71 readers online now

98,582 comments by 26,202 readers

Go to Mobile Site
Homepage Articles Blog Reviews Spoken Books Other Languages Biographical Middle East Forum About this site Mailing List

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

• Computers
• Electronics
• Communication
• Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Nuclear Hamas
Reader comment on item: Hamas vs. America

Submitted by Frederick (Israel), May 8, 2005 at 13:44

Both Hamas and Hezbollah are supported by Syria and Iran, and both are in "Democratization" phases, increasing their peaceful image in Lebanon and Israel/Palestine, respectively. Iran is currently building a nuclear arsenal.

Isn't reasonable to ask if the democratization and calmness of both Hamas and Hezbollah is just the cover for waiting until Iran gives them the bomb? Or that Iran has suppressed their activities to tranquilize the West while the bomb-making goes on?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (31) on this item

Title By Date
Here's the deal Hamas: your leg for my eye. Got it? [60 words]David Reynolds JanusFeb 6, 2006 19:27
Hamas: is it true what we see [60 words]NalioNov 3, 2005 08:53
↔ Reality Check [134 words]Edwina SaidApr 16, 2006 07:50
↔ Check that "Reality Check" [36 words]MaxMar 25, 2008 11:59
A cry in the wilderness [66 words]S.C.PandaMay 28, 2005 08:19
Hamas Terrorists vs The Nazi "Action" Squads [236 words]Dave M. O'NeillMay 10, 2005 02:40
⇒ Nuclear Hamas [74 words]FrederickMay 8, 2005 13:44
Wishing Upon Stars [246 words]John Randall PeacherMay 6, 2005 04:49
What About the 1993 WTC Bombing!?! [348 words]AlexMay 6, 2005 00:49
Muslim Group in France Is Fertile Soil for Militancy [9 words]Vishal VermaMay 5, 2005 15:57
blah, blah, blah [94 words]Donald OMay 4, 2005 19:52
Hamas must be destroyed [39 words]Marvin GoldMay 4, 2005 15:36
Hamas & Hizbollah [77 words]YovenMay 4, 2005 14:53
Infiltration [40 words]Mark HymanMay 4, 2005 08:44
Is democracy a viable concept in the Middle East? [163 words]Mike FitchmanMay 4, 2005 03:50
Is appeasement the only way out? [254 words]Michael Weiss, M.D.May 3, 2005 21:15
The White House [32 words]Dennis PreiserMay 3, 2005 21:12
Fundraising for the HAMAS fundraiser [176 words]Northern VirginiastanMay 3, 2005 18:38
Severe underestimation of threat [80 words]Arvind MadhavanMay 3, 2005 16:09
Terrorism works...a sad fact [22 words]RS BrennerMay 3, 2005 15:31
Be brave for a while .. [81 words]GalalMay 3, 2005 13:49
A voice in the wilderness [85 words]Lee D. CaryMay 3, 2005 12:39
When will they ever learn?....When will they ever learn?... [177 words]Janet Ann SuzukiMay 3, 2005 12:27
If it is true [164 words]Dray PascalMay 3, 2005 10:51
Hamas as "Professionals." [80 words]Sy DillMay 3, 2005 10:05
Agreement [68 words]Peter J. HerzMay 3, 2005 09:14
Hamas must be destroyed [37 words]Octavio JohansonMay 3, 2005 08:13
↔ Go Ahead Make Our Day [23 words]Hamas BusterJan 26, 2006 21:38
↔ AL QAEDA / HAMAS / HEZBOLLAH / ISLAMIC JIHAD !! [225 words]John SmithJan 27, 2006 14:08
↔ Adam Balm on Hamas !! [163 words]Adam BalmJan 27, 2006 16:37
↔ wool over your eyes [52 words]cloud nineJul 25, 2006 20:16

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com