More CAIR Dirty Tricks against Me

by Daniel Pipes
Thu, 15 Nov 2007
updated Mon, 26 Nov 2007

Send

Comment

RSS

Judging by its MSM press clippings, one would think the Council on American-Islamic Relations is an innocuous civil-rights group along the lines of the Catholic League or the Anti-Defamation League. To take one example of many, in "Muslim Civil Rights Group Marks 10 Years of Advocacy," the Religion News Service informs readers that CAIR "is in a unique position to track discrimination against Arabs and Muslims, and educate the American public about the world's second-largest religion." There is not a hint of criticism, not a thing to suggest to readers that this is anything but a wholesome addition to North American democratic life.

But I know otherwise, and I recently collected some of CAIR's unethical steps at "CAIR's Dirty Tricks against Me." Here are others worthy of note, in reverse chronological order:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spitting incident: An altercation took place outside a talk I gave on Oct. 30 at Florida Atlantic University; Joe Kaufman describes how CAIR exploited it:

Evidently, during the protest, one of the demonstrators, Sana Akhtar, was spat upon (or near) by an attendee. The attendee, an FAU employee, thought better of what she had done and apologized for the incident, and Akhtar did not press charges. Normally, that would be the end of it, but when it comes to CAIR, it's just the beginning. CAIR saw the spitting episode as an opportunity to go after Pipes. The organization issued a press release that it was holding a press conference at the entrance of the university.

The press conference consisted of about 17 supporters, the majority of which were from CAIR, the MSO and ANSWER, which stands for Act Now to Stop War and End Racism. The event was supposed to be about getting the university to issue an apology to the girl who had got spat upon (near). However, when one views the amount of statements made against Dr. Pipes at the press conference, he/she will begin to understand that the reason for it taking place had nothing to do with the girl and everything to do with the bashing of Pipes.

Kaufman goes on to give excerpts from the press conference. He concludes that CAIR "needed to call a press conference in the guise of a serious subject, in order to further the anti-Pipes hate. CAIR, in truth, has created a circus on the back of the FAU administration, using a sideshow of a girl that claimed she was spit on. This type of exploitation and deception is nothing new for CAIR." (November 26, 2007)

Muslims voting: Parvez Ahmed, wrote in the "Rhetoric undermines the war on terror," Austin American-Statesman: "Daniel Pipes questions the wisdom of allowing American Muslims to vote." I have never said such a thing; this is pure fabrication. (November 15, 2007)

Trackbacks

Links to weblogs that reference this post.
TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/777/3018b/332

Juan Cole and CAIR: Two Peas in Pod
From: Campus Watch Weblog
Excerpt: University of Michigan history professor and former president of the highly politicized Middle East Studies Association (MESA), Juan Cole is known for his boilerplate anti-Western remarks. His blog, Informed Comment, is chockfull of the stuff. This...

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title	By	Date
The Right of Israel to Exist as a Jewish State [166 words]	Barry Goldberg	Nov 30, 2007 11:39
Surprise [20 words]	Gary Ogletree	Nov 29, 2007 07:37
They have learned [40 words]	David W. Lincoln	Nov 27, 2007 11:36
Law students. [126 words]	Ynnatchkah	Nov 26, 2007 09:38
Sue the Islamic Fundamentalists [53 words]	Ynnatchkah	Nov 23, 2007 05:36
Parvez Ahmed: Master of Taqiyya [1139 words]	Abraham	Nov 22, 2007 23:49
↔ What it takes. [50 words]	Ynnatchkah	Nov 24, 2007 02:30
↔ Actually, CAIR IS being sued. [30 words]	DrRJP	Dec 11, 2007 14:19

Comment on this weblog entry

Name	Email Address (optional) Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. Top 25 recent comments Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS