The 9/11 Families' Case Against the Saudi Princes – and Me

The U.S. Supreme Court today declined to hear an appeal on a lawsuit brought by the families of 9/11 victims against Saudi princes whom they accused of helping the terrorists, thereby ending a legal process some seven years in duration. (In contrast, the case against several hundred Saudi commercial banks accused of laundering money for Al-Qaeda continues for they, unlike the princes, cannot hide behind the skirts of "sovereign immunity.")

Allan Gerson.

The origins of the case go back to Jan. 29, 2002, when Allan Gerson, counsel to Jeane Kirkpatrick at the United Nations and the lead lawyer for the Lockerbie families suing Libya, met me for coffee in Washington. I told him my thoughts about the money trail going back to the Saudi government and how it should be held accountable for the atrocity – ideas I presented publicly a few days later at "Sue the Saudis."

Gerson thought I had a good point and he followed up on Feb. 28, 2002 with a confidential memo, "Deterrence Through Accountability," where he wrote that 9/11

presents the central challenge for dealing with international terrorism. A key weapon in this war is the potential use of civil suits against those who helped finance and thus enabled the operation. It would have demonstrated that financial contributions to the Taliban regime was equivalent to contributions to OBL [Osama bin Laden], whose murderous ambitions were clear. Under American and universal principles of tort law, those whose conduct resulted in wrongful death bear responsibility for the consequences. This is also true for donations to charities that could have reasonably been expected to make their way to agents of OBL.

Being connected in the right legal circles, Gerson took the case to the powerhouse lawfirm of Motley Rice, which quickly accepted the case and (with help from other law firms, including Cozen O'Connor, which directly sued the Saudi government) went after the Saudi princes, an effort that culminated in an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Comments: (1) I kept quiet about my role in this law suit, waiting for it to reach a final conclusion, as it did today.

(2) I commend Motley Rice and its partners in pursuing this litigation, I regret that the Obama administration sided with the Saudi princes, and I am proud of having played a small but key role in what came reasonably close to being a landmark decision with vast policy implications. (June 30 2009)

Related Topics:  Daniel Pipes autobiographical, Saudi Arabia, War on terror receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list