|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Related Articles Further Thoughts on the First French Intifada
by Daniel Pipes http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/11/further-thoughts-on-the-first-french-intifada I published a column on this topic today, "Reflections on the Revolution in France." Here are facts and thoughts that could not fit there or came later.
(November 8, 2005) Nov. 14, 2005 update: Well, Jacques Chirac has finally spoken on the rioting and, predictably, he blamed the French state, institutions, and society for the troubles, not the rioters. He not once mentions Muslims or Islam. Not understanding the causes of the problem means the wrong lessons will be learned from it, and things will only get worse. That's another reason why, as I wrote in my column, this "may be a turning point in European history." Nov. 17, 2005 update: Because tongue-tied French politicians like Chirac cannot ascribe the riots to their obvious causes – an immigrant population that rejects the ways of the indigenous majority – the best one can hope for are euphemisms. Gérard Larcher, the employment minister, provided some when he deemed it inevitable that the children of large, polygamous families would have trouble finding work. "Since part of society displays this anti-social behavior, it is not surprising that some of them have difficulty finding work." Bernard Accoyer, parliamentary leader of the UMP party, agreed: some young people behave badly because of the absence of a father figure. He also noted that the French authorities are "strangely lax" with regard to the 30,000 polygynous households in the country. Nov. 21, 2005 update: The French Ambassador to the United States, Jean-David Levitte, said that the riots were caused mostly by teenagers acting out of social and economic hardship. "It was not about the role of Islam in France. We never saw any link, direct or indirect. Religion played no role. We know that jihadists are recruiting teenagers, but this has nothing to do with the general unrest in those neighborhoods." Rather, it has to do with teenagers who want to be considered 100 percent French. "They want full equality." Comment: MilitantIslamMonitor.org asks and I second the question: "If Islam and Muslims had nothing to do with the French riots why is the French ambassador explaining that to two of the largest radical Islamic groups in the United States?" Nov. 23, 2005 update: The director of the Direction de la surveillance du territoire (DST), France's lead counterterrorist agency, says that "Islamism is not connected to the events in the suburbs, one has to find other causes." Pierre de Bousquet de Florian acknowledged that "Some of our ‘clients' have a sympathy for this movement, but it is not their motivating force." Dec. 7, 2005 update: Le Figaro notes how the minister of the interior, Nicolas Sarkozy, and the head of the Renseignements généraux (RG) differ in their interpretations of the riots. Sarkozy blames it basically on "mafias" whereas France's #1 policeman blames it on the rioters "being excluded from French society." If you ask me, this debate basically misses the point. receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||