Failing to Find Moderate Muslims at the "Progressive Muslim Union"
by Daniel Pipes
The good news is that my formulation that "militant Islam is the problem, moderate Islam is the solution" is finding wider and wider acceptance. The bad news is the massive confusion over who is a moderate.
Illustrative of this problem are gullible pieces by Rachel Zoll and Carol Eisenberg, both of the Associated Press, as well as a gushing Toronto Star article, all celebrating a supposedly moderate website, www.MuslimWakeUp.com, and the new organization it is sponsoring, the Progressive Muslim Union of North America. Eisenberg's first paragraph sets the tone:
Her article goes on to indicate that some of the worst Islamist and leftist extremists in the United States will have important roles in the organization. Names that stand out are those of Salam Al-Marayati of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, his former colleague Sarah Eltantawi, and Hussein Ibish, previously at the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
Comments: (1) If these are the progressives, who are the regressives? (2) Separating the true moderates from the fakes is the monumental task ahead. (October 20, 2004)
Nov. 15, 2004 update: Today is the official launch of the Progressive Muslim Union. The press release marking this event makes the right noises:
But the real agenda seeps through the sweet talk:
Al-Marayati, Eltantawi, and Ibish have long pretended not to see the difference between those (like Falwell and Robertson) against Islam the religion and those (like me) against radical Islam the totalitarian ideology, no matter how many times I make this distinction. The misrepresentation of my position is further proof that PMU is just another group apologizing for extremism, even if a bit more elegantly wrapped than the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim Public Affairs Council can manage.
It bears remembering that at first, CAIR and MPAC were also seen as moderates; and just as it has taken years for their true colors to be discerned, so will it take time for PMU's real nature to be perceived. But it will be.
Nov. 16, 2004 update: In his column on New York City, the Times' Clyde Haberman repeats the Associated Press' mistake, though he does at least inject a note of skepticism:
Also today, as though wanting to substantiate my point about PMU being made up of assorted extremists, it came out with a statement that deems the U.S.-led attack on Falluja a "war crime."
Nov. 19, 2004 update: The PMU posted its advisory board today and it's a mixed group. Some of its more offensive names include the boorish and fanatical Ali Abunimah, the obscure fake-moderate Ziad Asali, and the famous fake-moderate Tariq Ramadan.
Nov. 25, 2004 update: The fur is flying. At altislam.com, one devoté of CAIR calls the PMU "a bunch of self-declared leftist fanatics who have no idea what Islam is," and others have equally choice words for the new organization.
Nov. 29, 2004 update: Writing in the Jerusalem Report, Jennifer Friedlin falls hook, line, and sinker for the PMU spiel about being part of "a new wave of Islamic reform" that is "open, tolerant, [and] self-critical." She does so even though the quotes she garnered show the organization's true nature. Here is Omid Safi, one of PMU's four co-founders: "Earlier Islamic [reformist] movements were almost uncritically adoring of anything Western," referring to such Muslim thinkers as Indian poet Muhammad Iqbal and Pakistani scholar Fazlur Rahman. "People no longer take the collective experience of the West as a paradigm to be aped."
Dec. 14, 2004 update: In an article asking the question of the hour, "Who is a moderate or progressive Muslim?" Abdus Sattar Ghazali (himself an Islamist) takes a look at the PMU and gives some more evidence about its narrow, reactionary quality. He tells of its
Feb. 7, 2005 update: More evidence of PMU's Islamist nature comes today, at a Los Angeles event, "And Then They Came For Me," co-sponsored by (among others), CAIR, MPAC, and PMU. This Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace rally is billed as a response "to the violation of the civil rights of Muslims."
March 18, 2005 update: Living up to its reputation for being more hip than the other Islamist organizations, the PMU sponsored a woman in hijab, Amina Wadud, lead an Islamic prayer service at a New York City church today. The event was widely panned. Two comments quoted by the Associated Press especially caught my attention:
The Chicago Tribune provides an even more outraged response from this Nussrah:
The Associated Press goes on with another quote:
Haddad is wrong; American Islam is the vanguard of change and Arab Muslims in the Middle East will soon understand that they cannot ignore what is happening, even in a church in New York.
March 21, 2005 update: Another PMU-CAIR link turns up in this statement by Muqtedar Khan:
May 13, 2005 update: Yet another sign of PMU's close connection to CAIR: The Washington Times today ran a profile of Kamal Nawash, head of Free Muslims Against Terrorism and organizer of tomorrow's "March Against Terror." Gathering opinions of Nawash and the march, reporter Jon Ward asked CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper for an opinion but Hooper "referred questions about Mr. Nawash to Hussein Ibish of the Progressive Muslim Union." Likewise, Andrew J. Baroch of VOA News writes that, "While he declined comment on the rally, Mr. Hooper endorsed statements issued by another group called the Progressive Muslim Union of North America."
Comment: They – CAIR and PMU, Hooper and Ibish – must really be tight, as I have never before noted the ever-voluble Hooper let someone else speak for him.
May 20, 2005 update: Salam Al-Marayati today, at a conference at the University of California at Los Angeles, complained that, "In Washington the moderate Muslim is the one who comes to tell you what you want to hear," an interesting point worthy of reflection. He then gave his five criteria for a moderate Muslim:
To assess these criteria, compare them with the ones I set out at "Do you believe in modernity?"
June 5, 2005 update: This afternoon, Khaled Abou El Fadl, whom I have dubbed the "stealth Islamist" delivers the keynote speech at a PMU event on women-led prayer, followed by a discussion moderated by Sarah Eltantawi and including Hussein Ibish.
July 1, 2005 update: Muqtedar Khan has resigned from PMU's advisory board with a scathing public letter. He denounces this "progressive" organization for its "extremely oppressive, abusive and hateful" environment, its "empty claims of openness and tolerance for different perspectives," and its "set of moral principles randomly acquired from Marxism and/or postmodern cultural trends."
Hmm. What happened to the "group of hip, young New Yorkers" who formed PMU to meet "the urgent need for greater and more coordinated articulation of the pluralistic and compassionate sentiments"?
Zuriani "Ani' Zonneveld, PMU executive director
Zuriani "Ani' Zonneveld, PMU executive director
Oct. 10, 2005 update: Omid Safi makes known today that he, along with "most of the Board of Directors, resigned from PMUNA in Summer 2005," then gives his thoughts on the collapse of PMU and concludes by noting ruefully that "some Muslim-haters such as Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer will interpret this as the imploding of the progressive movement." Well, no, Safi, you have it wrong as usual; Spencer and I are not Muslim-haters but Islamist-haters. And we do not see PMU's demise as affecting the "progressive" movement. Rather, it marks the demise of the "Islamists who pretend to be progressive" movement.
Sep. 7, 2006 update: The PMU might seem defunct, but in a long interview on August 24 and today, its executive director, the Malaysian singer Zuriani "Ani' Zonneveld, 43, who lives most of the year in Los Angeles, speaks lyrically of its past and future.
Reader comments (2) on this item
Comment on this item
You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes