Submitted by H.A.L. von Luebbert(United States), Feb 24, 2005 at 10:29
I've just finished reading, verbatim, Ward Churchill's speech. What, specifically, did he say that isn't true? Instead of the cowardice represented by efforts to silence the man by causing him to lose his job and the like, why not just prove what he says is false? Not good enough? Why not? ...
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.