| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), May 30, 2007 at 01:56
"Explained" "...His goal was patriotic"...So to kill innocents to this official and openly supporter of terrorism is to be patriotic....Yet, she gets her daily bread financed by American Taxes cash, that nevertheless is hallal, even tough she finds correct to kill Americans as a support for her father and her family terrorism.
Nobody did nothing. So, what has her next generation already learned?
1. Terrorism pays and guarantees shahadah with no pain.
2. No problem, your family will have a good life in the US, for what they are not guilty for your crimes, thus being endorsed and nurtured by immunity.
3. Linda can also explode herself and kill Innocent human beings, for what her family will not suffer not even financial sanctions. Shahadah and Luxury befire and after death...wow.
4. The UN supports this sub humanity and no court charges her financial assets to support the victims of her fathers' heinous crimes, not for a moment condemned by her, but openly and chutzpah-ly condoned.
Is is a pattern -potentially speaking- to be followed by many muslims in the US?
A couple of months ago, in Seattle it happened and looks like people barely learned .....
Very probably is is a pattern to be followed...as Arafat said once, if you cannot destroy Israel at once, you can do so piece by piece..
So if you cannot destroy the US at once, you can do so piece by piece, always condoned by the US leftists' lethargy and its cheap leftists oppressors- most also imperialists and capitalists...
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Why they make excuses [18 words] | Ken | Nov 9, 2009 20:03 |
| Explaining Murder Rampage at Empire State Building [166 words] | Barbara Paolucci | Nov 4, 2007 14:48 |
| ⇒ linda kamal [255 words] | Ynnatchkah | May 30, 2007 01:56 |
| What were the assumed grievances against the tourist? [31 words] | M.D'Souza | May 29, 2007 11:01 |
| Dupes and accomplices [66 words] | David W. Lincoln | May 28, 2007 23:38 |
| Empire State Building Terrorist [49 words] | Bob | May 28, 2007 16:47 |
| Explaining Murder Rampage at Empire State Building [172 words] | Barbara | May 28, 2007 14:58 |
| ↔ TO Barbara. [171 words] | Ynnatchkah Dievietchkah Kharoshaya | May 29, 2007 08:55 |
| ↔ Murder Rampage atop Empire State Building - my reply to those who submitted their comments [215 words] | Barbara | May 29, 2007 19:06 |
| ↔ A TROUBLING ISSUE [122 words] | DANIEL REDMOND | Oct 27, 2007 19:38 |
| ↔ to those who responded to Murder Rampage atop Empire State Bldg. [99 words] | Barbara Paolucci | Nov 2, 2007 09:46 |
| ↔ REPLY TO MS. PAOLUCCI [320 words] | DANIEL REDMOND | Nov 2, 2007 18:04 |