BBC v/s USA.
Reader comment on item: Islamic Hotels, Forwarding Islamic Law
in response to reader comment: Only PC Approved Religions acceptable.

Submitted by gordon weare (New Zealand), Mar 20, 2008 at 20:05

The British Broadcasting Coporatioin, BBC, has long had it in for America. (Basically it can't cope with ordinary people being richer than them, that English class sickness, even worse, they dont have Etonian accents).

Part of contemporary BBC strategy today is to portray 'Protestants' as being exclusively a Product of America. The 'Free Churches' are not acceptable on the list of PC-Approved religions/denominations. (Only the worlds major religions are IN, this is the most dangerous global-religious situation ever in human history).

The BBC, freely enters USA (and Israel), visits small, and unusual churches or religious groups (not PC-Acceptable of course), in its perpetual attempt to illustrate that the PC-Dissaproved religions/denominations are a sick product of USA only. Fortress Britain, has for centuries fought off fanatical religious invaders, and has won with flying colours, WW2 was the last to date, but aside from the military victories, in principle Britain LOST, where America won, why America grew, and UK sank.

A recent BBC program, one of several, saw Mr.Theroux visit religious groups, San Quentin etc - all in that BBC 'superiority attitude' to portray the United States as the font of religious bizarreness - But Britain & her BBC has no guts whatsoever, in confronting the sickening blackmails of deadly islam on her own green and unpleasant land. T'is why I emigrated, I did the right thing. For normal people to live in todays Britain is a nightmare. Even if similar existed in USA - at least in USA you can do something about it. BBC Televisions heroes today are:- the effeminate, the sissy, the coward, the criminal, the dysfunctional and the incorrigible.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.