IS DEFENDING MILLIONS OF ISRAELIS NOT INCLUDED IN "OBAMA'S HUMANITARIAN" MISSION?

Submitted by Maria Jose (Mexico), Apr 3, 2011 at 17:29

IS DEFENDING MILLIONS OF ISRAELIS NOT INCLUDED IN "OBAMA'S HUMANITARIAN" MISSION?

April, 2011

Obama Welcomes Arab League Support for Libyan People - 13 Mar 2011
http://www.america.gov/st/peacesec-english/2011/March/20110313143440elrem0.5616861.html

Libya's Backseat Drivers - Claudia Rosett - National Review Online - 23 Mar 2011 ... Barack Obama is tempted to follow the leadership of the Arab League, he'll think twice.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/262806/libyas-backseat-drivers-claudia-rosett

Obama's "Humanitarian" War to Cause Major Earthquake in America?
John Lillipop | April 2, 2011
http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2011/04/obamas-humanitarian-war-to-cause-major-earthquake-in-america/

ACCEPTANCE DESPITE HYPOCRISY

The sincerity of Obama in his argument is irrelevant, since the argument was accepted, though critics expose the hypocrisy and murdered in cold blood by the Islamic Republic's notorious cruel Basij militias and Iranian Revolutionary Guards.
-Syria's prison State where the true numbers are hard to figure out in that tightly closed totalitarian, but at least over a hundred have been massacred by the oppressive Syrian Arab Republic.
-In the Sudan, where they just voted for independence from the Arab racist dominated regime in Khartoum after years of the biggest calamity since WW2, the genocide, costing the lives of 2,500,000. In March (2011), at least 70 died in Northern Sudan's aggression.

Nevertheless the argument for "rescuing civilians" the humanitarian pan, finds ears in the US.

ISRAEL'S STRUGGLE AND CONCERN [IS ONLY] FOR SURVIVAL

Though distracters among Arabists (and their helpers) try to divert the issue, time and time again. The truth must be told, Israel's worry and actions were always about survival.
As someone in Congress has put it so eloquently: "since when do we demand that responses to naked aggression and intended genocide be proportionate?"
The undeniable fact of Israel, Jews in Israel/Palestine facing the constant threat of genocide at least since the 1920s must be reminded, lest we lose focus on the bigger picture.

• The Islamic leader of Arab Palestine, the Mufti, cried out to the "believers" in the 1920's, 1930's and in the 1940s to simply 'kill Jews.'
• In 1948: Determined to drive the Jews into annihilation, the Arab League prepared for war.
  "The five Arab armies of Egypt, Syria, Transjordan, Lebanon and Iraq immediately invaded the new microstate one day one day earlier. Their combined intention was expressed publicly by Azzam Pesha, Secretary General of the Arab League on May 15: "This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian masssacres and the Crusades."
• In 1967, Egypt's Nasser was planning a Pan-Arab invasion to eradicate Israel, he declared, a few days before the war, (PBS:) "Our main task is to destroy Israel." (BBC:) "Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel." Syria's Assad: "It is time to embark on a war of annihilation." The same sentiments were voiced in 1973.
• The PLO, in its early days 1964-1990S, was openly dedicated to the annihilation of Israel.
• Islamic Republic of Iran declared the will/plan of 'annihilation of Israel' in: 1994, in 2005, (it was not mistranslated), in 2007 and in 2010.
• Hamas & Hezbollah, both have a genocidal agenda
• Hamas: "The Final Goal of the Resistance is to Wipe This Entity Off the Face of the Earth" "We are making the preparations for a confrontation. This is not because we need to be prepared for an Israeli act of aggression - after all, aggression is intrinsic to this entity - but because the final goal of the resistance is to wipe this entity off the face of the Earth. This goal necessitates the development of the capabilities of the resistance, until this entity is wiped out."
  In its documents the 'Hamas makes no secret of its goal to annihilate Israel through violent means and jihad, to be replaced by a "whole and indivisible Palestine" as a Muslim state.'
  It vows to "Drink the blood of the Jews".
  Fact is Hamas regime has not only repeatedly pledged itself to the annihilation of Israel and the torpedoing of any prospects for Middle East peace, but has made good on its pledges...
  Palestinian Muslim cleric even urges to kill all Americans.
• Fatah, Mahmoud Abbas' 'Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade' is not much better.
• From Hezbollah's goal: "the essence of which is to wear down Israel until its final annihilation".
• Even "moderate" Palestinian Authority is not exempt from inciting genocide on (any) Jews, like Nazi type sermon by Mullah on its official TV in 2010.

PROTECTING ISRAELI AND ARAB CIVILIANS UNDER THREAT FROM HAMAS/FATAH'S "AL-AQSA" BRIGADE/HEZBOLLAH

Further more, since both, the Arab-Palestinian regime in Gaza - Hamas and Iran-Syria proxy Islamic terror group in Lebanon Hezbollah, hold their own civilian population hostage and aim at Israeli civilians. Every help Israel can get to combat these forces, thus minimizing both Arab and Israeli civilian casualties, should be as much 'humanitarian' as Libyans are.

CONCLUSION

If the 'humanitarian argument' holds any water in Obama's policy vis-à-vis Libya, so can be -to say the least- the argument be made for any action against 1) Iran (not to mention actions against Nuclear Iran - the perfect world disaster). 2) Syria, the catch: clearly the racist Arab League couldn't care less for Arab civilians as long as the regime is anti-Jewish. 3) Iran/Syria's Hezbollah arm (actually from the US stand, American people have lost more lives to Hezbollah than to Gadhafi). 4) Against radical Arab Palestine.
(And any diversion such as blaming the so-called "settlements" or the like, can not be used to hinder the survival of Israeli innocent civilians. Need we say more?)

As long as there is a double standard and civilians whose agenda is not the Arab League's. It only reaffirms the criminal shame, that that Goliath Arab League Lobby not only dictates the UN and Amnesty but US foreign policy as well.

A minimum of honesty from the Obama's admin. would be nice. Like: 'We went into Libya because the Arab League pushed/forced us to.' To paraphrase Obamanism to Obama himself: A bit of "transparency" wouldn't hurt for a "change."

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".