69 million page views

Flynt Analysis on the issue and disconnection in reality.

Reader comment on item: Riyadh Reorients to Moscow

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Dec 2, 2007 at 02:45

1. First time I know about the intention of the US to deep relations to a country that in my understanding will consider all Bargain in action Uni-Lateral, no matter what package they agree in advance, having the Baksheesh culture in mind as a motto.

2. And, the US wants Iran cooperation for improvements in Iraq? How sick is that.

3.A dual cooperation in between the two would require America's acceptance of the Islamic Republic and recognition of a legitimate Iranian role in the region, but Iran is a terrorist state- is that the reason why Washington supported Israel humiliation in Annapolis? This type of sick relation as normal?

4. And. how schizophrenic as Gerald Posner several times stated, is the relation in between KSA and America?

The KSA is rather praised and unconditionally protected by America, in the sense I'm aware of than showing animosity.

5. As Flynt says:

"...changes in Iranian behavior and policies"...

The problem is not the Iranian regime but the Iranian Motto which does not change.

"..Assuming that U.S. concerns about Iranian pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and opposition to a negotiated settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict were addressed satisfactorily and that Tehran terminated its provision of military equipment and training to terrorist organizations, the United States would commit to ending unilateral sanctions against the Islamic Republic imposed by executive orders, reestablishing diplomatic relations and reaching a settlement of other bilateral claims"...

Iran already stated their will of destroying Israel forever so this type of thing will never make Iran and the US have a bargaining relation.... read the following article- I liked it a lot.

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/Flynt%20Leverett%20testimonyNovember07.htm

I loved Flynt's approach but I find it surrealistic given also that the timeframe for this improvement is much larger than what the US has now- so is KSA allying with Russia b/c they know Russia anymosity and resentments against America- as way of blackmailing America?

The KSA is not friendly to Iran, unless when to destroy Israel and wants to pressure the US not to support Iran in any way?

Deplorable.

More money to the Russian Mafia.....

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Next Comment >>

Reader comments (10) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Good riddance [114 words]VijayDec 9, 2007 11:25115960
Actually it clears things up [90 words]David W. LincolnDec 7, 2007 11:33115883
Wishful Thinking [87 words]sbalogDec 7, 2007 10:26115877
Re: Whistling Past Graveyards [84 words]NealDec 7, 2007 09:19115872
With Brazil Too. [135 words]YnnatchkahDec 5, 2007 14:17115771
Are the Saudis BUYING arms from Russia because Bush wants to GIVE THEM $20 billion in arms? [278 words]DrRJPDec 5, 2007 10:42115762
Ends covering the middle [38 words]Brian HDec 4, 2007 11:59115704
Biggest Geo-Strategic Blunder Ever, but I Guess Dr. Pipes is Right to be Optimistic [163 words]AlexDec 3, 2007 15:14115648
Saudis just playing us off against Russia, Iran irrelevant [156 words]Charles MartelDec 3, 2007 13:46115639
Flynt Analysis on the issue and disconnection in reality. [351 words]YnnatchkahDec 2, 2007 02:45115565

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Flynt Analysis on the issue and disconnection in reality. by Ynnatchkah

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)