|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Going too farReader comment on item: Institutions Push Back Against Head Coverings Submitted by sam (United States), Apr 5, 2009 at 03:59 Let me start with saying that I am supportive of not giving any particular religion special privileges. Having said that, asking woman who covered their hair to remove the covering is going too far. But I doubt if a Catholic Nun, US active duty soldier, Rabbi with yarmulk came to the Bank they would have enforced it. Show me, independently that some cloth over a person's hair covering is stopping the bank to conduct their job effectively ? Full face covering, using sunglasses are different category Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Submitting....
<< Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (15) on this item
Comment on this item
|
ADVERTISEMENTS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2013 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||