25 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Granting Legal Immunity to Foreign Contractors in Iraq

by Daniel Pipes
Mon, 14 Jun 2004

Print Send Comment RSS Share:    

A Washington Post article today reads: "In an early test of its imminent sovereignty, Iraq's new government has been resisting a U.S. demand that thousands of foreign contractors here be granted immunity from Iraqi law, in the same way as U.S. military forces are now immune, according to Iraqi sources."

From the viewpoint of a historian of the Middle East like myself, this prospect sets off all the alarms. Through two centuries of colonial rule, there may have been no issue more irritating that extraterritoriality such as this, where one finds, according to the Post, "a special legal category, not subject to military justice and beyond the reach of Iraq's justice system." In both China and the Middle East the imposition of extraterritoriality led time and again to major problems.

Perhaps the most recent of these was in 1964 in Iran, when the shah's willingness to grant diplomatic immunity to American military advisers, their support staffs, and their families was exploited by Ayatollah Khomeini to rally the population against the shah. He responded with what Roy Mottahedeh in his 1985 book, Mantle of the Prophet, calls (pp. 245-46) one of the most influential sermons of his career, equating this "filthy vote" with the "enslavement of Iran." Passing the immunity law, Khomeini went on to state with his characteristic double-barreled rhetoric,

has acknowledged that Iran is a colony; it has given America a document attesting that the nation of Muslims is barbarous, it has struck out all our Islamic and national glories with a black line. … If the shah should run over an American dog, he would be called to account but if an American cook should run over the shah, no one has any claims against him. … I proclaim that this shameful vote of the Majles [parliament] is in contradiction to Islam and has no legality.

Mottahedeh writes that Khomeini's "appeal spoke to the feelings of enormous numbers of Iranians." His political career was thus launched, culminating in his seizure of power fifteen years later.

The U.S. government runs the risk of launching another Islamist career if it insists on extraterritoriality in Iraq. (June 14, 2004)

TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/278/5aba4/833

Comment on this weblog entry

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Top 25 recent comments
Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site ©1979-2008 Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com