69 million page views

Hillary Will Veto This Bill

Reader comment on item: No Saudi Money for American Mosques

Submitted by Dave (Canada), Aug 25, 2016 at 16:39

If Hillary Clinton is elected, she will doubtless veto any bill that makes demands of the Saudis. Just consider the hefty contributions from the Gulf States to the Clinton Foundation, her Saudi sidekick Huma Abedin's participation in an Islamist publication peddling anti-American conspiracy theories, her support for the UN "defamation" resolution restricting criticism of Islam, her refusal to relate Islamic ideology in any way to violence and her promise to greatly expand quotas for Muslim migrants.

Hillary Clinton is Angela Merkel on steroids. If she is elected, as seems likely, the US will continue to devolve in its stance towards Islam: less assertive, less honest and more pliant. We will have submission, not reciprocity.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (27) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Singapore to repatriate problematic imam [22 words]PezDispenserApr 3, 2017 11:14238109
First Amendment [231 words]Peter HerzAug 31, 2016 09:48232050
An amazing article [50 words]Sohel BahjatAug 28, 2016 13:42231888
first article basic law of saudi arabia [49 words]RonAug 27, 2016 10:25231824
Hillary Will Veto This Bill [114 words]DaveAug 25, 2016 16:39231741
You betcha that VA Rep gerry connolly will vehemently oppose the bill. [20 words]MarkAug 25, 2016 10:14231737
,,, Mosques being built with Lottery funds [85 words]M.D. AnthonyAug 24, 2016 20:10231723
2Hypocrisy continues [91 words]PrashantAug 26, 2016 05:42231723
1Honors the Spirit of the Establishment Clause [105 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AdamAug 24, 2016 10:44231687
1Funding and regulating religions is strictly a matter of the states, not the Federal Government [139 words]Michael SSep 9, 2016 03:47231687
Expand this legislation [50 words]David KoralAug 24, 2016 09:19231683
Brats's bill needs a great deal of work [270 words]James LuceAug 24, 2016 08:30231682
Question to Daniel [63 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
stevenlAug 24, 2016 02:23231676
Pillars & Fundamentals [388 words]susana moskowitzAug 24, 2016 19:24231676
3Reminds me of the Ground Zero mosque... [67 words]LeslieAug 24, 2016 01:30231673
It's about time [31 words]Timothy HadleyAug 23, 2016 17:51231658
1Thanks for writing this article. [131 words]PrashantAug 25, 2016 01:23231658
Masajid [168 words]Iftikhar AhmadAug 23, 2016 14:36231648
Sharia law is being applied in G.Britain on local basis. [100 words]AlainAug 24, 2016 11:50231648
Why can't American Muslims fund American Mosques [219 words]John in Michigan, USAAug 24, 2016 14:00231648
2Congratulations, reader Iftikhar Ahmad [123 words]PrashantAug 25, 2016 01:12231648
3Dream on Mr Iftikhar Ahmed [50 words]dhimmi no moreAug 26, 2016 08:34231648
1sharia Laws [701 words]Iftikhar AhmadAug 27, 2016 12:00231648
2Advise from our dear Iftikhar about Sharia'a and breast feeding of the adult [40 words]dhimmi no moreAug 30, 2016 12:18231648
who says? [84 words]Mohammed Waza Khiddif id'UllahSep 15, 2016 05:51231648
2Islam is not the fastest growing religion [78 words]dhimmi no moreSep 17, 2016 11:41231648
2Ifthikar Ahmad's sole focus should be democracy in Islamic world [189 words]PrashantNov 28, 2016 14:45231648

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Hillary Will Veto This Bill by Dave

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes