United States of America vs. Abdurahman Muhammad Alamoudi
by Daniel Pipes
A U.S. district court made public today the "affidavit in support of criminal complaint" concerning Abdurahman Alamoudi, the Islamist political leader most closely associated with the American Muslim Council. The nearly eight-thousand word document contains many fascinating details that the media will likely not get around to reporting. A few items:
Having now glimpsed the inner workings of Alamoudi's small empire of institutions makes this observer wonder the more intensely what might be going on at the other Islamist organizations. It may not be too long before we have a chance to find out. (September 29, 2003)
Abdurahman Alamoudi in better times, with U.S. president Clinton and vice president Gore.
Abdurahman Alamoudi in better times, with U.S. president Clinton and vice president Gore.
Oct. 29, 2003 update: The government also found an unsigned document in Arabic during a search of al-Amoudi's office in Virginia, reports the Associated Press today. It makes many references to Hamas and discusses "execution of operations against the Israelis to delay the peace process."
Mar. 25, 2004 update: Look up "Fairfax Home Sales" in today's Washington Post and find this unexpected transaction in the Alexandria area:
NANCY HANKS CT., 6325 - Yusef A. Khatib to Abdurahman M. Alamoudi, $380,000.
There could, of course, be other Abdurahman M. Alamoudis than the one who is the subject of this weblog entry, but the chances are pretty good that this purchaser is the man who's been in prison the past half year. And supposing it is, one can't help but wonder what he is doing buying a house for $380,000 even as he languishes in the Big House.
Mar. 30, 2004 update: Federal authorities have nearly doubled the charges against Alamoudi, from 18 to 34, reports the Associated Press, meaning he could be sentenced to as many as 105 years in jail.
Apr. 23, 2004 update: The Muslim American Society today posted a flyer for its May 15 "Freedom Awards and Fundraising Dinner," and who should be the recipient of its "Special Community Service Award" for 2004? Why, none other than Abdurahman Alamoudi – showing once again that militant Islamic organizations are unabashed about supporting accused criminals. (Another prominent case was that of Jamil Al-Amin.)
June 10, 2004 update: There is so much taking place that I wrote an article on this topic, "Qaddafi's American Hit Man?" In addition, here is some important information from a Wall Street Journal story by Glenn R. Simpson, "U.S. Investigates Suspected Plot to Kill Saudi Ruler."
The Justice Department has revealed several facts in court filings: (1) it possesses a handwritten document in Arabic from Alamoudi's office in Falls Church, Va. that contains extensive references to the operations of Hamas; (2) Alamoudi controlled "Happy Hearts Trust," an Isle of Man-registered entity suspected of being one of the Herndon-SAAR organizations that (with a name like that, wouldn't you know?) funded terrorism; (3) Alamoudi's five brothers in Saudi Arabia sent him over $500,000 in recent years; (4) the American Muslim Council received an interest-free loan in 2002 from the Saudi Economic Development Corp., which is controlled by a branch of the Mahfouz family, a prominent Saudi banking clan..
Then there are these intra-Islamist complexities, sketched out by Simpson:
Finally, Simpson writes that Alamoudi "is negotiating an agreement with prosecutors under which he would exchange what he knows for a shorter prison sentence," so we eventually could have all this information and more out and officially on the record.
June 11, 2004 update: IslamOnline.net carries Alamoudi's response to the New York Times article, acknowledging Qaddafi's intention to murder Abdullah but denying his own part in the plot. In response to a question carried by an advisor, Ashraf Nubani, he said that Qaddafi "wanted to kill the Saudi crown prince." Nubani added that "Amoudi does not want to kill anyone."
And Jihad al-Khazen, former editor of a London-based Saudi-owned newspaper, Al-Hayat, claims that he'd known of the plot for half a year:
Of no less interest, the State Department spokesman, Richard Boucher, said today the U.S. government had heard reports in late 2003 that
Boucher goes on to note that this subject was raised "a number of times by U.S. diplomats in meetings with Libyan officials" in late 2003, starting at one of the U.S.-U.K.-Libyan meetings in London. In early 2004, assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs William Burns brought up the issue of "using violence for political ends" directly met with Qaddafi "and again, received the assurances."
June 18, 2004 update: For a Saudi take on this imbroglio, see today's coverage in Al-Yaqeen.
July 6, 2004 update: A front-page story in the Washington Post about Saad Faqih, the London-based Saudi Al-Qaeda sympathizer accused of serving as the intermediary between Alamoudi and the hit men, produces some new details: Saudi officials
July 12, 2004 update: CNSNews.com reports today that Alamoudi has links to Osama bin Laden. The information comes in the middle of a story about the United Association for Studies and Research (on whose director, Ahmed Yousef, I have written about here):
Comment: As the Alamoudi saga unfolds, the full extent of his far-ranging links is coming to light.
July 30, 2004 update: "Mr. Alamoudi plans to plead guilty on Friday to three charges related to illegal business dealings with Libya, failure to disclose past international contacts when he became a naturalized citizen and a tax-related offense," reports the New York Times. His lawyer, Stanley Cohen, assures that "Abdurahman acknowledges that he was involved in a situation that was very harmful to Saudi interests, and he is extraordinarily contrite and ashamed about it, and he's conflicted and confused as to how this all came to pass." Well, he'll have plenty of time in the Big House to figure that one out.
Aug. 3, 2004 update: A weblog not being enough to cover the extraordinary Alamoudi case, I have for the second time written an article on this topic, "Slick Islamist Heads to Jail." (On the first, see the reference above, at the June 10, 2004 update.) In it, I consider this leading Islamist's fall from grace and its implications for the many government agencies which worked with him.
Oct. 15, 2004 update: Alamoudi was sentenced to the maximum 23 years in prison by U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton. "Your honor, I regret my involvement in everything," Alamoudi told the judge before the sentencing. Prosecutor Steven Ward was not convinced, responding to the long sentence by observing "This conduct is so base, so reprehensible that this defendant deserves every day of prison that this court will impose upon him." Amen, say I. But Andrew McCarthy, a former prosecutor, is skeptical that Alamoudi will serve that whole length of time:
Alamoudi will be serving time at U.S. Penitentiary McCreary in McCreary, Kentucky.
Jan. 7, 2005 update: Putting a coda on this whole sordid business, a British court today impounded the $340,000 seized from Alamoudi back in August 2003. The UK authorities indicated this amounted to the single largest seizure in their country of cash for terrorism.
Mar. 12, 2005 update: Saudi sources cited by Craig Whitlock in the Washington Post today provide more information about the Libyan plot to assassinate Crown Prince Abdullah in which Alamoudi took part. Specifically, they conclude that the plan to kill the prince was done to seem to be an Al-Qaeda-backed domestic insurgency. According to an unnamed senior Saudi official, the idea was to make everything "look like it was done against the government by the people of Saudi Arabia."
Despite its Keystone Cops quality, the plot was broken up only days before it was to have been carried out in November 2003, when Libyan operatives were caught delivering more than $1 million in cash at a hotel in Mecca to Saudi dissidents. They were then supposed to launch grenades and other explosives into Abdullah's residence in Mecca. The thirteen suspects (eight Saudis and five Libyans) are slated soon to go on trial.
The goal of the assassination plot? To destabilize Saudi Arabia and perhaps overthrow the House of Saud. Riyadh responded on Dec. 22, 2004, by announcing the expulsion of Libya's ambassador and the withdrawal of its ambassador from Tripoli. This decision was ascribed by Foreign Minister Saud ibn Faisal to the "ugliness" surrounding the assassination attempt.
July 14, 2005 update: The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a press release today, "Treasury Designates MIRA for Support to Al Qaida," that mentions Alamoudi in an apparently new connection. MIRA stands for the "Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia," a U.K.-based Saudi oppositionist organization, accused of providing material support to al Qaida; it is run by Saad al-Faqih, whom DoT accuses of using MIRA "to facilitate al Qaida's operations." According to the press release,
July 16, 2005 update: Others too noted the above paragraph connecting Alamoudi to Al-Qaeda. Mary Beth Sheridan has an article on the subject in today's Washington Post (but only available reprinted in other papers) in which she flat-out states that this is the "first time" U.S. authorities have made the Alamoudi-Al-Qaeda link, noting that, "If accurate, the new allegation would mark a stunning revelation about a man who for years served as a liaison between American Muslims and the U.S. government." She also adds an important explanation of how this new charge came about: "one U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said the allegation was based on new information that went beyond what was disclosed during Alamoudi's trial in U.S. District Court in Alexandria."
July 29, 2005 update: In an affidavit attached to the Sept. 29, 2003, criminal complaint charging Alamoudi with the Libya-related transactions, we learn today from Bloomberg, two major U.S. financial corporations were party to his mischief.
The criminal complaint also provides nitty-gritty details:
Comment: Giant corporations tend to see themselves as citizens of the world, leading to this sort of consequence for domestic security.
Bloomberg also reports that Alamoudi's lawyer, Stanley Cohen, explained his client's motive in serving an a middleman for murder: "He thought it was a way to get some money for his organizations." Given that those organizations were the American Muslim Council and related groups, that sounds entirely fitting to me.
June 26, 2006 update: Alamoudi's plea agreement called for him to forfeit $910,000 to the U.S. government, that being the estimated proceeds from his criminal activities. The government took $340,000 from his baggage but, unable to find the rest of his loot, took three real estate parcels he owned, plus an automobile to make up for the missing $570,000. Alamoudi claimed that its doing so was illegal, saying that his plea bargain deal did not authorize a substitute forfeiture. A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today unanimously rejected his argument.
Oct. 27, 2008 update: Note the sale of a house in Fairfax, Va., to Alamoudi for $380,000 at the Mar. 25, 2004 update, above, because it is back in the news. Josh Gerstein reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit yesterday that the government has the right to seize that Fairfax property as part of its punishment of Alamoudi.
The government's claim had been contested by one Jehad Alhindi, who claimed the home for herself. She says she bought it from Alamoudi for $380,000 in 2003. Gerstein explains:
July 8, 2011 update: In a surprise move, federal prosecutors asked U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton to reduce Alamoudi's sentence. The reasons and the size of the cut are both under seal but speculation concerns the possibility of his giving information the U.S. government useful in the course of its war fighting in Libya.
July 25, 2011 update: Hilton acceded to the prosecutors and reduced Alamoudi's sentence by 79 months, or just under 7 years. The reasons remain under seal. Alamoudi, should be freed in under a decade.
Reader comments (1) on this item
Comment on this item
Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes