69 million page views

Assimilation

Reader comment on item: Lodi's Pakistani Community

Submitted by Rubicon (United States), Dec 17, 2007 at 14:18

Without a doubt it is wrong to persecute people due to their faith, their method of dressing, their country of origin, or nationality, or their skin color, etc. America is supposed to be about inclusion.

That said, I also find it inappropriate for people to come to America, become citizens, etc. and not be able to speak the nations predominant language. Whether they stay mainly in their own community or not, this is America and their is a national language, whether its official or not. To not learn the language means someone is saying all I want to do is take, and not to give or participate.

Its easy to exclude people if they keep only to themselves. Its easy to ostracize people if they cannot converse with people in their community. That does not happen because Americans want it that way or do it deliberately. It happens just because if you stay away from people, they will naturally return the favor.

Additionally, these folks cannot have assimilated into America in almost any sense if they shun or watch any of their community who may have "snitched" and revealed the identity of a potential terrorist. Why would they object to the capture or imprisonment of a suspected or known terrorist? Why is protecting a Pakistani more important than protecting a fellow American citizen who may be murdered by a terrorist? If you come, accpet citizenship & all the priveledges that go with that, you also accept the responsibilities that go with that.

If you do not join in, you will always be seen as strange and people will always suspect you are up to no good. You cannot assimilate & enjoy all of America if you refuse to become an American. If you do not want to become an American, then why are you here & becoming an official citizen? Additionally,

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (6) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
To assimilate or not to assimilate? [380 words]Rebecca MouldsDec 18, 2007 14:06116468
3Assimilation is natural. Non-assimilation is deliberate [192 words]PrashantMay 3, 2014 13:19116468
Confidence in culture [37 words]David W. LincolnDec 17, 2007 23:24116415
Assimilation [311 words]RubiconDec 17, 2007 14:18116356
Non-assimilation in general. [121 words]Charles GriffithDec 17, 2007 11:06116343
Toughen Up [120 words]Arif Jayish Al JerzyDec 17, 2007 18:51116343

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Assimilation by Rubicon

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)