Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Mar 11, 2008 at 14:58
Today, ACT on basing its report on The WorldNet Daily PR, emphasized again the Blindness of the FBI.
The FBI seeks diversity, BUT they do not hire Christians and Jews fluent in Arabic.
The FBI seeks diversity, which includes members and supporters of Islamo Fascists Terrorists of ISNA the M Brotherhood and ADAM.
The FBI seeks diversity, but this kind of diversity puts in priority from the Top to almost Bottom down MUSLIMS, so it is NOT anymore, statistically speaking, diversity.
The FBI looks forward to not understanding what diversity means.
This is definitely a bad joke. Who is in control of the FBI? Maybe: CAIR.
Let's just stop and find a way to take an efficient attitude.
Write to your representative.
Ynnatchkah
********************************************************
From ACT:
"…The WorldNet Daily story below illustrates why we regularly point out how "political correctness" is aiding and abetting the advance of militant Islam in America. One line is especially revealing: "The [FBI] officials said terrorism is "not a new phenomenon" limited to Muslims, and they cited abortion-clinic bomber Eric Rudolph as an example of a Christian terrorist." The problem with this reasoning is that very few terrorist acts worldwide are perpetrated by Christians, whereas since 9/11 over 9,000 verifiable acts of terrorism have been perpetrated worldwide by Muslims. Furthermore, nowhere in the New Testament are Christians exhorted to "smite infidels" or forcibly subjugate unbelievers, as is the case in the Qur'an and the Hadith. To gloss over or rationalize Islamic terrorism by pointing to a handful of "Christian terrorists" is a revealing example of political correctness run amok in the FBI, a political correctness that some field agents tell us they vehemently disagree with. You will be stunned by what you read in this story."…
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=58258
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
