18 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Mahometanism's unity

Reader comment on item: Islamism's Unity in Tunisia

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Oct 31, 2012 at 16:53

That would be a fine article if the highly artificial and politically correct neologism "Islamism" were replaced by "Islam" or the old good English word "Mahometanism". After all the doctrine invented by Buddha is called "Buddhism", by Zoroaster "Zoroastrianism", by Christ "Christianity" or "Christianism", but somehow this common sense and well-established usage has been violated in the case of Mahometans.Why risk their rage and pogroms for calling them what they are - "Mahometans" and reject the insidious self-aggrandizing names they try to impose on us thus imposing their rules of the games? It is Mahomet and his Koran that assure the unity of Mahometanism.

Dr. Pipes wrote :

>The Tunisian tape brings yet another carefully crafted bifurcation of moderate and extremist Islamists crashing down. All Islamists are one. A moderate Islamist is as fantastical a notion as a moderate Nazi. Every member of this barbaric movement is a potential totalitarian thug. Western governments should neither accept nor work with the one or the other.<has eloquently demostrated , since 1945 the Western governments, especially the US, has been supporting,training and financing all forms of radical Mahometanism in its geo-strategic games in Eurasia. They have been involved in supporting and cultivating the most regressive, anti-democratic inhuman Mahometan tyrannies in the region like Saudi Arabia or the Gulf Emirates. The elites of these radically Mahometan countries have simply bought US politicians and thus biased decisions made in the US on many vital issues with fatal consequences as 9/11 showed. The mutual dependencies in politics, finance and business between the Western governments and the Mahometan tyrannies have been so tight and close and obvious up till now that any sincere public discussions on them in the mainstream media are hardly allowed. This is in part due to the fact that both the Democratic and Republican party in the US depend on the same poisoned source of Mahometan money with many strings attached to it and neither is ready to forego it.

And now in view of all of that we shall believe that the same people who have routinely done such things for decades will out of a sudden not accept totalitarian thugs they have been doing such nice business and politics with in Afghanistan, Libya or Syria? They shall decline the generous alms from the Gulf wahhabis and salafi tyrants ? The Western politicians will be good boys from now on ? If miracles happened, then definitely this would be one of the most miraculous of them all !


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Submitting....

Reader comments (30) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
16A point of No Return [151 words]Michael Hanni MorcosNov 13, 2012 22:21200564
7The game of out numbering . [189 words]aktNov 14, 2012 20:34200564
Sir Please do somethig for the syrian christians [59 words]spaNov 12, 2012 03:34200485
What about incitement by Qaradawi? [42 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
stagNov 5, 2012 09:59200348
5It is important to understand the hidden motives of the goal, which is for Islam [100 words]JosephNov 5, 2012 02:44200338
1Unholy alliance [90 words]IanusNov 6, 2012 06:44200338
AIFD [17 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
KerryNov 1, 2012 19:43200232
2A DOUBTFUL ISLAMIST UNITY [158 words]JACQUES HADIDANov 1, 2012 13:13200226
5Mahometanism's unity [416 words]IanusOct 31, 2012 16:53200207
1Absolutely accurate [76 words]DEBORAH THE JUDGENov 2, 2012 09:19200207
3"Muslim" - another politically correct neologism surreptitiously imposed upon us by Mahometans and their apologists [264 words]IanusNov 3, 2012 03:53200207
7"Muslim" - another politically correct neologism surreptitiously imposed upon us by Mahometans and their apologists ( full version?)) [743 words]IanusNov 4, 2012 02:50200207
3Thank you [182 words]DEBORAH THE JUDGENov 9, 2012 10:02200207
1Is it Muslim or Moslem [356 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 12, 2013 17:28200207
Slight correction [37 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 13, 2013 06:39200207
3Islamists unity [205 words]goergeOct 31, 2012 16:50200206
1More Lawful Islamists AND Stupid Terrorists? [240 words]AlexOct 31, 2012 11:25200194
2wake up or be prepared to pay the price [168 words]akktOct 31, 2012 07:26200190
1When wasn't Mahometanism a real threat to non-Mahometans ? [207 words]IanusNov 3, 2012 09:44200190
2When wasn't Mahometanism a real threat to non-Mahometans? (2 missing paragraphs added) [295 words]IanusNov 4, 2012 03:03200190
9The enemy is here and multiplying rapdily [316 words]SusanNov 5, 2012 23:04200190
2Another "umma" is emerging [200 words]PrashantNov 7, 2012 02:07200190
3High time for Non-muslims to unite. [178 words]aktNov 14, 2012 04:26200190
5Creepy and scary Islamists living among us [197 words]dhimmi no moreOct 31, 2012 07:11200189
1Moderate Islamism [99 words]StephenOct 31, 2012 05:53200187
2Islamist [7 words]Steven LOct 30, 2012 21:50200183
The Salafis and Rachid Ghannouchi in Tunis [141 words]Ibrahim Abu BakarOct 30, 2012 20:24200181
4so much for intellectual observations of Islamic concepts [269 words]rodney allsworthOct 30, 2012 20:14200180
1ISLAMISM ' UNITY [134 words]samOct 30, 2012 15:37200175
Huge favor [59 words]LeeOct 30, 2012 11:34200170

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2014 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes