1 readers online now  |  69 million page views
You're invited: Join Daniel Pipes & MEF on a fact-finding mission
to Poland, Hungary & Austria. For more information, click here

"On the Nature of Natural Law" by Sir John Fortescue

Reader comment on item: Conservatism's Hidden History

Submitted by Robert (United States), Aug 28, 2018 at 08:53

Dear Daniel Pipes,

I'll try to be extremely brief this time- so that you might be responsive.

Although Sir John Fortescue, who died in 1477, wrote in "English,"
English the was quite different,
to the point that is was difficult to read without some training;
for example where a "s" occurred, a font that looked like "f" occurred.
Only in 1997 (reprinted in 2002) did Cambridge University Press
re-print FIVE (5) of the texts and text excerpts,
of Fortescue, in beautiful modern English,
under the title "O the Laws and Governance of England."
It is this book which the two author's of the essay you "respect" here, cite.
That inspired me to buy it
because I knew that Fortescue was a Revolutionary Liberal, not a conservative,
though I never read him explicitly, but those scholars who only wrote about him.

On August 27, 2018 (yesterday)my copy arrived from Amazon.com.
The book only cost me $2.78 + $3.99 Shipping.

I want to direct your attention to Appendix A of this Fortescue anthology.
It is an Extract from Fortescue "On the Nature of the Law of Nature."
The fact is that Fortescue was a "liberal" by any definition of that term, at that time,
so that your favored 2 Israeli authors of the article here, are severely mistaken.
That is irrefutably demonstrated by reliance on the Law of Nature (=Natural Law)
which precedes its foundation on Axiomatics of John Locke,
and the (unmentioned) British Conservative, Thomas Hobbes, who Euclid,
who gave us, in the Mathematics, particularly Geometry, the Axiomatic Method,
which even Sir Isaac Newton used for Modern (non-Aristotlean) Physics.

Furthermore, as any scholar of English late medieval Constitutional history knows,
Fortescue founded his work on that of
his earlier British predecessor, HENRY DE BRACTON (1210-1268).
This at least "Liberal" (if not "Revolutionary"int he sense of "going back"
when completing the Cycle) had a basis in Natural Law of the Catholic Church
which itself acquired it from Ancient Greek Aristotle,
who had been re-discovered when Plato dominated earlier Medieval though.

Now Thomas Jefferson, like Sir John Fortescue,
it is well known, read the Brit, de Bracton.

Perhaps the most serious misunderstand in the work of these scholars you value
is the fact that until the American Revolution (1776),
"Revolution" meant a return to earlier times,
as in the Glorious Revolution (1688).
In the case of the British, the Monarchy was restored;
in the case of us Americans,the British monarchy needed constitutional "decapitation"
because the Colonies weren't represented in Parliament,
and the American gentry Colonies were being Taxed without representation,
particularly aggravated by the months it took for an American to reach London
back then before the Jet Supersonic Airplane.

So Thomas Jefferson was a Conservative Revolutionary
who wanted to exercise the Ancient Rights embodied in the Law of Nature.
And like Fortescue before him, was reading the earlier "Liberal," Henry de Bracton ,
particularly "De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae"
("On the Laws and Customs of England"):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_de_Bracton


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Daniel Pipes replies:

I have alerted the co-authors to your comment and invited them to reply to it.

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (85) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1"The Conservatives" (2009) by Patrick Allitt (Yale University Press) [357 words]RobertSep 26, 2018 15:25245072
11669 The Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina & Antidisestablishmentarianism [806 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertSep 14, 2018 11:14244863
1"The Virtue of Nationalism" by Yoram Hazony [224 words]RobertSep 10, 2018 11:23244798
2From "The Common Law" by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (1881) [442 words]RobertSep 4, 2018 13:20244635
Empiricism is not the same as "Human Experience" [325 words]Michael SSep 4, 2018 20:07244635
(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) [511 words]RobertSep 5, 2018 14:39244635
Who are the "great" philosophers? [158 words]Michael SSep 5, 2018 17:05244635
2The Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume [287 words]RobertSep 5, 2018 21:10244635
1Πλάτων, Σωκρατης, Αριστοτέλης? No? [103 words]dhimmi no moreSep 6, 2018 07:56244635
Greek Philosophy? It's all Greek to me; but Job, Jesus and Shakespeare have given words to live by through the ages [583 words]Michael SSep 6, 2018 18:46244635
Are you a liberal, Robert? I assume you are. [109 words]Michael SSep 7, 2018 02:04244635
Footnote: The etymology of the word Europe [161 words]dhimmi no moreSep 7, 2018 08:28244635
1"The Chemistryb of the Bible" by Michael S. [313 words]RobertSep 7, 2018 15:42244635
1Yes, Greek Philosophy and the West! [96 words]dhimmi no moreSep 7, 2018 16:21244635
Plato, Athanasius and Western Society [457 words]Michael SSep 7, 2018 18:16244635
Plato, Athanasius, Nag Hammadi, Apocrypha, Arianism AND Islam [405 words]dhimmi no moreSep 10, 2018 16:52244635
Athanasius, Schisms and Primitivism [195 words]Michael SSep 11, 2018 01:51244635
1Today's Arianism! [204 words]dhimmi no moreSep 11, 2018 14:01244635
2In Memory of the victims of the 9/11 and we will "Never Forget" [204 words]dhimmi no moreSep 11, 2018 16:45244635
Is Jesus God? or are they two different characters? What does Vital tell us? [884 words]Michael SSep 29, 2018 19:02244635
1Conservative Liberals vs. Liberal Conservatives [354 words]RobertOct 1, 2018 14:18244635
Philosophy, Religion, Homosexuality and Conservatism [1365 words]Michael SOct 1, 2018 16:20244635
1Patriot (American Revolution) [Whigs & Tories] [282 words]RobertOct 1, 2018 21:56244635
Micheal: Maraya Khad Hu! The Peshitta, the Coptic Sahidic Bible, The Christian Arabic Bible and even the Qur'an [231 words]dhimmi no moreOct 2, 2018 07:22244635
Trinitarian excuse [181 words]Michael SOct 3, 2018 01:32244635
Conservatives and Liberals haven't really changed much through time. [819 words]Michael SOct 3, 2018 03:24244635
Michael: Nothing is ever simple and the Syriac word ܨܶܡܕܳܐ [300 words]dhimmi no moreOct 3, 2018 17:56244635
1Michael: Nothing is ever simple and the Syriac word ܨܶܡܕܳܐ Part two [267 words]dhimmi no moreOct 4, 2018 06:44244635
I want your opinion of the Sh'ma [93 words]Michael SOct 5, 2018 01:41244635
2The Yazidi woman Nadia Murad Basi awarded the Nobel Prize [339 words]dhimmi no moreOct 5, 2018 06:27244635
1Michael: ܫܡܥ (Syro-Aramaic) שמע (Hebrew) اسمع (Arabic) Or To Hear [595 words]dhimmi no moreOct 5, 2018 18:10244635
1Non-Simple, but Informative :-) [10 words]Michael SOct 5, 2018 19:57244635
Footnote: The Quranic word al-Samad [301 words]dhimmi no moreOct 6, 2018 07:58244635
Michael: Extant fragments of the NT and OT from the Syriac Peshitta ܦܫܝܛܬܐ or بسيطة in Arabic [26 words]dhimmi no moreOct 7, 2018 13:56244635
Confusion [220 words]Michael SOct 9, 2018 00:20244635
Michael: Nothing is simple! Echad, Khad, Wahid means one as in number one! Samad(a) means Bundle [326 words]dhimmi no moreOct 9, 2018 16:09244635
Muslim, Jewish and Christian views of God, all vs. the Bible. [649 words]Michael SOct 10, 2018 00:30244635
Michael: Ethnocentrism and the religions from the East (Levant, Mesopotamia and Israel/Palestine) [683 words]dhimmi no moreOct 10, 2018 14:25244635
1Who is really جمال خاشقجي or Jamal Khashoqji? Libya, Islamism, the Muslim Brotherhood and US politicians! [245 words]dhimmi no moreOct 12, 2018 06:40244635
1Who is really جمال خاشقجي or Jamal Khashoqji? Was he an Islamist? It seems that he was indeed an Islamist and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood [215 words]dhimmi no moreOct 13, 2018 11:19244635
Who was really جمال خاشقجي or Jamal Khashoqji? And what next? [162 words]dhimmi no moreOct 16, 2018 07:25244635
2Yoram Hazony: Israeli Philosopher, Bible Scholar, Political Theorist, Modern Orthodox Jew [176 words]RobertAug 30, 2018 21:30244497
21567 "A learned commendation of the politique lawes of Englande / newly translated into Englishe by Robert Mulcaster." [332 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertAug 29, 2018 23:07244479
2"On the Nature of Natural Law" by Sir John Fortescue [495 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertAug 28, 2018 08:53244454
1Revolution [642 words]RobertAug 23, 2018 08:34244362
We should not overlook consevatives' anti-semitism [356 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
BorisAug 11, 2018 14:19244185
The Relationship between Conservatism and Liberalism: It's Complicated! [170 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Martin J. MallietAug 11, 2018 09:03244178
Liberalism is doomed to failure [148 words]Michael SAug 21, 2018 21:38244178
Aren't we all 'frogpondians' doomed to failure? [241 words]Martin J. MallietAug 23, 2018 06:33244178
The Word of God, vs. Human Reason, as the sustainer of reality [826 words]Michael SAug 25, 2018 07:56244178
Frogpondians and the Tower of Babel [104 words]Martin J. MallietAug 31, 2018 18:52244178
GO: Collect $200 salary as you pass [404 words]Michael SSep 1, 2018 03:00244178
Frogpondian deformations of faith and the egophanic frogpondian revolt [357 words]Martin J. MallietSep 4, 2018 15:02244178
Where do good ideas come from? [454 words]Michael SSep 4, 2018 17:48244178
Can the wisdom of ages be gained outside the cloud of philosophy? [122 words]Martin J. MallietSep 5, 2018 08:43244178
Petersonian Philosophy, and other vexations [692 words]Michael SSep 5, 2018 16:39244178
Jordan B. Peterson, philosophy, and the Cloud of Unknowing [213 words]Martin J. MallietSep 6, 2018 05:00244178
"Unseen", but very tangible [895 words]Michael SSep 6, 2018 19:38244178
The long goodbye [471 words]Martin J. MallietSep 7, 2018 17:46244178
More on "Where Good Ideas Come From" [452 words]Michael SSep 11, 2018 02:25244178
Liberalism flatters the ego [116 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Michael SAug 7, 2018 01:14244122
The historical fiction of Irrational Conservatism [242 words]Tom RossmanAug 3, 2018 11:30244064
common law vs Roman law [210 words]John TaylorAug 3, 2018 02:56244056
Sharia Courts. [55 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Reynald de ChatillonAug 3, 2018 01:39244055
Can Western style liberal democracy survive? [348 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Phil MondAug 1, 2018 20:26244025
3Man is not governed by reason [89 words]LBFAug 1, 2018 10:16244020
The Natural Law that Governs [113 words]K. JerniAug 1, 2018 02:21244013
Personal Experience [354 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Dennis MiddlebrooksJul 31, 2018 12:49244000
1What happened to liberalism? [595 words]JeffAug 2, 2018 17:11244000
It's About Who Will Obey The Law - Liberals or Conservatives - What Were They Taught! [639 words]M ToveyAug 6, 2018 13:55244000
1Dennis: Your understanding is skewed. [434 words]Michael S.Aug 8, 2018 18:35244000
No, your Comments Are Skewed [296 words]Dennis MiddlebrooksAug 9, 2018 15:33244000
Ancient wisdom vs. Modern rationalism [35 words]Michael SAug 10, 2018 08:22244000
Ancient Wisdom Vs. Modern Rationalism [64 words]Dennis MiddlebrooksAug 10, 2018 20:11244000
James Madison [91 words]JeffAug 12, 2018 10:05244000
2What about the article cited? [317 words]LudvikusAug 24, 2018 23:25244000
Liberty, Truly Observed, Knows How to Survive in a Properly Governed Environment [386 words]M. ToveyAug 31, 2018 13:56244000
Conservatism's Structural Defect [286 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
John W HowardJul 31, 2018 12:03243999
1SOME conservatives definitely have "an idea what to do" -- and a good idea, at that [417 words]Michael SAug 8, 2018 13:58243999
the study of history [123 words]rwJul 31, 2018 06:17243992
Philosophies of political thought is important [151 words]Ilbert PhillipsJul 31, 2018 04:52243989
Atta boy ! [45 words]Christopher GameJul 31, 2018 02:56243985
Conservatism v. Liberalism: A Case Humanity Will Never Fully Adjudicate [373 words]M ToveyJul 30, 2018 19:20243978
Liberal democracy leads to inefficient governance. Societies with inefficient governance do not survive. [3 words]Phil MondAug 1, 2018 08:32243978
The most survivable society: Central Africa [226 words]Michael SAug 11, 2018 08:25243978

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to "On the Nature of Natural Law" by Sir John Fortescue by Robert

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)