Submitted by Vijay Dandapani(United States), Mar 21, 2004 at 19:18
I presume one reason Daniel Pipes brings this up is in connection with growing rumours of another October surprise - this time with the Pakistanis fetching up Bin Laden and/or Zawahiri in time to boost President Bush's re-election prospects. While, quite clearly, the Iranian episode is false, I certainly do not expect the administration to enter into such a crass quid pro quo with Pakistan. However, I would not put it past the Pakistan's military to spring OBL with expectations of significant rewards from the US. Thus far, it has proven to be a viable modus vivendi for them - witness their designation as a significant non-NATO ally last week.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.
Daniel Pipes replies:
No, your assumption is wrong. I wrote this article quite a while ago but it only arrived now in published form, so I sent it out now.