15:41
Comments on Edward's post [181 words]N. KhanOct 18, 2005 16:25
To Edward [243 words]HishamOct 18, 2005 17:45
response to ed [981 words]garyOct 18, 2005 21:04
Preaching in islamic countries, Response to Edward [216 words]Steve F.Oct 19, 2005 02:57
Response to Edward [427 words]JaladhiOct 19, 2005 12:10
Illegally occupied lands, response to Edward [187 words]A.A.Oct 19, 2005 12:35
Edward's Soothing Lullaby [83 words]WalterOct 19, 2005 19:03
Response to Rick [57 words]MaryOct 20, 2005 07:28
Get ur facts right [314 words]LumaFeb 23, 2006 22:50
Why only Muslims are Calumnious? [69 words]Muhammad AwaisNov 20, 2007 08:49
its right Mr Bush [62 words]radjiOct 16, 2005 17:50
Earthquake and Islam [164 words]Hari IyerOct 16, 2005 03:16
The real path..... [328 words]Talha IqbalOct 18, 2009 22:55
Does Mr. Bush "Get It?" A Recap [218 words]orange yonasonOct 16, 2005 01:54
Will the Moderate Muslims Please Stand Up And Show the Way? [930 words]Swahili DinazOct 15, 2005 14:02
To Swahili Dinaz [690 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 15, 2005 18:18
To Mohammad Saleem Akhtar, The Lion-Hearted Solitary Defender [1031 words]Swahili DinazOct 16, 2005 12:32
To Mohammad Saleem Akhtar (Addendum) [310 words]Swahili DinazOct 16, 2005 13:51
The passionate and emotional Swahili Dinaz [579 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 16, 2005 19:29
Interpretation of Quran, Response to Mohammed Akhtar [201 words]JimOct 17, 2005 14:48
Saudi women [99 words]SophieOct 15, 2005 08:56
Bushes naming the enemy, flushed out Saudi Whabbi! [137 words]Chard JeromeOct 15, 2005 01:21
Re: The Real Terrorism [1731 words]Reuben HorneOct 15, 2005 00:57
Hatred against 'Muslims' would be a wrong strategy... [283 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 14, 2005 18:35
To: Mohammed Saleem Akhtar [229 words]Chard JeromeOct 15, 2005 21:55
Knowledge is Paramount [76 words]Ali MustansirApr 7, 2006 02:15
Blasphemy - armor of the cowards [786 words]sadia masroorApr 10, 2008 05:33
Jaladhi's, Michael Glass', J Force's comments [10 words]Ready TeddyOct 14, 2005 16:35
Test for Muslims [74 words]WalterOct 14, 2005 14:15
Racism In Islam [138 words]YovenOct 14, 2005 13:14
Black Racism in islam [172 words]non arabOct 14, 2009 02:55
Bush Declares War on Radical Islam [70 words]I.D. BradleyOct 14, 2005 11:27
Radical Distinction? [398 words]ShlomoOct 14, 2005 01:16
The fear in the heart of the Americans [184 words]f. shawkiOct 13, 2005 23:02
Comments of F. Shawki [109 words]JaladhiOct 14, 2005 09:27
multi-headed hydra [234 words]Arnie FishmanOct 13, 2005 20:00
Bush Declares War on Radical Islam [323 words]Maurice PicowOct 13, 2005 17:09
Wars are violent conflicts between governments. [182 words]Ralph C Whaley MDOct 13, 2005 16:39
What's missing [216 words]yuval Brandstetter MDOct 13, 2005 14:53
Well done Mr. Pipes, but one could be even more specific [420 words]AriOct 13, 2005 11:20
Also.. [7 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 12, 2005 23:11
Radical Islam [75 words]Mohammaed Saleem AkhtarOct 12, 2005 23:04
response to mr akhtar [288 words]garyOct 14, 2005 22:05
Mohammed Saleem Akhtar [379 words]WalterOct 15, 2005 00:26
Gary and Walter [391 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 15, 2005 01:25
Walter [178 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 15, 2005 01:55
Islam is obeying Allah and Mohammed, Response to saleem Akhtar [205 words]MohammedOct 16, 2005 00:32
Islam without quran and Mohammed, Response to Akhtar [121 words]Hamza Y.Oct 16, 2005 01:16
To Hamza and Mohammed [557 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 16, 2005 10:02
An illuminating post by Mohammed [144 words]SullyOct 16, 2005 11:23
Wahabis follow quran and sunna, response to Akhtar. [371 words]MohammedOct 17, 2005 13:35
Islam cannot be reformed, Response to Mohammed Akhtar [261 words]RobertOct 17, 2005 14:40
Allah hates non muslims, Response to Mohammed Akhtar [450 words]Abdullah A.Oct 17, 2005 15:06
Why blame wahabis, response to Akhtar [271 words]MamdouhOct 17, 2005 17:29
Koranic verses- a clarification. [372 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 20, 2005 12:55
Islam is following quran and sunna, Response to Akhtar [244 words]MohammedOct 21, 2005 13:07
To Mohammed [348 words]Mohammed Saleem AkhtarOct 22, 2005 02:52
Prophet was a living quran, Response to Akhtar [233 words]MohammedOct 24, 2005 02:03
I see no hope Akhtar trying to convince Mohammad [186 words]AmarOct 24, 2005 21:25
Mohammed is right. The prophet was the living quran. (Oct 24 post) [596 words]John BastileOct 25, 2005 05:01
Question to Mohammed [239 words]A.A.Oct 25, 2005 19:34
Mis understanding of dawah [200 words]yusuf AbdullahAug 27, 2006 14:36
lies again [89 words]sakina luluAug 30, 2007 13:29
Islam cannot be reformed!! [47 words]SM AkhtarJun 25, 2008 13:44
Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W.) [180 words]Abdullah HaleemMar 22, 2009 19:24
A Word of Caution [122 words]Aidan MaconachyOct 12, 2005 21:09
Moderates just waiting to become radical. [204 words]Dale EhrgottOct 12, 2005 19:44
geez, what a surprise [439 words]garyOct 12, 2005 19:19
Thank you LORD. [188 words]YovenOct 12, 2005 17:09
A Decision Rule for Bush's War [85 words]Martin KesslerOct 12, 2005 15:55
Seperation of Radical from Islam [257 words]Kevin BaysOct 12, 2005 14:19
Reply to Kevin Bays [105 words]MaryOct 13, 2005 02:42
George Bush's "War on Terror" speech [277 words]Jacqueline F. KnoblockOct 12, 2005 12:22
What Bush should have said ... [384 words]Victor PurintonOct 12, 2005 13:10
war on terror [41 words]alessandroSep 28, 2006 01:39
Enough political correctness. [298 words]PatOct 12, 2005 11:15
Islam IS the problem [202 words]Bill StoreyOct 12, 2005 10:28
Bush Declares War on Radical Islam (For Bill Storey) [10 words]Jacqueline F. KnoblockOct 12, 2005 17:11
Jihad can be good [55 words]JessOct 12, 2005 09:25
Islam and the US Constitution [334 words]Michael GlassOct 12, 2005 07:38
Bush Declares War on Radical Islam [216 words]Michael GlassOct 12, 2005 06:51
Abhor violent reaction. Win their heart by conviction that universal love & brotherhood as fundamental principles of ISLAM [320 words]N NatarajanOct 12, 2005 05:42
Natarajan is Correct [222 words]WalterOct 12, 2005 21:27
and what about the anticonstitutionality of the Holy Book [82 words]francesco G.MangasciaOct 12, 2005 03:25
Islamic Jihad [69 words]Swahili DinazOct 12, 2005 02:36
A small step in right direction [261 words]Amitabh tripathiOct 12, 2005 02:06
to: Amitabh tripathi [292 words]orange yonasonOct 12, 2005 12:01
Congratulations but [83 words]Howard E. CookOct 11, 2005 22:31
Religion of peace [214 words]RobbyOct 11, 2005 22:02
Better Later than Never [791 words]Yehoshua ZellerOct 11, 2005 21:34
Barbary Pirates
[w/response] [33 words]
Gil BOct 11, 2005 21:10
Religion of Bin Laden and his Ilk is Islam [300 words]JaladhiOct 11, 2005 20:51
Inspired By Jaladhi [73 words]orange yonasonOct 12, 2005 12:14
A Top 25 Comment! [34 words]Cornelia CreasyOct 12, 2005 13:26
militant islam is islam [170 words]henry newmanOct 11, 2005 19:29
Bush Declares War on Radical Islam [208 words]NTMOct 11, 2005 18:34
Where are the moderates? The reformists? [90 words]Always On WatchOct 11, 2005 18:21
Bush war on islam [56 words]bobOct 11, 2005 18:04
Is Radical Islam and better than the Radical Religious Right ? [234 words]Gunther SteinbergOct 11, 2005 17:45
Response to Gunther Steinberg [455 words]DebraOct 31, 2005 23:29
Stop the dribble, state the facts [177 words]J ForceOct 11, 2005 17:39
Islamism - a distraction from Islam [146 words]AndrewOct 11, 2005 17:37
There is one islam [274 words]M. J. KhanOct 11, 2005 17:23
M.J. Khan knows.... [252 words]Cornelia CreasyOct 12, 2005 08:54
Sick of the hypocrisy [326 words]Future ACLU OpponentOct 11, 2005 17:08
Reply to Future ACLU Opponent [82 words]MaryOct 12, 2005 10:38
Extreme Islamists are dissatisfied with our world and want to leave [109 words]David GoshenOct 11, 2005 16:54
Presidential support [114 words]Thomas Earl CannadyOct 11, 2005 16:17
jihad [228 words]Donald W. BalesOct 11, 2005 16:11
The plot thickens. [44 words]Darwin BarrettOct 11, 2005 15:41
Halfway measures [428 words]Charles FortnerOct 11, 2005 15:24
An Islamic empire all over the world [63 words]David AlgazeOct 11, 2005 15:23
Funny [57 words]Kosovan MuslimMar 13, 2006 10:31
war on islam [56 words]samDec 31, 2007 15:41
Bush is wrong; not an ideology like Communism [246 words]Steve KleinOct 11, 2005 15:08
What of those who do not preach violence? [186 words]J.S.Oct 11, 2005 15:06
Al Qaeda, Sinai, Iskander SS-26 & Bush's words [352 words]Nachum ' Nick" WiesenfeldOct 11, 2005 15:03
For "Nick".....Inalienable rights [142 words]Cornelia CreasyOct 13, 2005 08:12
Mr. President: What took you so long? [100 words]There is NO Santa ClausOct 11, 2005 14:50
WHAT THEY WANT IS THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE. [139 words]BATYA DAGANOct 11, 2005 14:48
Radical Islam [210 words]Dr. Anthony RuffinoOct 11, 2005 14:21
Islamism And It's Intimate Connection With Nazism [58 words]orange yonasonOct 11, 2005 14:11
It's A Start, But... [291 words]orange yonasonOct 11, 2005 13:55
Faithfully Sounding the Alarm [174 words]Norman SingerOct 11, 2005 13:52
Bush declares our enemy.. [52 words]kim segarOct 11, 2005 13:43
Sharia Laws [241 words]Apostate of islamOct 11, 2005 13:24
Koran misquoted? and nature of Islam [280 words]Jonathan David CarsonOct 11, 2005 13:23
Pipes Right on with Islamic Threat [42 words]Cynthia GrenierOct 11, 2005 13:23
Unimpressed by Bush [32 words]Roger W. TalbotOct 11, 2005 13:22
Response to Roger re Gaza Strip [147 words]SullyOct 11, 2005 16:30
Sully, You Are Missing The Point [129 words]orange yonasonOct 12, 2005 13:26
War on Islam or on Islamism [46 words]Romesh ChanderOct 11, 2005 13:10
war on Islam [210 words]peter poweSep 27, 2006 23:26
Explicit candor [74 words]Yair WeinstockOct 11, 2005 13:03
Pipes' Points Finally Having Impact
[w/response] [193 words]
steve chambersOct 11, 2005 12:57
A light at the end of the tunnel [99 words]abrahamOct 11, 2005 12:54
Need to remove Islam from religion [499 words]John BastileOct 11, 2005 12:52
Comment on John Bastile post [101 words]A.A.Oct 11, 2005 15:52

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.