69 million page views

WHY DO LEFTISTS ENDORSE ISLAM?

Reader comment on item: Finally Getting Serious about Identifying Islamists?
in response to reader comment: How to recognize an Islamist?

Submitted by UNCLE VLADDI (Canada), Jun 2, 2016 at 16:51

Ask: why do "leftist" 'activist' extortionist gangsters always support "muslim" extortionist gangsters?

Proglodytes are "taught" SEDITION (abused by the false and backwards notion) that "Nations Cause Wars!"

To them, the idea of "nations" and "nationalism" only began during the Enlightenment, and was a concept - exactly like that of "greedily" owning, hording (and improving!) personal property, which was an idea deliberately invented by racist white people (including, of course, the Jews) to create exclusivist borders and restrict the movements of all those noble swarthy collectivist tribal savages on the planet.

Ignoring the fact that all the nations on earth evolved organically over time, from families to clans to tribes to nations to states and eventually empires, they "reason" in their usual, literally backwards, pre-posterous ways, that, in order to achieve world peace, they must first destroy the concept of "nations!"

That way those who destroyed their own nations won't have to feel jealous anymore about those who didn't.

And they hate Israel the most, because it is the most successful nation, the main one to disprove their fantasy claims.

Muslims, too, are never patriots; they regard all national sovereignties as temporary, man-made false idols which must all be eventually destroyed and replaced with the one-world global muslim Ummah, to be ruled by their theocratic caliphate, and their duty is to wage offensive war to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims. Terrorism is an inherent, not an incidental, component of islam.

No self-determined muslim believes in any sovereign national governments nor countries at all, ever!

Islam's Sharia is either compatable with our Western, morality-based law (in which case it is superfluous) or it is not (in which case it is illegal).

Sharia denies freedom of speech, freedom of religion and equality. It requires corporal punishments. It requires perpetual war. It also requires that elected and appointed officials be Muslims.

There is only one universally accepted version of sharia crime ('law') and that is the original, Haneefite version as recorded in The Hedaya and used by the Ottoman Empire to rule all of islam for centuries; all moslems in all their countries are very aware of its simple might-makes-right and us-versus-them tenets and strictures.

There is really only one Qur'an, one islam, and one sharia.

And since islam is inherently SEDITION against ALL sovereign national countries (which it regards as only temporary man-made false idols, to be eventually destroyed and replaced by the global muslim Ummah, ruled by their theocratic Caliphate government - Sura 18:26) because since the Qur'an and subsequent sharia elaborations embody "god's" perfect laws which are to apply to all mankind everywhere, why would anyone ever need any merely human legislators (even 'democratically elected' ones)?!

So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its "muslim" members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

Allowing foreign (sharia "law") courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it's obviously TREASON.

Nation-hating leftist racists love islam because it's full of poor oppressed angry violent noble swarthy savages who hate the idea of nations as much as they do! They think they can control muslims by coddling them, and aim the muslims at their mutual enemies - at the hard-working civilized patriotic nationalists.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (30) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2Sayyid el-Qimni and the words Jihad and Islamophobia [112 words]dhimmi no moreJun 13, 2016 18:12229982
4The amazing Sayyid el-Qimni [272 words]dhimmi no moreJun 11, 2016 07:36229937
2"Qur'an is a historical text, not perfect for all times and all places" [109 words]AVJun 27, 2016 00:29229937
Qu'ran is a text defined by abrogation to be used as convenience suits ... [176 words]kmanJul 21, 2016 17:24229937
2Secularists in Egypt [97 words]dhimmi no moreJun 5, 2016 10:25229834
1Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful [634 words]Michael SJun 7, 2016 15:53229834
1al-Bukhari and lice! [121 words]dhimmi no moreJun 9, 2016 06:52229834
The knife is ready... [242 words]Michael SJun 11, 2016 22:04229834
Get Serious About Identifying Competent Identifiers [177 words]DaveMay 28, 2016 18:42229711
French lives matter [96 words]JeffMay 27, 2016 10:53229698
The French have generally been good friends to the US [136 words]Michael SMay 31, 2016 14:53229698
Agreed [115 words]JeffJun 2, 2016 22:14229698
Western friends [211 words]Michael SJun 7, 2016 07:22229698
Identifying Islamists - an unworkable proposition! [334 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Rich McMahonMay 25, 2016 12:24229661
2how do we assess Islamic deception and dissimulation ? [141 words]Paul ChristopherJun 14, 2016 05:16229661
overdue article;subject on American safety;lives [55 words]Don MarshMay 25, 2016 10:43229658
overdue article;subject on American safety;lives [55 words]Don MarshMay 25, 2016 10:42229657
2المتأسلمين al-Muta'slmeen instead of الاسلاميون or al-Islamiyuun [106 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreMay 24, 2016 18:23229644
Early sign for identifying Islamists [16 words]ArnieMay 24, 2016 11:33229643
2Finally Getting Serious....... [89 words]martybetteMay 24, 2016 09:44229641
1THERE'S NO MONEY IN SOLUTIONS! [153 words]UNCLE VLADDIMay 26, 2016 17:05229641
Getting Serious about Identifying Islamists [1819 words]Vishu MenonMay 24, 2016 06:59229639
1Why fear the Muslims? These typical American kids will put a chill up your spine. [147 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Michael SMay 24, 2016 06:02229637
Would Bill Ayers be vetted? [75 words]Michael SMay 26, 2016 14:51229637
More Draconian Than Trump [124 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
BillMay 23, 2016 22:41229631
Screening for terrorists. [43 words]donMay 23, 2016 22:24229630
2HOW TO DETECT "ISLAMISTS"101: [53 words]UNCLE VLADDIMay 23, 2016 21:15229628
5How to recognize an Islamist? [70 words]PrashantJun 2, 2016 02:05229628
2WHY DO LEFTISTS ENDORSE ISLAM? [559 words]UNCLE VLADDIJun 2, 2016 16:51229628
1Not serious [20 words]MarkMay 23, 2016 20:09229621

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to WHY DO LEFTISTS ENDORSE ISLAM? by UNCLE VLADDI

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)