2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Military Victory was implied

Reader comment on item: Is Israel Victory Still Needed?
in response to reader comment: Best to avoid a military "victory" over Palestine

Submitted by John in Michigan (United States), Oct 13, 2020 at 00:02

Dr. Pipes wrote "[The Israel Victory project] called for Israel to take advantage of its overwhelming economic and military superiority to compel the Palestinians to accept defeat, setting the stage for their eventual acceptance of Israel"

It is entirely reasonable to assume, as commenters 'Mike J.' did, that military victory might be a component of this project, and to urge that victory not be defined entirely or even mostly in military terms.

Having read other articles, it is clear to me that military actions will almost inevitably be a component of Israeli victory, but also, victory does not consist of simply killing Palestinian militants until there are no more. Pipes understands that this would create martyrs, sympathy, and a new generation of militants. The details of how to achieve victory are still a work in progress, and the strategy must remain flexible to respond to setbacks and opportunities as they emerge.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

Military superiority can mean, for example, cutting Gaza off when Hamas or PIJ attack. That is not the same as a military victory.

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Military Victory was implied by John in Michigan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)