Syrian connection to Pan Am Bombing#103

Submitted by Sir Daniel M.J.Tobin (United States), Jun 21, 2010 at 19:41

Hello again: I was wondering if you thought there was a Syrian connection in the Libyan/Iranian planning,paying for and bombing on the 8th day of Hannakah, 1988, Lockerbie, Scotland. As you well know from past postings and my meetings with Sec. State Albright, NSadviser Sandy Berger and UN Ambassador Bill Richardson, The US had sanctions against those 3 Islamist dictatorships since the 1980's, and they did not stop terrorism against the West.

I hope that you will all write, fax, e-mail, and phone The White House and Congress to get sanctions back in force against Libya, and get the entire Gaddaffi Family into custody for profiting from their father's War Crimes which is un-Constitutional, and against International Law. The Gaddaffi family foundation is just another front for terrorism, and is comprised of trillions of dinar, Europetrodollars, American Dollars, Shekels and rubles. I am horrified that Mossad and CIA have not been able to take Gaddaffi and his accomplices in to custody to answer for his crimes, and Victims' families and advocates were further insulted and enraged by the Bush-Cheney-Rice regime's failure to take him into custody last year when he was permitted to "speak" at The United Nations in NYCity.

Hopefully you will all boycott and divest from Russian Gazprom, French Total SA, and Venezuelan Citgo, since they do business with anti-American Muslim regimes, and boycott and divest from Exxon-Mobil, Amerada-Hess, and Royal dutch Shell, which are culpable for doing business with Foreign War Criminals of Iran, Libya and Syria, in violation of Federal Law, but I would be naive to believe that they are being enforced as well as they can be. ...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".