1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

what more evidence do we need..

Reader comment on item: An Unveiling: Separate, but Acceptable?
in response to reader comment: Are u kidding?

Submitted by donvan (United States), Mar 28, 2007 at 09:44

Should any additional evidence be required to attest to the aggressive and dominating nature of Islam, one need look no closer than this response. The concept is called "Inalienable" rights. This means that we, as Americans cannot be separated from our Right of freedom of speech. You may not tell me what I may or may not say, regarding any subject,anytime any where.

Obviously these concepts are unfamiliar to you, and one can understand ignorance. In America the rights of the individual to speak his mind also applies to you. You have the right to defend what you believe, you have no rights as a "Muslim". You have no right not to be offended, and yes the Muhammedian dogma of spreading his message with the sword is offensive to the human community. The so called "Dome of the rock" decalres "God has no Son" very insulting and offensive to Christians.

To the non Muhammedian, Islam is a dark,dangerous,and deadly, bent on destruction slavery and violence. One need only to look at the pathetic condition Muhammed has led the people to, drowning in their own excrement, and yet you would have me be silent. That is not will of God, that is the will of man. Human beings that believe they speak for God, yet deceive and take their money to destroy the infidels from the people. Al Lah may give you many things. Gold,riches,slaves,many wives,power and people may fear you. But he cannot give you peace. It is thru Jesus Christ the God transformed mankind and introduced the possibility Peace. Put away your sword Muhammed.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to what more evidence do we need.. by donvan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)