69 million page views

re: Kazi's comments

Reader comment on item: [The Abu Ali Case and] Balancing Liberties, Security

Submitted by Maxx (Canada), Oct 31, 2005 at 20:54

Hello Kazi,

Your letter raises the important question of whether it is a wise strategy to expect the reform of militant Islamist ideologies when Muslims who enjoy little to no legitimacy within Muslim circles are championed by non-Muslim critics, (the latter who enjoy even less legitimacy from Muslims and Arab Solidarity advocates), while Muslims who denounce in no uncertain terms the use of suicide belts to achieve shahada and the next world and who still manage to enjoy some degree of legitimacy from a larger Muslim constituency are ignored or subjected to censure and may even be exposed to censorship from the same non-Muslim critics that champion disliked and controversial Muslim reformists.

I took your advice and I read Firas Ahmed's 'Why Tariq Ramadan?' piece from Islamica Magazine (Spring 2005). Ahmed's principal disliked and controversial Muslim reformist is Irshad Manji and the principle argument Ahmed uses to demonstrate Manji's own irrational intolerance towards the majority of Muslims is the allegation that she: "argues for the removal of verses from the Qur'an that can be misinterpreted by extremists to advocate violence...". Ahmed goes on to explain that asking Muslims to excise verses from what for Islam and most Muslims is an infallible text is tantamount to asking Christians to not believe that Christ died on the Cross etc.

The problem with Ahmed's argument is that Manji does not argue for the removal of a single vowel from the Qu'ran. What Manji argues is that certain verses in the Qu'ran and Hadith which can be interpreted to advocate for violence have to be openly acknowledged by mainstream Islam and its scholars as verses which are capable of inciting violence and when and wherever those verses are invoked as justification for the deliberate murder of non-combatants, those invoking the verses must be widely denounced by mainstream Islam and its scholars, which Manji contests, is not happening today.

She argues that in some cases mainstream Islamic authoritative voices deliver one message renouncing all forms of terrorism to Western Audiences and another message to Muslim audiences in Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, or Malay calling for jihad, shahada, itbakh al-yahud, each incitement referenced to specific Qu'ranic verses and certain Hadith. She argues that because many Muslims have never read the Qu'ran or Hadith for themselves and rely heavily on Imams and teachers at Madrassas for much of their knowledge of the Book of the Prophet and the sayings attributed to him and his successors, Islamist Imams and teachers are empowered to cite from the Qu'ran and hadith selectively, leaving out key words or ignoring the context in which the cited phrases were uttered, and escape scrutiny for doing so not only from unwitting audiences, but also from mainstream Islamic scholars who know better but still prefer not to rebuke them. Instead of rebuking Islamist Imams and teachers, Manji points out that mainstream Islam, its scholars and intellectuals prefer to deflect her criticism of the selective omissions employed by Islamists by disingenuously accusing her of wanting to remove verses from the Qu'ran in an attempt to silence her and her critique. Or they attempt to dismiss her ad hominem because she is a lesbian, or because certain disliked non-Muslim critics of militant Islamist ideology have sung her praises.

Manji argues that to the ears of those who are accustomed to and believe in Western jurisprudential defenses of liberty for the individual citizen from the coercive powers of the state and to the ears of all those who identify with contemporary Western liberal defenses of equality of opportunity for all citizens irrespective of their language, country of origin, disability, religious confession, nationality, ethnicity, colour, sex, or sexual orientation, these strawman and ad hominem attacks from mainstream Islam critics ring hollow.

Irshad Manji can be heard and read in her own words on her website where links are posted to her interview on ABC (Australia) and to a talkback show in which she participated in England.



Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (60) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
wrong [125 words]The TruthMar 7, 2008 14:25121999
1re: Kazi's comments [655 words]MaxxOct 31, 2005 20:5427566
In reply to Octavio Johanson [238 words]Peter J. HerzMar 23, 2005 05:3921136
Support of terrorists [89 words]DonvanMar 17, 2005 16:5921045
The price of liberty [61 words]S.C.PandaMar 17, 2005 04:2521036
Moderate Muslims [180 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
KaziMar 15, 2005 16:0921003
The State's reason for existing [78 words]DogzillaMar 9, 2005 20:0220934
The real danger to US national security [251 words]B. AlotaibiMar 8, 2005 13:2520871
that is wrong [67 words]A Muslim GirlOct 18, 2007 22:0720871
Security, Civil Rights or Propaganda [159 words]JohnMar 6, 2005 16:1820707
Abu Ali case [126 words]Reuben IngberMar 6, 2005 07:4020702
More info on ISA [335 words]Ada EvansMar 4, 2005 19:4620665
Liberals and Conservatives both to blame [271 words]Mark GarretsonMar 4, 2005 15:3520663
Definition of treason? [50 words]Patricia KelcherMar 4, 2005 12:1520661
Inshallah [686 words]Dr. Jamshid IbrahimMar 4, 2005 06:5520656
Hatred taught to Muslim youth [93 words]A. WoodsMar 3, 2005 17:5020650
Reform civil liberties and control immigration [140 words]Octavio JohansonMar 3, 2005 16:2920648
Al Qaeda coached to claim torture... [167 words]L. D. WeinerMar 3, 2005 14:5520647
Defeating terrorism [551 words]Derek BernardMar 3, 2005 13:2220645
Balance [296 words]Dan KatcherMar 3, 2005 12:4620644
Time to abandon multi-culturalism [140 words]Octavio JohansonMar 3, 2005 08:0120642
Did 9/11 in fact "more profoundly affect" conservatives than it did liberals? [35 words]Jonathan RickMar 3, 2005 00:4020640
Silent terrorists within [52 words]Richard I. EllisMar 2, 2005 23:5520639
Libs. & Cons. PROFOUNDLY DERANGED [119 words]ChayajaneMar 2, 2005 22:2120638
Bull's Eye! [85 words]Jeremy RabkinMar 2, 2005 20:1720634
Relax [301 words]Werner de RocqerMar 2, 2005 19:3420633
Let the courts decide [89 words]David J. BastyrMar 2, 2005 17:1920632
I choose SECURITY [140 words]Tony FigueroaMar 2, 2005 15:2120631
Mistakes [43 words]Robert PattersonMar 2, 2005 14:3220629
Deportation [151 words]Octavio JohansonMar 2, 2005 14:2020628
WHY! [231 words]Paul RinderleMar 2, 2005 14:1420627
Your correct appraisal of 'Liberalism'.. [80 words]NitsuardMar 2, 2005 14:1220626
We share your fears. [125 words]K. A. KhanMar 2, 2005 12:3220622
Politics and the actual law [146 words]Chad DesLauriersMar 2, 2005 12:1620621
Training on US soil [82 words]WilksMar 2, 2005 10:1720619
Article on Balancing Liberaties [36 words]Annette HughesMar 2, 2005 09:5720618
The problem is that the Saudis can get away with anything! [208 words]Kenneth S. BesigMar 2, 2005 06:3420617
The Abu Ali Case and] Balancing Liberties, Security [29 words]Rachelle Assouline-SeynaeveMar 2, 2005 05:2120616
Black or white fallacy [61 words]Nick GoodMar 2, 2005 04:1420615
Hmmmmm. [36 words]Peter J. HerzMar 1, 2005 23:2620610
Abu... we hardly knew yeh? [88 words]Donald OMar 1, 2005 23:0020609
Life or Liberty [535 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMar 1, 2005 21:4120604
The Abu Ali Case [1 words]Edward MametMar 1, 2005 21:1820601
I am with you, Mr. Pipes [78 words]Carol McLaughlinMar 1, 2005 21:0920600
They don't get it [141 words]RobMar 1, 2005 20:4920599
Abu Ali case [96 words]Darwin S. StamperMar 1, 2005 20:3320598
Impaled on the horns of a very big dilemma [274 words]Darwin BarrettMar 1, 2005 19:5220596
Seeds of our destruction [28 words]Sam Richter MDMar 1, 2005 19:4120595
American Protection from Terrorist Threat [41 words]Charles J PaineMar 1, 2005 18:2520593
Blind [342 words]Donald W. BalesMar 1, 2005 18:2220592
Forget about civil liberties [169 words]Octavio JohansonMar 1, 2005 18:1920591
Exactly right Mr. Pipes [123 words]Paul RhoadsMar 1, 2005 17:5920589
Frightening! [36 words]Nathan RothMar 1, 2005 17:4120588
Has Bush hatred gone so far that we feel no outrage? [72 words]Northern VirginiastanMar 1, 2005 17:0420587
Accurate [45 words]Jeremiah J. SpiresMar 1, 2005 16:5720586
Liberals are losing their brains [45 words]bashaMar 1, 2005 16:3220585
A necessary choice [41 words]Herbert B. BorteckMar 1, 2005 16:3020583
Freedom First [304 words]PatMar 1, 2005 16:2520582
The press and propaganda re Abu Ali [54 words]S. Vladimer LTC USAR RetMar 1, 2005 15:5520581
Another Way of Assessing the Question [405 words]Leonard DeutchmanMar 1, 2005 15:1520579

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)