37 readers online now

99,258 comments by 26,347 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Islam, Radical Islam and Islamism - Semantics
Reader comment on item: No Pipe Dream

Submitted by Singha (India), Oct 20, 2007 at 23:09

I have pointed this out elsewhere as well. Radical Islam or Islamism is nothing but Islam in action.

Intellectuals like Dr. Pipes perhaps believe that a useful purpose is served by the distinction between Islam (dealing with God religion) and Islamism (dealing with politics).

Unfortunately Islam in its formative years saw religion and politics are headed by the same person. Mohummad set a very wrong precedent mixing up politics and religion. Islam's Islamism problem lie at its core. While it might be possible to separate Jesus from evangelical christianism, it is impossible to separate mohummad from Islamism. Islam and Islamism remain siamese twins with the same heart.

No useful purpose is served by the distinction unless, one want to position Islamism along with other failed isms, Communism, Nazism, Fasism and therefore damn Islam itself. While this semantic approach gives people including muslims the opening to attack islam, it also obfuscates and in a way makes islam look nice suggesting as if islamism is something different and is the sole problem.

I personally believe that we all should call spade a spade. The costs of obfuscation and and refusal to see see reality has always been calamitous.

God bless the Jews and make their fight against Islamism a success. I also wish that Jews select the right partners in this fight, people who have conviction such as Hindu groups that have been and continue to be victims of Islamism.

Singha


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title By Date
MURDERERS OF THE PROPHETS? [139 words]JON PURIZHANSKYOct 31, 2007 02:57
Some people do realize [81 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDOct 27, 2007 16:03
If Israel falls, the blame goes to . . . [57 words]Phil GreendOct 24, 2007 17:21
History is repeating itself [1391 words]Johnny S.Oct 23, 2007 17:52
Psalm 2 - a Collective Thought About the History of Israel [337 words]M. ToveyOct 23, 2007 23:40
Fighting the islamic scourge [72 words]G.VishvasOct 23, 2007 15:06
It is of no use to deal with the Arab-Israeli conflict [114 words]Alain Jean-MairetOct 23, 2007 13:21
We win, they lose [125 words]David W. LincolnOct 22, 2007 22:06
when cons outweigh pros [272 words]jennifer solisOct 22, 2007 18:57
The History of Israel is Written by the Hand of Almighty God - Not the Debates of Men [713 words]M. ToveyOct 22, 2007 15:59
What of hindus?
[w/response] [63 words]
G.VishvasOct 22, 2007 14:46
2 Key differences between Hamas and PLO [366 words]Charles MartelOct 22, 2007 13:47
Totalitarian faith [133 words]infidelOct 22, 2007 02:55
PANDEMIC.. [138 words]donvanOct 24, 2007 10:06
Red Flag [147 words]YnnatchkahOct 21, 2007 11:29
Come ... let us reason together. [245 words]Susan BrowneOct 21, 2007 06:50
⇒ Islam, Radical Islam and Islamism - Semantics [239 words]SinghaOct 20, 2007 23:09
I think Daniel is too smart to believe in the distinction... [107 words]Charles MartelOct 22, 2007 13:06

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.