69 million page views

A Textbook Example of Conspiracy Theory

Reader comment on item: The "October Surprise" Theory

Submitted by Ronald Wieck (United States), Mar 22, 2004 at 04:37

The sixth revised edition of Rise to Globalism: American Foreign Policy Since 1938 (Penguin Books, 1991), by Stephen E. Ambrose, contains the following description of the closing days of Jimmy Carter's administration: "On November 4, Ronald Reagan defeated Carter in the presidential election, thereby putting additional pressure on Khomeini, who could hardly expect the incoming Reagan administration to offer as favorable a deal as the outgoing Carter administration. (Reagan was denouncing the Iranians as "barbarians" and "common criminals" and hinting that he would take strong and direct military action against them.) Therefore, Iran, on December 21, demanded a specific ransom for the captives--$24 billion--deposited in Algeria."

The eighth revised edition (1997) removes the parentheses and adds the phrase, "In public," before "Reagan." Three additional sentences materialize right before the one about the the ransom demand: "Actually, Reagan had made a private deal with Khomeini. If the Iranians would hold the hostages until after the election, the new Reagan administration would pay ransom for them in the form of arms for Iran. Khomeini badly needed the weapons for his war with Iraq, so the deal was struck."

Douglas G. Brinkley's name appears on the cover as co-author, suggesting some sort of ransom deal as the amount of new material over the previous seven editions is minimal. Here then is a book written for students and lay readers presenting a discredited conspiracy theory as historical fact. Have any reviewers noted the ideological tendentiousness supplied to a well-respected textbook by the current chronicler of John Kerry's exploits in Vietnam? Did Brinkley discuss the change with Ambrose? If a conservative co-author, allowed to rampage through a standard text on American history, inserted a passage averring that Bill Clinton sold military secrets to the Chinese in order to swell his campaign coffers, would the reviewers notice? You think?
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (16) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
October Surprise [111 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jane ClarkSep 3, 2016 13:00232208
Stoelting UltraScribe polygraph [10 words]David HowardFeb 24, 2010 17:37169360
Google "Pedophilia in Bush/Reagan White House" [7 words]David HowardMar 2, 2015 13:08169360
1Google "papa kills babies" [18 words]David HowardJun 27, 2015 18:31169360
Google "Paul Wilcher" [35 words]David HowardJul 3, 2015 14:49169360
October Surprise [178 words]David HowardAug 20, 2015 21:06169360
Google "Ricky Dearman needs lie detector" [14 words]David HowardAug 24, 2015 10:40169360
Google David Howard convicted criminal [7 words]Sam BestSep 9, 2016 10:37169360
A Textbook Example of Conspiracy Theory [303 words]Ronald WieckMar 22, 2004 04:3714286
1Admirartion [78 words]Larry ChandlerMar 21, 2004 23:3314284
Why such resistance? [230 words]john w. mcginleyMar 21, 2004 19:4014280
Our Revels Now are Ended [427 words]John BlakeApr 5, 2007 18:3914280
It's the same the world over [256 words]Peter J. HerzMar 21, 2004 19:2514279
Another "October" surprise? [110 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Vijay DandapaniMar 21, 2004 19:1814278
October Surprise revelations [100 words]John HarmanMar 21, 2004 17:1714276
Timing [42 words]Walter E. WallisMar 21, 2004 16:2414274

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)