Submitted by myth (Germany), Mar 5, 2013 at 04:59
The AIVD is the Dutch domestic intelligence agency. Their 2011 report is here:
https://www.aivd.nl/english/publications-press/@2911/annual-report-2011-0/
It uses "Islam" as the defining term in the section:
"2.1 Islamist extremism
In investigating Islamist extremism, in recent years the AIVD has concentrated especially upon radical and ultra orthodox movements like Tablighi Jamaat, Hizb utTahrir, the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafism.(...)"
On their website the AIVD prefers "jihadist" to "islamist". The navigation structure reflects this.
https://www.aivd.nl/onderwerpen-0/terrorisme/jihadistische/
They explain their use of language on this page as "De AIVD hanteert de definitie:'Extremistische ideologie waarin de verheerlijking van de gewelddadige jihad centraal staat'." Or in English: "The AIVD uses the definition: Extremist ideology to which the glorification of violent jihad is central."
The mere concept of defining proper language within the agency, avoiding the word Islam, makes me suspicious.
What I miss from the full report
https://www.aivd.nl/onderwerpen-0/terrorisme/organisatie/@2048/lokale-jihadistische/
is the ongoing death threat to member of parliament Geert Wilders. I also miss Arabic-language content on webpage. The Netherlands have a large Moroccan immigrant population. I see the Dutch AIVD partly in denial.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".