3 readers online now  |  69 million page views

My dear Mr. Tovey

Reader comment on item: Israel's Arabs, Living a Paradox
in response to reader comment: Posturing the Islamic Republic of Iran Against All Indications of the Holy BIble

Submitted by Debanjan Banerjee (India), Apr 29, 2012 at 09:54

" By your own argument, you are trying to say "Iran is steadfastly upholding the Biblical laws….;' an empty argument since every Islamic discourse I have encountered, including some of yours from earlier exchanges, call the Hebrew Holy Bible corrupted. Does that mean that Iran's following a path to corruption? "

My Answer : I request you Mr. Tovie to understand Islamic laws or the theological position of the Islamic republic by an ope mind. Actually Islamic law's or Sharia fundamentals are based upon the fundamentals which make The TEN commandments i.e. Mosaic law. It is true that in Islam does consider a lot of aspects of the implementation of Judeo-Christian law as corrupt but Islamic theology considers those portions which are corrupted , are the man-made portions which were added to the basic God-given portions by later Judeo-Christian luminaries. The basic law which was communicated through Musa (PBUH) or Nuh (PBUH) or Ibrahim (PBUH) are considered the supreme law for emulation and this are the fundamentals upon which Shariah is based. Those God-given portions are considered God-given and authentic since they are considered just and fair for all ages and all people , by Islam.

So please consider that Islamic republic of Iran is trying to follow in this unjust World a modicum of justice by adhering to the just and God-given portions of the Judeo-Christian legal systems. The other portions of Judeo-Christian laws (and most of modern Western laws and cultural practices) are considered as unjust and thereby unworthy of following.

to take this exchange a step further, you must realize that the 1979 incident is relevant, irrespective of your attempt to separate them; for all of it is based on Iran's theocratic introspection of its world view.

My Answer : For the sake of taking this exchange forward then let us consider the whole of 1979 incident from a historical perspective.

1. 1979 is not a separate part of history , it is a culmination of events. To realize this we need to go back to the early 20-th century.

2. UK had made an unjust and immoral division of profits from the Iranian natural resources in the early 20-th century whereby it got 84 per cent of all profits and Iran only 16 per cent.

3. The Iranian elected parliament in 1951 offered the British a 50-50 profit-sharing deal , the British replied by saying that the native inhabitants of a Muslim nation has no moral authority to question British laws irrelevant of the fairness of the law.

4. The elected Iranian parliament then decided to nationalize the Oil industry in Iran.

5. The British then decided to involve their American counterparts to overthrow the elected Iranian government and install a pro-Western regime.

6. The US embassy was used in this nefarious and immoral job.

7. Now what we see is that after 1979 Islamic revolution , the US embassy was busy in organizing a counter-revolution in Iran so the Iranian people who were aware and rightly resentful of the past immoral Western actions decided to act to preserve their sovereignity.

8. Now through out this hostage crisis no one was hurt , no one was killed or harmed in any way. The main objective of the hostage takers was to collect all the documents which talked about Western immoral involvement with the Shah regime in Iran.

9. All the hostages were released without any harm. None of them were tortured in any way which cripples them in both body and mind.

10. Compare Iranian embassy hostage taking to the hostages who are currently held by the American state in places like Guantanamo bay , Bagram in Afghanistan and numerous torture centres run by the CIA all over the whole World. Even American citizens without any legal involvement are held in these prisons without any trial and being tortured by their CIA captors without any rights. So since you consider yourself as Christian please consider whether torturing of innocents is considered as unjust in Judeo-Christian realm.

Until now I am yet to see any sufficient criticism of the torturing and hostage taking by the American state from the Christians like you in the USA. That is unjust I believe.

Regarding homosexuality , if a homosexual person desists from his immoral and unnatural and unjust actions then the Islamic republic desists from treating him as a law breaker.

Only when a homosexual person in question tries to spread this immoral actions to others , that person is judged as spreading falsehood and corruption and acting against the will and word of God.

That person is still given a chance by the Islamic justice system in Iran , to repent to Almighty , mend his ways and then he ca be acquitted.

If the person in question does not act in these ways , then of course he is considered as guilty and given the sentence of justice according to the Islamic laws which are based upon the fundamentals of Judeo-Christian laws.

Regarding Iran's doing of business , can you kindly provide to me what is the Judeo-Christian way of doing business ? Is Interest taking also now days fall within the moral way of doing business which I believe is exactly the way business now days is being carried out in the Judeo-Christian West and Israel ? Before we judge about Iran's way of doing business , can you kindly tell me whether the Judeo-Christian west is following its own laws what it considers as its legal heritage ?

Another point here is that why there is no strong Christian movement in the West or in Israel to abolish the immoral practice of interest taking ?

If the statement by President Ahmadinejad desiring to 'wipe Israel off the map' is fictional in your mind, then practice your Farsi and listen to his address some time back in which he said just exactly that. You have rebutted nothing and neither has President Ahmadinejad recanted his position.

My Answer : Israeli high-level official Dan Merridor has himself said that President Ahmedinajad was intentionally misquoted for political issues by the Israeli side. Here is the URL (http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/talktojazeera/2012/04/2012413151613293582.html)

I request you to clearly review this thoroughly and come back to me with your feedback.

Regarding Iran's peaceful intentions in the region , if I am correct Iran is yet to attack a single sovereign country in the region.

If I am correct it is Iran which has engaged in the political reconciliation in places like Lebanon and Iraq (and even now in Syria) and undoubtedly this is what has helped in bring better piece in Lebanon and Iraq.

Consider Lebanon in the times of Israeli and US intervention and consider what it is now. I would definitely love to live in current Lebanon as a citizen than what it was two decades ago under Israeli occupation.

I would love to know your viewpoints on this one.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (87) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Arabs and Israel [151 words]Ilbert PhillipsJul 11, 2012 06:44197148
Hebrew speaking Israeli-Arabs Muslims spray anti-Semitic grafitti at Yad Vashem [43 words]NinaJun 11, 2012 12:37196242
Mr. Pipes Do not you think you still live in the ideas of the past [432 words]Younis Bani YounesMay 6, 2012 20:13195477
1Considering the Source [219 words]M. ToveyMay 8, 2012 13:40195477
Israel was reconstituted as a Jewish Statre [1085 words]YJ DraimanFeb 28, 2016 18:47195477
Israel is a Jewish State first and foremost [693 words]YJ DraimanMay 22, 2016 01:06195477
Results of an advertising experiment to Israeli Arab and Orthodox Jewish newspapers for Independence Day [117 words]PezDispenserApr 23, 2012 12:56195238
Arabs in Israel: Friends or Foes? [13 words]Mladen AndrijasevicApr 7, 2012 05:35195012
1The dilemma of Arab discontent within Israel [336 words]Gerald A. HonigmanApr 2, 2012 20:52194919
1The Muslim Threat. [505 words]David J FeigerApr 3, 2012 20:36194919
sports [40 words]mythMar 29, 2012 11:09194853
Split the land and split the population [35 words]J RMar 28, 2012 10:33194830
Motivation for the opinions that I expressed [75 words]J RMar 29, 2012 07:16194830
1Separation of Israel is NOT an Option - The World Will Not Survive the Repercussions [311 words]M. ToveyMay 9, 2012 18:44194830
1Arab paradox and Israels dysfunctional response [268 words]Sigmund DermanMar 25, 2012 23:44194771
7Jewish state is for Jews, just like Japan is for Japanese and Arabia for Arabs [145 words]VivartoMar 25, 2012 21:27194767
Israel's Arabs, Living a Paradox [190 words]Balarabe AbbaMar 24, 2012 13:29194734
But Please [45 words]Jay1Mar 24, 2012 09:19194725
1Problems Israel needs to solve [187 words]Lorna SalzmanMar 23, 2012 13:16194697
1Arab Christians [66 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
UgriMar 23, 2012 12:06194695
1Arab Catholics [14 words]Lujack SkylarkMar 24, 2012 00:00194695
Dear Ugri [255 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 24, 2012 10:12194695
Arab Christians [86 words]Martin KatchenMar 27, 2012 19:59194695
Thanks for the elucidation. [43 words]UgriMar 29, 2012 04:48194695
The newly revealed internal EU documents and the younger generation of Israeli Arabs [245 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Pez DispenserMar 23, 2012 04:45194689
The new co-priority of the anti-Israel far left? [107 words]PezDispenserAug 5, 2013 14:57194689
1Judaizing" the Arab-Israelis [261 words]NuritGMar 23, 2012 03:10194688
What about Howard Zinn? [352 words]Wallace Edward BrandMar 23, 2012 20:22194688
You are unfortunately so right [182 words]saraMar 24, 2012 17:43194688
What about Howard Zinn? [71 words]NuritGMar 24, 2012 21:48194688
Judaising the Arabs [386 words]Martin KatchenMar 27, 2012 16:04194688
The DNA issue [140 words]DEBORAH THE JUDGEApr 1, 2012 01:17194688
1right diagnosis, wrong prescription [120 words]arielMar 23, 2012 02:41194687
4Remember the Quraysh! [652 words]Wallace Edward BrandMar 24, 2012 00:32194687
pay and leave [117 words]mythMar 24, 2012 06:00194687
1Russia is the root of Islamist proliferation [335 words]saraMar 24, 2012 16:35194687
1Why has Pacepa been ignored on the cause of global terrorism and on the cause of the Arab Israeli conflict? [149 words]Wallace Edward BrandMar 24, 2012 22:27194687
great reference, thanks [76 words]saraMar 26, 2012 16:07194687
How Arafat was selected to head up the PLO. -- reply to sara [132 words]Wallace Edward BrandMar 26, 2012 22:27194687
Pacepa goes into some detail about Arafat's training by the KGB here [702 words]saraMar 27, 2012 19:23194687
I agree with ariel. Israel's safe future depend on changing the demography . [35 words]BenApr 2, 2012 13:58194687
Balderdash (response to: Russia is the root of Islamist proliferation ) [216 words]RobertJan 18, 2013 12:04194687
Balderdash is a bit harsh [114 words]saraJan 18, 2013 20:09194687
Israel will prevail [46 words]D. KrabbenhoftMar 23, 2012 01:22194686
How logic leads to new definitions [138 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David ZoharMar 23, 2012 00:33194682
6Israeli and Palestinian Arabs: Might some of them be anusim and potential Jews? [683 words]Martin H. KatchenMar 22, 2012 22:41194678
Uh-Oh [10 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Barry BlackMar 22, 2012 21:03194676
A one lawful state West of the Jordan River as a solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict [7 words]Wallace Edward BrandMar 22, 2012 22:31194676
Restriction of Muslim poplulation growth is essential. [95 words]Canto28Mar 22, 2012 20:18194674
1Conversion is the only way to restrict the growth [262 words]PrashantMar 23, 2012 00:48194674
1They Hate Israel, But They Love Israel's Cash [103 words]DaveMar 22, 2012 15:26194670
Israel's Arabs Living a Paradox [139 words]Dan RusenMar 22, 2012 13:39194668
question about growing up in israel [70 words]mythMar 23, 2012 09:20194668
1Growing up in Israel [137 words]saraMar 23, 2012 16:28194668
Raising Arab Children in Israel [128 words]Dan RusenMar 23, 2012 17:24194668
The policy of the Jewish immigration law was mandated in 1920 [147 words]Wallace Edward BrandMar 22, 2012 12:17194666
1The Pal. paradox [69 words]steven LMar 22, 2012 11:52194664
Good suggestions the US should follow [233 words]Ron ThompsonMar 22, 2012 11:23194661
observation -- implications for all of the West? [45 words]MarkMar 22, 2012 10:36194656
1The Voice of Reason amid the Din of Insanity [34 words]Gila HirshMar 22, 2012 09:57194655
Israel in the Club of Democracies [90 words]Chad NagleMar 22, 2012 09:56194654
3Israeli Arabs [108 words]RickardMar 22, 2012 09:52194653
The Word has the answers [117 words]DEBORAH THE JUDGEMar 22, 2012 09:47194652
Reminds me of Batman [25 words]fdMar 22, 2012 23:51194652
Dual Loyalties [51 words]EthanPMar 22, 2012 08:47194651
Stop immigration into US alao [22 words]WestieMar 22, 2012 08:06194649
Mr Pipes is well ahead of the game [81 words]StanMar 22, 2012 07:18194647
4Israel should stick to the terms of the Ottoman cession of Sovereignty, the British Mandate and the Balfour Declatiion [886 words]Wallace Edward BrandMar 22, 2012 23:39194647
My reply to Wallace Edward Brand [147 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 24, 2012 10:27194647
1There goes he again [60 words]PrashantMar 25, 2012 18:21194647
A Reply for Debanjan Banerjee - A Zionist Israel - A Reality of the Tanach [257 words]M. ToveyApr 17, 2012 11:15194647
Dear Mr. Tovi [414 words]Debanjan BanerjeeApr 23, 2012 02:35194647
Posturing the Islamic Republic of Iran Against Israel [919 words]M. ToveyApr 24, 2012 19:15194647
My reply to Mr. M Tovey [470 words]Debanjan BanerjeeApr 25, 2012 23:45194647
Posturing the Islamic Republic of Iran Against All Indications of the Holy BIble [465 words]M. ToveyApr 26, 2012 18:39194647
2Debanjan's lies continue [53 words]PrashantApr 27, 2012 06:53194647
My dear Mr. Tovey [1155 words]Debanjan BanerjeeApr 29, 2012 09:54194647
Paradox: Sunni vs Shiite - Why Neither Understand Israel [1177 words]M. ToveyMay 1, 2012 12:21194647
My reply to Mr. Tovie [782 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMay 3, 2012 23:54194647
Individual and Corporate Responsiblilities - Judging True Judgment over the Paradox [323 words]M. ToveyMay 4, 2012 18:26194647
English translation "wipe Israel off the face of the earth was official" [26 words]Wallace Edward BrandFeb 22, 2013 16:50194647
Judea and Samaria is Jewish territory - No annexation is required [127 words]YJ DraimanJun 29, 2015 03:16194647
1Why avoid reality? [117 words]Y Brandstetter MDMar 22, 2012 06:35194645
1Living in paradox or paradise???? [75 words]FroikeMar 23, 2012 12:05194645
1Quality of life [141 words]Y Brandstetter MDMar 24, 2012 14:42194645
I Concur.....Amen Amen Amen, Selah Selah Selah! [14 words]FroikeMar 25, 2012 10:48194645
amazing ! [95 words]ibuzoneMar 22, 2012 05:53194643

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to My dear Mr. Tovey by Debanjan Banerjee

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List


eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)