| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by EM (Canada), Sep 21, 2007 at 10:15
You gave very little thoughts about the writing of the law you propose: how can legislators ban the burqa without banning the Catholic nun coiffe, the Sikh turban or the Jewish skullcap? And what about ordinary people who wear a scarf for practical or fashion reasons? What about cancer chemotherapy patients who wear a scarf over their bald heads?
The minute an anti-burqa law is enforced, thousands of ACLU people and leftists of all colours will deliberately walk and work with burquas, thus turning this ban in ridicule.
When calling for a ban on a piece of clothing, you think no higher than the Mullahs with their absurd rules. Instead, you should call for laws prohibiting the promotion of hate, violence and treason, including within religious meetings, and call for creating mechanisms to legally monitor speech, including private speech.
If you think such a law will be difficult to write, vote and enforce, tell yourself it will be much easier than an anti-head covering law.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Daniel Pipes replies:
My problem is not with head coverings but with face coverings. As I established at "Ban the Burqa - and the Niqab Too," these are often accessories to crime and other dangers to security.
As for laws banning the promotion of hate - no way. Fortunately, the First Amendment rules in the United States. Unlike Canada.
| Title | By | Date |
| How it started [79 words] | David W. Lincoln | Sep 21, 2007 10:29 |
| ⇒ One cannot legislate a piece of rag! [w/response] [165 words] | EM | Sep 21, 2007 10:15 |
| Covered heads, covered hearts [265 words] | Linda | Aug 10, 2007 00:31 |
| Shades of the Klu Klux Klan [45 words] | Ted | Aug 4, 2007 09:21 |
| Great Blog [7 words] | owen splitorff | Aug 3, 2007 13:13 |
| On the latest article in the Jerusalem Post Internet Edition [169 words] | Noach Stern | Aug 2, 2007 00:23 |
| ↔ An advice [395 words] | Peace | Aug 20, 2007 05:14 |
| ↔ this is a lie! [79 words] | Kumbara Gerdot | Oct 4, 2007 20:07 |