2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

The New York Times and the truth

Reader comment on item: Post-Mortem on the Muhammad Protests

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 16, 2012 at 14:30

Dr. Pipes

The folks at the NYT are very aware that they just did not get the story about the atrocity in Benghazi and it is very embarrassing to those in charge of our so called newspaper of record but they are still sticking to their little lie

So now they tell us in an article today http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/libya/index.html that we all got it wrong and that it was this badly made video that is the cause of anger of Muslims. and that such anger was the reason why Islamists attacked the consulate in Benghazi and killed 3 Americans the ambassador included, when the evidence from the Arab press and from our intelligence service points to the fact that there was nothing spontaneous about such atrocity, and it had nothing to do with this video, as the NYT wrongly claimed. when the Egyptian/Arabic languagepress was telling that the embassy was being attacked by salafists to protest and to demand the freedom of the convicted terrorist so called Sheikh abd al-Rahman http://www.almesryoon.com/news.aspx?id=92080 and nothing about the video and we do not hear about it as a cause for such attack

Then on 9/8/2012 al-Nas TV which is run by salafists did show part of it on their channel and some angry salafist incited Muslims to protest such video and it could have ended there but it was more reason for those protesting at the US embassy in Cairo to continue their attack on the embassy http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/09/201291720158465768.html

The attack in Libya? It had nothing to do with the video but we are told that the reporters from the NYT were told by many unnamed witnesses that it was the video that should be blamed not realizing that the NYT fell in the biggest trap of them all and that is recall bias http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recall_bias and that their methodology became very flawed and useless

What is most amazing the NYT should have been asking: What if what Mr Nakoula is saying is correct and the thing is bizarre as it might sound there is a tradition in Ibn Ishaq where Khadija asks Muhammad to sit on her right thigh then left thigh then she takes off her khumar and I will leave the rest to your imagination but it is all in Ibn Ishaq, so Mr Nakoula was not making things up

So much for our free press

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The New York Times and the truth by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)