1 readers online now  |  69 million page views
You're invited: Join Daniel Pipes & MEF on a fact-finding mission
to Poland, Hungary & Austria. For more information, click here

Excellent article

Reader comment on item: In Defense of Europe's "Far-Right" Parties

Submitted by Anon. (Israel), Nov 2, 2018 at 09:18

I would state that were the Sweden Democrats in favor of viewing all white people as one nation, they would hardly want Sweden to be a sovereign country. I think one is acutely aware that in Europe there are various peoples, ethnic groups/nations, living in their historic lands, rather than one people/nation.

It would be unthinkable for ethnic Swedes to find themselves a minority in Sweden, losing their independence and ability to determine their own fate in their ancestral land, and since they happen to be 'white', were white people to become a minority in Sweden, then people of Swedish descent would be a minority in their own land. There is no reason why they should wish that to happen, just as Arabs in Saudi Arabia can hardly be expected to welcome ever-increasing 'diversity' and to embrace having their Arab/Muslim country turned into a country which is neither Arab nor Muslim and in which they, who are in their ancestral land, would be a minority.

Similarly, Kurds (and when we say Kurds, we always speak of ethnic Kurds) have no wish to be a minority to ethnic Turks, and would hardly wish for mass Turkish immigration into the borders of what used to be Kurdistan. If ethnic Kurds liked being a minority to ethnic turks they would not now be wishing for independence. It isn't that they want 'the land' to be free. It is that they want to be free to determine their destiny and this would not be possible were ethnic Kurds to be a minority to ethnic Turks (or anyone) within the borders of historical Kurdistan.

It is not a matter of "Arab racism" when it comes to Saudi Arabia or of "Kurdish racism" in Kurdistan and it is absurd to regard the white peoples of Europe intense desire to avoid being a minority in their historical lands as racist, it is not based on any racist doctrine or belief whatsoever. Similarly, one would hardly wish upon the Japanese for "asians" to become a minority in Tokyo or in Japan as a whole. This is not a matter of 'asian racism' but of people of Japanese descent not wishing to lose their ability to control their destiny and to avoid having their nation be transformed into a minority community.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Banning circumcision is not antisemitic [62 words]vivarto rotenbergNov 3, 2018 01:32245784
If you are against circumsion, are you also against abortion? [43 words]EdwardNov 6, 2018 17:03245784
This is the radical feminist left obsession with what they term "consent". [418 words]AnonNov 6, 2018 18:14245784
There is nothing "far right" about Sweden Democrats Banning circumcision is not antisemitic [17 words]vivarto rotenbergNov 6, 2018 20:44245784
the point [18 words]vivarto rotenbergNov 6, 2018 23:56245784
Civilization Means Legal Rights [260 words]DaveNov 2, 2018 18:11245778
1Excellent article [382 words]Anon.Nov 2, 2018 09:18245768
Civilisationists Down Under. [182 words]Reynald de ChatillonNov 2, 2018 00:49245765

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Excellent article by Anon.

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)