Should Israel initiate talks with Syria?

by Daniel Pipes
Tue, 26 Sep 2006
updated Tue, 7 Nov 2006

Send

Comment

RSS

Question asked of Jerusalem Post columnists: "Syrian President Bashar Assad told Der Spiegel that he was interested in peace and had no desire to wipe Israel off the map. Do you agree with Israeli officials who dismissed the peace overture as 'double talk', or do you believe Israel should respond by initiating talks with Syria?" For all replies, see "Burning Issues #3: Should Israel initiate talks with Syria?"

I agree with those Israelis who dismiss these overtures as meaningless. Off and on since 1991, when the Syrian leadership has perceived itself in trouble, it has turned to negotiations with Israel as a way out of its difficulties.

Until there is a change of heart in Syria, as indicated by normal relations and other signals, diplomacy is basically useless or even counterproductive. As I argued in the 'Post' in early August, a better approach is to hold Damascus responsible for troubles coming out of Lebanon. (September 26, 2006)

Related Topics: Arab-Israel conflict & diplomacy, Israel, Syria

TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/694/bcc6a/781

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title	By	Date
Invoices for missiles in South Lebanon [27 words]	Doron Zielinski	Nov 7, 2006 18:31

Comment on this weblog entry

Name:	Email Address: Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments:
Comments:
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but not hostile, libelous, or otherwise objectionable statements. Original writing only, please. For complete regulations, see Guidelines for Comments. Top 25 recent comments Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS