Shimon Shiffer reports in Yedioth Ahronoth that in secret talks in 2010 via U.S. government mediator Frederic C. Hof, Israel's Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu agreed in principle to a full withdrawal from the Golan Heights to the June 4, 1967, lines in return for the "expectation" of Bashar al-Assad cutting ties with Iran, and that the nearly-completed negotiations ended because of the anti-Assad uprising that began in January 2011.
How plausible is this claim?
Here is a summary of the report published by Yedioth Ahronoth:
According to American sources, Netanyahu and Barak agreed to withdraw to the 1967 lines in exchange for a comprehensive peace deal that would include an Israeli "expectation" for the severing of ties between Syria and Iran. However, the sources said, the burgeoning deal did not include an explicit commitment by Assad to sever ties with the Islamic Republic.
Frederic C. Hof, U.S. government mediator between Jerusalem and Damascus.
The report said the sides did not agree on a timeline for the Israeli withdrawal: Syria wanted the agreement to be implemented within one and a half to two years, while Israel asked for more time before pulling out of the region.
Yedioth quoted a senior American official as saying that the negotiations were serious and far-reaching and would have likely ended with an agreement had they not been interrupted by the uprising against Assad. The official estimated that Netanyahu resumed the talks with Assad to justify the stalemate in the negotiations with the Palestinians and because he viewed Syria as the weak link in the so called "axis of evil," which also includes Iran, Lebanon and Hezbollah.
According to the documents written by Hof, the discussions were held at the prime minister's official residence in Jerusalem. Netanyahu and Barak kept the talks a secret, but in early 2011 a Kuwaiti newspaper reported that special US envoy Dennis Ross met Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem and said that Damascus was willing to resume talks with Israel and that the Jewish state was willing to return the Golan Heights. The Prime Minister's Office denied the report.
Yedioth said US President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were aware of the negotiations, as were Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro and Dennis Ross. Syria's representative to the talks was FM Moallem, but Hof also met with Assad, the report said.
Netanyahu's office replied to the Yedioth Ahronoth report that "This was one of many initiatives proposed to Israel over the years. Israel has never accepted that proposal. It is an old and irrelevant proposal." In contrast, the State Department partially endorsed the report: "Prior to the eruption of all of the violence in Syria, there were efforts to try to support contacts between Israel and Syrian officials. This was part of the mandate of George Mitchell."
(1) As the author of the exposé of Netanyahu's 1998 agreement to hand over the Golan Heights, "The Road to Damascus: What Netanyahu Almost Gave Away," I find this report entirely plausible. If the first-time prime minister was ready for a deal, why not the second-time prime minister? And if Netanyahu inaccurately denied the first round, why not the second one?
(2) Ariel Sharon stopped this mistaken policy the first time and the Syrian people the second time.
(3) Let's hope that the upheavals of the past two years close down these misguided ideas of reaching Arab-Israeli treaties before real reform has come to the Arabic-speaking countries. (October 14, 2012)
Mar. 28, 2013 update: Aluf Benn reports in "Assad's Israeli friend" for Ha'aretz that Damascus and Jerusalem were "very close" to an agreement in early 2011 which would have had Israel withdrawing from the Golan Heights in exchange for full peace and Syrian disengagement from Iran.
In early 2011 [Dennis] Ross and Hof came to Israel after talks with a senior Syrian government figure. According to an American source they reported that Assad was amenable and they tried to bring Netanyahu on board. "It was very close," said the source, adding that the talks did not reach the stage of detailed discussion of withdrawal phases, border demarcation and security arrangements.
May 9, 2013 update: Hurray for Lee Smith, who has written the article I'd been intending to write for two years, "The Golan Heights Chimera," in which he notes that had the many foolish ideas about Israel trading the heights to Damascus for a piece of paper (called a "peace treaty"), Syrian and perhaps Iranian troops would now be atop those heights and threatening Israel anew.
That's precisely what would have happened if America's foreign policy wise men from James Baker to Martin Indyk had their way. As recently as 2010, Indyk, a Middle East adviser to the Clinton White House and a former U.S. ambassador to Israel, was arguing that Israel should give away the Golan—in order to promote a wider peace in the Middle East. …
In the words of former Secretary of State James Baker, "a deal is there to be had." Baker pushed hardest on the Syria track at the 1991 peace conference he convened in Madrid in the hopes of forging a broader Middle East peace at the end of Cold War. While American presidents, from Ford through Clinton, had given Israel assurances that it would not have to return the Golan, Baker seems to have wanted a deal so much that this respected statesman wound up advocating the Syrian position. …
even after Baker and Bush failed, Bill Clinton's administration pushed for an Israeli-Syrian accord, premised on Israel returning the Golan—leaving Syria on top of the commanding heights from which they had regularly shelled Israeli farms and towns before the 1967 war. After Clinton's efforts came to nothing, George W. Bush was excoriated for not engaging Damascus, with Baker describing Bush's deliberate isolation of Syria as "ridiculous." …
When Barack Obama came into office promising to engage rogue regimes like the one in Damascus, the hearts of the wise men were gladdened once more. John Kerry, the man who was at the time Assad's biggest cheerleader in Washington, told The New Yorker in 2009 of his consultations with the Syrian president: "He told me he's willing to … have direct discussions with Israel over the Golan Heights—with Americans at the table. I will encourage the Administration to take him up on it."
In addition to these American politicians, one could add European, Israeli, and others. Plus the academics, from the world over who advocated a return of the Golan for that scrap of paper.
Related Topics: Arab-Israel conflict & diplomacy, Syria
receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list
This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.