33 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Equating One Specious Argument With Another In Legitimizing Forms of Racism
Reader comment on item: Israelis Insult Muslims, Face Criminal Charges

Submitted by Renee Bouvier (United States), Mar 9, 2009 at 11:42

"No Muslims - No Terrorism" is not the same as "No Arabs - No Terrorism." Many of the people on Wall Street, operating the various financial institutions and organizations, and the actual bankers themselves here in the United States are Jewish. So one could easily create a specious argument or syllogism of "No Jews - No Malfeasance" in the United States, especially if one is a victim of the likes of Bernard Madoff.

Singling out an entire racial, ethnic group for elimination and/or expulsion is not the same as criticizing a religion and/or religious belief. It is not only acceptable, but legitimate, to criticize and condemn antiquated religious belief and dangerous ideology. Whereas, it is not legitimate to encourage the extermination and/or expulsion of an entire people, just because a significant sector of its population is causing a lot of pain and suffering to everyone else, including members of their own racial/ethnic group. If one wants to create a resolution to the violence and to the hatred, one must invest in creating an institution, and thereby a culture, which will preclude the growth and flourishing of any type or degree of hatred and racism towards any ethic/racial group and/or entity.

So far, no one in the world wants to make this investment, because they seem to be way too comfortable with their practices of the Bronze Age and antiquated belief systems. Religious belief and other forms of exclusive ideology evidently cause problems -- not people. The fact that people are so easily inculcated into hating another people is the problem. How do we educate the masses into thinking for themselves instead easily being brainwashed into hating "the other?" That's the problem. We should be rejoicing over our differences as human beings; instead, we are hating and killing each other over our differences. Two wrongs do not make a right.

Just because certain individuals on one side of the equation are advocating a final solution, encompassing all sorts of hatred, killing, and racism, does not make it legitimate for individuals on the other side of the equation to likewise practice such hatred. Should the Jews reciprocate in kind by creating their own suicide bombing squads to kill thousands upon thousands of Arab Muslims? After all, the Jews have proven many times over that they are extremely capable, perhaps more capable than their adversaries, in accomplishing and competing in a similar task.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (2) on this item

Title By Date
⇒ Equating One Specious Argument With Another In Legitimizing Forms of Racism [400 words]Renee BouvierMar 9, 2009 11:42
Buying Into the Enemy's Dogma [156 words]Mark S. DevenowMar 8, 2009 17:45

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.