69 million page views

The U.N. a useless organization

Reader comment on item: Obama, Kerry and Netanyahu Go Visceral

Submitted by YJ Draiman (United States), Jan 6, 2017 at 02:19

The U.N. a useless organization

In a Democratic legal system if you have decision that you think is erroneous or unjust you can appeal that decision and many times it is reversed.
U.N. opinions and or resolutions are biased, unjust, arbitrary and capricious (the same apply to the ICJ – International Court of Justice).
The U.N. has issued numerous opinions and resolutions that are biased, unsubstantiated and contrary to historical and factual evidence. This U.N. collusion with corrupt and biased countries and the issuance of egregious opinions and resolution has eroded the credibility of the U.N. beyond repair.
This has raised the ire and an outcry by many nations, politicians and institutions to de-fund the U.N. and dismantle it.
It is well known that the U.N. and the ICJ can only offer and issue a non-binding advisory recommended opinions and resolutions which carry no legal affect. They can only issue a non-binding recommendation and resolution and if it is accepted by all parties, then their recommended opinion and resolution is applicable. Otherwise it has no meaning, validity, and no legal standing.

Therefore, my suggestion is stop panicking and aggrandizing these biased criminal organizations. Their recommended opinion has no meaningful value.

By reacting to and citing the recommendations of this criminal organization as having any validity, you are misleading the public that the recommended opinions by these criminal organizations might have some validity.
It is time to expose the fraud and deception by these unethical, corrupt and unjust organizations and dismantle them completely.
It will also save a substantial amount of money and resources that could be put to a better use.

YJ Draiman

P.S. The League of Nations was replaced by the United Nations, since the league did not accomplish its purpose. The U.N. has not accomplished its purpose for what it was created to perform ethically and honestly.
In today's society the Nations of the world can function without an organization such as the U.N.
If the Nations of the world desire to establish a new International Peace organization, it must put some very specific Charter, with a caveat, that if it is not performing unbiased, ethically, honestly and justly, with respect to each member country, it will be dismantled.
A citizens committee might be set to monitor its functions to perform ethically, justly and unbiased, un-falsified, verified and substantiated factual unbiased opinions.
YJ Draiman

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (29) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Obama would've done it even had Clinton won [158 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AnonJan 12, 2017 17:44235303
The U.N. a useless organization [396 words]YJ DraimanJan 6, 2017 02:19235165
Another perspective on the Obama-Kerry-Netanyahu remarks [187 words]Bryan TaplitsJan 5, 2017 12:32235151
1I am somewhat surprised at all the commotion regarding the U.N resolution 2334 [442 words]YJ DraimanJan 4, 2017 11:38235118
Kerry blows his top [105 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Menahem LesterJan 3, 2017 12:53235075
Netanyahu deserves the benefit of the doubt [207 words]Saul SteinJan 3, 2017 12:12235074
1Posting - 1922, a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress of the United States unanimously endorsed the "Mandate for Palestine," [464 words]YJ DraimanJan 2, 2017 04:55235055
Obama's policy is too consistent to be "visceral" [255 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Dan SimonJan 1, 2017 20:30235047
Pipes is Correct [504 words]Sigmund SilberJan 1, 2017 02:13235039
The U.N. did not create or re-establish Israel [359 words]YJ DraimanJan 4, 2017 13:20235039
Obama, Kerry and Netanyahu go Visceral [138 words]Frances WeingartenDec 31, 2016 12:12235010
The million person march that never happened [196 words]leonard okenDec 31, 2016 08:49235006
2Why an intemperate and uncontrolled Donald Trump? [114 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MenachemDec 31, 2016 02:43234995
Good points, Menachem! [228 words]Michael S.Jan 2, 2017 11:45234995
7Trump and Putin Making Deals [347 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertDec 31, 2016 00:29234994
2Time to call a spade a spade [128 words]PrashantJan 2, 2017 11:11234994
1"Intemperate and uncontrolled Trump"? [22 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Brutus BalanDec 30, 2016 21:32234991
Obama ,Kerry and Netanyahu go visceral [50 words]OpensocDec 30, 2016 20:25234988
Netanyahu may have over-played his Trump hand [153 words]Michael SJan 2, 2017 13:43234988
Netanyahu may have over-played his Trump hand [1 [105 words]OpensocJan 4, 2017 07:53234988
Bright future? Hmmm. [241 words]Michael S.Jan 10, 2017 12:54234988
Obama, Kerry and Netanyahu go visceral. [165 words]WartyDec 30, 2016 19:25234987
Out of control response? [65 words]EdDec 30, 2016 18:50234986
Obama actually is consistent, he chose the Arafat rejection map [115 words]Ronald DolginDec 30, 2016 17:57234985
If the U.S. was conquered by various nations over a thousand years plus [137 words]YJ DraimanJan 2, 2017 04:49234985
I agree with Netanyahu. [350 words]Anne JulienneDec 30, 2016 17:05234984
Leaders of Nations. Their thinking about Israel. response to Anne Julienne [151 words]Anne- USADec 31, 2016 09:16234984
1Thank you, Daniel .. thank you, thank you .. [38 words]Anne JulienneDec 31, 2016 14:28234984
Trump negotiating [57 words]Allen F MackenzieDec 30, 2016 16:27234983

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The U.N. a useless organization by YJ Draiman

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)