69 million page views

An observation you may not have considered

Reader comment on item: What's True Islam? Not for U.S. [Government] to Say

Submitted by Peter Herz (United States), Aug 28, 2013 at 21:12

Dr. Pipes, Dr. Pipes, Dr. Pipes! You're right that our State Department spokespersons are out of their depth telling what is and is not "good" Islam. And I certainly agree wholeheartedly with Dr. Lewis' statement which you qhote. But, as a former minion of the US Department of State, I think I can dig a little deeper into the issue which you raise in your post.

It is the birthright of the American liberal, of which the State Department is generously stocked, to be so knowledgeable that with only the most perfunctory knowledge of Islamic practice, Qur'an, and Hadith, he knows more about Islam than the entire faculties of al-Azhar and Qom put together. After all, the American secular liberal got his B.A. from Podunk Normal in six years and reads the New York Times.

Consider this same tribe that never darkens the door of a church save when touring the great cathedrals of Europe and has the dust so thick on its Bible that you can write "d@mn@tion" in it, has never hesitated to lecture practicing Christians what their religion is supposed to be. I daresay that should the whole slough of ancient rabbis from Ezra and the Great Synagogue down through the compilers of the Talmud Bavli return (with Maimonides, Yehuda Loeb, the Vilna Gaon, etc. thrown in for good measure), an American liberal who doesn't even know what the Five Books of Moses are would declare the lot of them mere nincompoops in the "real" meaning of rabbinic Judaism.

These people, after being applauded by the MSM when they take a high-mindedly unctuous tone to lecture some blunt-spoken down-home Evangelical on what Christianity really is are sincerely bewildered and confused when no-one in the entire Dar-ul-Islam listens to them, or replies with a to-the-point "Shut up, Kufr".

The sort of thing you describe (and over which I actually weep) is not just offensive: it makes the US look ridiculous as well. Maybe next, they'll have our diplomatic spoxx drop their pants in public, too.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (25) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Trahison des clercs [84 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreSep 11, 2014 06:47217752
Politicians are the real problem - they prevent the truth about Islam from being told!! [124 words]JaladhiSep 3, 2014 21:30217593
1Imam Straw? Get Real [101 words]DaveSep 2, 2014 08:06217565
1The US jails an enemy of Islam [72 words]VijaySep 12, 2013 05:13209662
2Burning qurans vs. printing them [106 words]PrashantSep 13, 2013 07:03209662
An observation you may not have considered [337 words]Peter HerzAug 28, 2013 21:12209282
Elected Politicians and Islam [227 words]PrashantAug 30, 2013 18:14209282
1Strange Reasoning [170 words]DaveAug 25, 2013 15:11209211
3Pres. Obama --Defining "good" and "bad" Muslims, Christians, etc. [163 words]EmmettAug 14, 2013 16:24208978
On Heresy versus Orthodoxy [71 words]ZentristJun 4, 2009 21:33156781
well.. [5 words]JulieDec 5, 2007 17:34115780
ISLAM AND VIOLENCE [79 words]samMar 22, 2006 21:1641119
1What a way to justify cruelty! [84 words]True IndianJul 3, 2007 17:2141119
2If it quacks like a duck... [619 words]Nick4693Jul 4, 2007 20:5341119
To Nick4693 [76 words]True IndianJul 13, 2007 10:4341119
George W. was innocent until [198 words]George KeselmanAug 17, 2013 21:5341119
1Cruelty to women? [95 words]Barney PopkinJul 19, 2002 19:281368
1cruelty is not islamic [78 words]SanaFeb 24, 2006 01:041368
2status of women in islam [138 words]donvanFeb 24, 2006 13:451368
To Donvan [54 words]SanaFeb 25, 2006 13:281368
not again [375 words]somayDec 12, 2007 21:191368
2Open Your Mind [154 words]christianFeb 12, 2008 18:381368
2Our dear sana and women in Islam [462 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 13, 2008 18:451368
of course it was unislamic... [34 words]sarahMay 7, 2008 08:471368
1Read [51 words]FashaJul 24, 2010 14:121368

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)