Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Apprenticing
Reader comment on item: Assessing the American-Led Effort in Iraq

Submitted by David W. Lincoln (Canada), Dec 17, 2007 at 23:01

Until such time as high tech equipment can be handled by Iraqis, the surest way to get them proficient in them is for them to serve as apprentices. We have apprentices here in North America,, and are the apprentices second class workers? Hardly. So, why the reluctance for that to be the case in Iraq?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title By Date
Assessing the American -Led effort in Iraq [627 words]kim segarDec 20, 2007 14:03
Corruption [23 words]aspaciaDec 18, 2007 07:48
⇒ Apprenticing [55 words]David W. LincolnDec 17, 2007 23:01
This is correct but if I may add [148 words]IKDec 17, 2007 18:17
Elphantine Embassy complex [72 words]AyashaDec 17, 2007 13:08
"Let Iraqis Run Iraq" [93 words]David S. LevineDec 17, 2007 12:56
Why muslim countries are falling apart [467 words]R_notDec 17, 2007 10:46
The Long War [136 words]Reporting IslaamDec 17, 2007 03:31

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page