Try again Yazid.
Reader comment on item: Kamal Nawash
in response to reader comment: Kamal Nawash is a GREAT Attorney

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Jul 21, 2008 at 03:42

"Dear" Habyby Yazid:

1. If you just "stumble" on this site while looking for attorney Kamal Nawash, how you explain the fact that you came upon the second paragraph of your writing with such perfection in his e-address?

So, you did not just stumble, but accessed on purpose as a support for your Islamist Fellow or you do not quite understand the application of the word stumble.

And, you could not help read the negative notes, excuse-me?

If you were looking for Nawash, so directly, why would a person in full necessity of contacting his attorney, waste time in replying to Nick (a no-one)?

Very deceiving Yazid. Bad try.....

2. And then Habbyby Yazid proceeds by using Dr. Pipes Blog's to make his small propaganda about Nawash business- FOR FREE- a free lunch, while not even touching the main issue of the article not what nick exposed in his writings, by advising in advance that he needs a good attorney?

3. And, if Mr. Nawash was your attorney three years ago for what you say a divorce, why again would you lose his contact? Isn't that obvious that an attorney with such a "magnitude" would have a personal domain? This is pre history in the Internet Era, Yazid.

4. Mick's writings suggest?

Come on Yazid....Would you open your files concerning identity, in addition to what clients Nawash defended, so anyone could dig into his efficiency and whom he gladly supports? B/c Nawash can still be a good lawyer, but ones should give his certificate of stupidity or Islamist support, when hiring him for ANY Business.

I personally do Not believe in your accidental access-basing my judgment upon your own words; moreover, looks like that the self proclaimed prophet muhamad did not teach Islamists how to Al Taqyia intelligently, precisely why, after playing sassy girls and Islam victimhood, all Islamists have is the imperialism and oil oppression, allied to the law of the sword: the most perfect corroboration ...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.