Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

One cannot legislate a piece of rag!
Reader comment on item: Bibliography – My Writings on Burqas, Niqabs, Jilbabs, Chadors, Hijabs, and other Islamic Coverings

Submitted by EM (Canada), Sep 21, 2007 at 10:15

You gave very little thoughts about the writing of the law you propose: how can legislators ban the burqa without banning the Catholic nun coiffe, the Sikh turban or the Jewish skullcap? And what about ordinary people who wear a scarf for practical or fashion reasons? What about cancer chemotherapy patients who wear a scarf over their bald heads?

The minute an anti-burqa law is enforced, thousands of ACLU people and leftists of all colours will deliberately walk and work with burquas, thus turning this ban in ridicule.

When calling for a ban on a piece of clothing, you think no higher than the Mullahs with their absurd rules. Instead, you should call for laws prohibiting the promotion of hate, violence and treason, including within religious meetings, and call for creating mechanisms to legally monitor speech, including private speech.

If you think such a law will be difficult to write, vote and enforce, tell yourself it will be much easier than an anti-head covering law.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Daniel Pipes replies:

My problem is not with head coverings but with face coverings. As I established at "Ban the Burqa - and the Niqab Too," these are often accessories to crime and other dangers to security.

As for laws banning the promotion of hate - no way. Fortunately, the First Amendment rules in the United States. Unlike Canada.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title By Date
How it started [79 words]David W. LincolnSep 21, 2007 10:29
⇒ One cannot legislate a piece of rag!
[w/response] [165 words]
EMSep 21, 2007 10:15
Covered heads, covered hearts [265 words]LindaAug 10, 2007 00:31
Shades of the Klu Klux Klan [45 words]TedAug 4, 2007 09:21
Great Blog [7 words]owen splitorffAug 3, 2007 13:13
On the latest article in the Jerusalem Post Internet Edition [169 words]Noach SternAug 2, 2007 00:23
An advice [395 words]PeaceAug 20, 2007 05:14
this is a lie! [79 words]Kumbara GerdotOct 4, 2007 20:07

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page