Downing Street's Favorite – The Muslim Council of Britain
by Daniel Pipes
"I welcome the statement put out by the Muslim Council." Not only did the Queen of England recently knight Iqbal Sacranie of the Muslim Council of Britain, but Prime Minister Tony Blair today, in his first major speech following the four explosions in London, gave the MCB this very high-visibility praise. What did the MCB say to deserve this extraordinary endorsement from the head of government? Its full statement can be found at the Muslim Council of Britain website, but I proffer an abridged version:
July 14, 2005 update: With the rarest of exceptions, the MCB has for years enjoyed a free pass in the media. In a stunning change, BBC Radio 4's Today programme interviewed John Ware, a critic of the organization, and then put tough questions to MCB spokesman Inayat Bunglawala. Interestingly, the main topic of the interviews was the MCB's positive attitude toward suicide bombing in Israel.
July 16, 2005 update: The MCB convened yesterday a special meeting of imams and ulama at the Islamic Cultural Centre in Regents Park, London, and they endorsed a declaration. It contains the usual boilerplate ("deeply shocked and saddened … utterly criminal, totally reprehensible, and absolutely un-Islamic … heartfelt sorrow") but, that out of the way, it gets down to business:
Summarized, the good imams and ulama are announcing that Muslims in Great Britain (first paragraph) and around the world (second paragraph) are victims and that the implication of 7/7 is that they should be treated better. What a travesty. Worse is that barely anyone in the UK is willing to point this out.
July 19, 2005 update: The Blair government's fawning attachment to the MCB has spurred one good thing, MCB Watch, "an occasional blog, monitoring and commenting on the output of the Muslim Council of Britain. Although the MCB claim to be the voice of moderate Islam in the UK, there are many problems with this and it is our thesis that their moderate credentials are severely questionable." Just what the doctor ordered.
Aug. 6, 2005 update: Beila Rabinowitz of MilitantIslamMonitor.org points out some other interesting facts about the MCB.
Aug. 7, 2005 update:: Salman Rushdie also remembers Sacranie's statement and argues in the Washington Post today against seeing Sacranie as a moderate. "Tony Blair's decision to knight him and treat him as the acceptable face of "moderate," "traditional" Islam is either a sign of his government's penchant for religious appeasement or a demonstration of how limited Blair's options really are."
Aug. 14, 2005 update: Hold on to your chair before you start reading this update, otherwise you might keel over.
The Observer, Sunday version of the Guardian, Great Britain's left-most quality newspaper, has published two critical articles by Martin Bright today on the MCB. "Muslim leaders in feud with the BBC" reports of its nasty row with the BBC; "Radical links of UK's 'moderate' Muslim group" is the Observer's own investigation into the MCB.
The first article was prompted by what the Observer calls "an extraordinary letter," dated August 11, from the Muslim Council of Britain to the BBC's director general Mark Thompson, and posted on the MCB website. In it, the MCB claims that the BBC's "Panorama" program has a "pro-Israel agenda" (now, that's a new thought!) and raises strenuous objections to a feature coming up soon looking at Muslim organizations in Britain, where it sees the Panorama team seemingly intent "on creating mistrust by serving the interests of the pro-Israel lobby and undermining community relations in the UK." The Observer adds that the feature is expected to be "highly critical" of some MCB affiliates for their links to extremist Islamic ideology. The reporter of this segment, John Ware already tipped his hand in a BBC interview last month (see the June 14, 2005 update, above).
A BBC spokeswoman officially responded: "The BBC rejects completely any allegation of institutional or programme bias and is confident the Panorama programme will be fair and impartial." Unofficially, a senior BBC source called the MCB accusation "plain wrong," "insulting," and "frankly preposterous."
As Bright points out, the BBC is hardly known for its pro-Israel orientation. For one, the head of the Israeli government's press office, Danny Seaman, accused it in July 2003, of "demonising and vilifying" the State of Israel.
The second article consists of a look at some of the individuals (Iqbal Sacranie, Inayat Bunglawala, Khurshid Ahmad) and some of the over 400 organizations (Islamic Foundation, Jamiat Ahl-i-Hadith) making up the MCB, showing their intimate links to Pakistan's leading Islamist, Abul A'la Al-Mawdudi, and his Jamaat-i-Islami party. It notes that the MCB originated in the Islamist opposition to The Satanic Verses in 1988 and it came into formal existence in November 1997 . From the first, it has had a close relationship with the Blair government, especially the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its little-known outreach department to British Muslims. The FCO pamphlet Muslims in Britain, writes Bright, "is essentially an MCB publication and the official ministerial celebration of the Muslim festival of Eid is organised jointly with the MCB." The MCB "used its influence in Whitehall" to make sure that the Festival of Muslim Cultures, planned for 2006, funded by the British Council, with Prince Charles as its patron, will be compliant with the Shari'a.
The second article concludes that the MCB's "claims to represent a moderate or progressive tendency in Islam are becoming increasingly difficult to sustain. … far from being moderate, the Muslim Council of Britain has its origins in the extreme orthodox politics in Pakistan. And as its influence increases through Whitehall, many within the Muslim community are growing concerned that this self-appointed organisation is crowding out other, genuinely moderate, voices of Muslim Britain."
Comments: (1) This is precisely the sort of investigation that no mainstream media in the United States has ever done for CAIR, MPAC, ISNA, MAS, or the other local Islamist institutions, even after 9/11. Will it take domestic Muslims killing dozens to precipitate dozens for that to happen? I suspect so – another case of education by murder.
(2) In the meantime, the best Americans can muster was a tepid but informative article yesterday on CAIR in a small-town newspaper.
Aug. 21, 2005 update (1): Alasdair Palmer in the Sunday Telegraph takes the MCB critique a step further at "Top job fighting extremism for Muslim who praised bomber," looking at what Inayat Bunglawala, the organization's media secretary, has been saying over the years. I provide a few of his details in the "Londonistan Follies" entry, under this date.
Aug. 21, 2005 update (2): The BBC showed "A question of Leadership" this evening; it also provided a transcript and some other features. The show does not disappoint; John Ware interviewed the right people, asked the right questions, displayed a suitable persistence, and it made crystal clear that the MCB is an Islamist institution. Now, will the British establishment draw the obvious conclusion, exclude it, and seek a moderate replacement?
Aug. 28, 2005 update: In a sharp critique, "A Muslim at bay," appearing in (of all places) the Observer, Andrew Anthony dismantles the MCB brick by brick:
Anthony then discusses the BBC show:
May 10, 2006 update: Perhaps one reason that the Blair government coddles the MCB is that it helps pay for it. According to materials released through a Freedom of Information Act request (and released by the FOIA Centre under the title "Home office funds muslim council of Britain"), letters exchanged in February 2005 between the Home Office and the MDB reveal the government gave it a grant of at least £148,160 for the year ending March 2006.
This was less than a third of the £500,000 the MCB had requested in January 2005 to fund a proposal titled, "British Muslims: From Alienation to Engagement." The proposal included the following passages:
The government grant was announced by the Cohesion and Faiths Unit in a letter to Akber Mohamedali, the MCB's treasurer. The money funded five projects proposed by the MCB:
The Home Office imposed several terms and conditions for the grant:
The Home Office-MCB correspondence also shows that, after the £148,160 grant was made, the MCB sought further funding. An e-mail from Mohamedali to the Home Office in August 2005 asks for £35,000, which includes £9,300 for an "incident monitoring service" and £5,000 for the MCB's revamped website to be "technically tested and go live on the web."
Comments: (1) One can hardly be surprised at this late date that the British taxpayer is subsidizing an Islamist organization, but one can still be outraged. (2) Government funding for the MCB proposal implicitly endorses the MCB's contention that Muslim has been fuelled "by a backlash of increased levels of Islamophobia in all sections of society, the over-zealous use by law enforcement agencies of new draconian anti-terrorism provisions … and Britain's role in the 'war on terrorism' in Muslim countries." (3) Note the Home Office condition that some of the MCB's work "may need to be on a strictly confidential basis"; one cannot help but wonder what that might involve.
Muhammad Abdul Bari
Muhammad Abdul Bari
July 12, 2006 update: "This pamphlet is dedicated to a Foreign Office whistleblower whose courageous actions have allowed me to expose Whitehall's love affair with Islamism." Thus reads the dedication of Martin Bright's pamphlet, published by the London think tank, Policy Exchange, When Progressives Treat with Reactionaries: The British State's flirtation with radical Islamism. Using leaked documents, Bright exposes how, Tony Blair's focus on radical Islam notwithstanding, his government continues to deal with Islamists as both legitimate and the representatives of British Islam.
Dec. 1, 2006 update: John Ware documents how the British government has dropped its "special relationship" with the Muslim Council of Britain in "MCB in the dock."
Jan. 31, 2007 update: David Cameron, the Conservative leader, has endorsed a serious new party report, Uniting the Country, that blasts the MCB for allowing "hardline members ... to dominate policy and crowd out more moderate voices." The Tory leader said the government must not bow to the "loudest voices" in the Muslim community. Muhammad Abdul Bari, the MCB secretary-general, responded by saying Cameron has surrounded himself with "rabid" and "ill-informed" advisers. Comment: Should the Tories win the next election, the MCB could well find itself excluded from 10 Downing Street, just as CAIR is from the White House.
Feb. 10, 2007 update: Shahid Malik, Labour MP for Dewsbury, "sends a message to the Muslim Council of Britain" in an article today, "Stop whingeing and show leadership." In it, he criticizes the MCB's "flawed moral leadership" and compares it to Nick Griffin, the British Nationial Party leader.
Mar. 23, 2009 update: The MCB has gone from problem to problem over the past two years, culminating now in a suspension of ties by the government with the organization, on account of its deputy secretary-general, Daud Abdullah, signing a declaration in February calling for violence against Israel and condoning attacks on British troops.
Mar. 30, 2009 update: The MCB's fall continues. News from today's Times (London) story, "Government moves to isolate Muslim Council of Britain with cash for mosques."
Reader comments (10) on this item
Comment on this item
You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes