Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Preaching to the Choir
Reader comment on item: Has America Learned from 9/11?

Submitted by Edwin F. Buckley (United States), Nov 6, 2004 at 14:31

For years, we have known of militant Islam's intent. Historically, when the capabilities are there, it has been a religion of military expansionism. That has gone on for hundreds of years.

On September 11, 2001, we lost nearly 3,000 people. All those people began their day just as they would any other. Unfortunately for them and their families, the day did not end just like any other. Nearly 3,000 people died terrible deaths on that day, and who ended up being the victims? The Muslims of America, of course. Groups such as CAIR immediately went into action claiming victimhood. Forgotten were some Muslim men who were out on the streets of Brooklyn celebrating as the towers collapsed. Forgotten were some smiling Muslim men who went to a park, also in Brooklyn, to be photographed with the smoke of the tragedy rising behind them. Victims of what? Were there ever any widespread attacks on the Muslims of this country?!

Things did change after 9/11. Demands from many Muslims in America. Demands for a specially dedicated place to pray in schools, and demands for speaker systems to announce their call to prayers come immediately to mind (Michigan). Demands are being made that would be openly ridiculed by the ACLU and others if any other religious groups were making them. Everything came but what would be expected. That is, where was the widespread condemnation by American Muslims of what took place on 9/11? There are some noble exceptions, but so very few.

We of the western world have a fundamental flaw. For better or worse, we see all religions as fundamentally good. We in America have a western European view. Most of the people who have migrated to North America have accepted that culture and added a little along the way. Islamic nations, unfortunately, look at diversity in a somewhat different way than do the rest of us. Putting it rather bluntly, diversity is unacceptable. Those who fail to merge, well, they pay a rather costly price. Shall we discuss Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt?

It is time, I think, for a goodly number of North Americans (USA and Canada) to wake up and smell the coffee. If you basically like our culture, there is a war to be fought.





Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title By Date
The spread of democracy [46 words]S.C.PandaNov 9, 2004 04:58
⇒ Preaching to the Choir [373 words]Edwin F. BuckleyNov 6, 2004 14:31
"Losing My Religion" [191 words]John PennNov 5, 2004 06:16
The War on Terror and the War on Iraq: two different coins [362 words]Ron PollandNov 4, 2004 15:44
Some will not learn. [68 words]T.B. RobertsNov 3, 2004 19:43
Two Choices/Two Disappointments [50 words]William SturmNov 3, 2004 15:49
The Frightening Immediacy of the Truth [65 words]Kevin MNov 2, 2004 18:12
I side with Helprin's view. [87 words]Darwin BarrettNov 2, 2004 18:10
Helprin is Right On [125 words]Barry MillerNov 2, 2004 17:50
Policy without implementation is nothing [867 words]Michael KraftNov 2, 2004 16:57
Kerry's rejection [60 words]JedNov 2, 2004 12:53
Protecting America [51 words]German MunozNov 2, 2004 11:57
Vote [330 words]Kim SegarNov 2, 2004 11:12
Lindberg vs Helprin [164 words]Vijay DandapaniNov 2, 2004 10:41
Another home run [50 words]SeymaNov 2, 2004 10:26

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page