Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Nazareth
Reader comment on item: How Many Islamists?

Submitted by Pointing out errors (Canada), Oct 19, 2008 at 22:26

When talking about Israel, Daniel Pipes quotes a Jerusalem Post article that says that an Islamic party won 75% of the vote in Umm el-Fahm . Fine.

But Mr. Pipes forgets about the result in Nazareth, where the party's affiliated list, the United Nazareth list, was defeated by the secular parties. This is important because Umm el-Fahm is nowhere near the size of Nazareth, the largest Arab city in Israel.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title By Date
an inquiry
[w/response] [16 words]
sohaib zafarOct 22, 2008 00:38
⇒ Nazareth [70 words]Pointing out errorsOct 19, 2008 22:26
Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West [395 words]Theresa FlemingOct 9, 2008 13:28
So whats the issue !! [171 words]Waqar AkbarOct 9, 2008 02:10
comment [32 words]mehekJun 4, 2008 07:06
How many is too many? [6 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiMay 20, 2008 18:12
Esposito needs to be exposed [86 words]G.VishvasMay 10, 2008 10:07
We are in the Middle of WW3 ! [469 words]Michael BurdDec 28, 2006 04:58

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page