Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Why they make excuses
Reader comment on item: Explaining the Murder Rampage atop the Empire State Building

Submitted by Ken (United States), Nov 9, 2009 at 20:03

In my opinion, to deny terrorism, in the face of glaring evidence, is to avert an anti-terrorism failure.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (12) on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Why they make excuses [18 words]KenNov 9, 2009 20:03
Explaining Murder Rampage at Empire State Building [166 words]Barbara PaolucciNov 4, 2007 14:48
linda kamal [255 words]YnnatchkahMay 30, 2007 01:56
What were the assumed grievances against the tourist? [31 words]M.D'SouzaMay 29, 2007 11:01
Dupes and accomplices [66 words]David W. LincolnMay 28, 2007 23:38
Empire State Building Terrorist [49 words]BobMay 28, 2007 16:47
Explaining Murder Rampage at Empire State Building [172 words]BarbaraMay 28, 2007 14:58
TO Barbara. [171 words]Ynnatchkah Dievietchkah KharoshayaMay 29, 2007 08:55
Murder Rampage atop Empire State Building - my reply to those who submitted their comments [215 words]BarbaraMay 29, 2007 19:06
A TROUBLING ISSUE [122 words]DANIEL REDMONDOct 27, 2007 19:38
to those who responded to Murder Rampage atop Empire State Bldg. [99 words]Barbara PaolucciNov 2, 2007 09:46
REPLY TO MS. PAOLUCCI [320 words]DANIEL REDMONDNov 2, 2007 18:04

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page