Submitted by Zia (United States), Mar 4, 2006 at 23:24
Some people are so ignorant when it comes to the Koran.
The Koran was compiled into a book version after the death of Muhammad by about 20 years. But before that AS IS DONE TODAY, the Koran was committed to memory by many of the companions of the Prophet. When one says "Committed to memory", it means VERBATIM, or word for word. So the issue of a fragmented Koran being compiled full of mistakes is wrong.
To reiterate, the Koran is STILL TODAY memorized verbatim throughout the world.
And as for the claims about Syro-Aramaic or whatever the author claimed, that is completely bogus. The Koran is in 100% Arabic, and has always been. That doesnt mean that there aren't similarities in the languages, there probably are.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.