	Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site
Home \| Articles \| Blog \| Reviews \| Search

Assessing the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty, Thirty Years Later

by Daniel Pipes
March 26, 2009

Send

RSS

Translations of this item:

French

I bought my first television set to watch Anwar Sadat visit Israel in November 1977 and for the next year and a half avidly and hopefully followed developments until the Egyptian and Israeli governments finally stumbled their way to signing a treaty thirty years ago today.

But I have long since given up on the treaty. In a 2006 article, "Rethinking the Egypt-Israel 'Peace' Treaty," I deemed it a "failure" for having been based on multiple fallacies and wishful predictions that:

Sadat, Carter, and Begin with great but mistaken expectations.

Once signed, agreements signed by unelected Arab leaders would convince the masses to give up their ambitions to eliminate Israel.
These agreements would be permanent, with no backsliding, much less duplicity.
Other Arab states would inevitably follow suit.
War can be concluded through negotiations rather than by one side giving up.

Given my own dim view of the treaty, I watch with interest what other observers have to say about it this week, on the occasion of its anniversary. Here is a small sampling of what others are writing and saying:

Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Egypt's foreign minister at the time of the treaty: the treaty's signing was "an event to be remembered in history for 100 years."
Abdel Moneim Saeed, head of the Al Ahram Center for Strategic and Political Studies: "If this agreement was not signed, Egypt would have fought with Israel for every single decade since."
Shimon Peres, president of Israel, addressing Husni Mubarak, president of Egypt: "even though these last 30 years were not perfect, they were a thousand times better than a continuation of the conflict and war between us."
The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs: "Even today, the peace treaty is considered a watershed event in the geopolitical situation in the Middle East, opening the gateway to peace between Israel and the Arab world, and ushering in a new agenda of diplomatic relations in the region."
Zvi Mazel, a former Israeli ambassador to Egypt: "The cold peace and escalating incitement against Israel and the Jews are not conducive to optimism. And yet peace has endured for 30 years, surviving acute crises. Does this mean it will go on? Is the will for peace going to be stronger than the vociferous opposition in Egypt? We cannot and should not be blind to the unpredictability which is one of the characteristics of the region, yet there are grounds for cautious optimism."
Aluf Benn, Ha'aretz columnist: "From the perspective of its 30-year history, the peace accord with Egypt has brought Israel huge advantages."
Barack Obama, U.S. president: "As we commemorate this historic event, we recall that peace is always possible even in the face of seemingly intractable conflicts."
The Israel Project: "Israel waited 30 years for an Arab leader to show the courage and vision to make peace. Sadat then went to Jerusalem and now Israel and Egypt have enjoyed 30 years of peace."
Kenneth Stein, professor at Emory University and a long-time aid to Jimmy Carter: "The treaty demonstrated that Middle East leaders, and not just foreign powers, have the power to transform regional politics."

As these quotes suggest, the general take on the treaty is positive. That's unfortunate, for if one misunderstands the 1979 treaty, its repetition becomes the more likely. (March 26, 2009)

Related Topics: Arab-Israel conflict & diplomacy, Egypt receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.